#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
to the OP: I don't know that I would invest the money that a custom full-suspension Ti MTB will cost, if I wasn't 100% sure what I wanted and that I would ride it often enough to justify the cost. if you don't end up riding it and want to sell, you're going to take a bigger hit on resale than if you'd gone another route; because MTB's change so fast and are so specific, but also because bikes just don't return a whole lot on the investment, custom especially. maybe better to get a road bike or replace your gravel bike, or sell your place in the queue perhaps? fwiw, I paid half price or less for all three of my Ti frames, because they were used. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I’ll throw in with the group that says Ti is a great material for MTBs. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
FS designs are really advanced and the layout possibilities that carbon provides to optimize linkage placement cannot be replicated with metal tubes.
As others have noted, I too don't think a custom ti FS is the best place to put your hard earned dollars. The forgiving sizing of modern mtbs allows sizes to fit more people, and while there are so many design options, any of the major players will deliver a really fun ride, and probably more cheaply than your custom builder. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Ti is a fantastic choice for a hardtail. Unless I misunderstand the OP, we're talking full sus here. Much of what makes Ti awesome in a hardtail becomes less awesome or maybe just muted under 4+" of travel front and rear. Also, you want to be sure your builder really understands suspension kinematics. Add in the amount of time and money that Trek/Speshy/Santa Cruz/Ibis/Transition/whoever have spent refining their suspension platforms, and I think modern production carbon is the sweet spot here. Not that you can't get a great Ti FS trail bike, just that I think your bang for the buck, even if you're spending up near $10k or more, is in carbon.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Seems that: Moots, IF, SEVEN, Kent E/Brad B, Strong, etc seem to make ok bikes out of Ti. Regardless, I have had Ti hard tails, softails, and full sussers all great bikes. But I am just one guy. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Hmmm... titanium is an everlasting material. MTBs otoh change their tech and standards(hubs, brakes, BB, angles, geo) so fast a bike is obsolete before decals are even scratched.
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Standards will change regardless frame material. Not sure why A titanium frame would be more apt for obsolescence than another frame material.
__________________
***IG: mttamgrams*** |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
On mtbs standards have changed faster so a bike that lasts longer make less sense as an mtb. Mtbs also have big rubber, fat wheels and the subtleties of titanium are less perceived than on a road bike.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
I would like a serotta legend but don´t care much for a serotta 26in ti max hardtail.. even though the mtb may be the best 26in hardtail ever made.
Last edited by colker; 07-17-2019 at 05:51 PM. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Huh? I know this will not help you understand your logic is flawed but...., a 26er steel bike is just as obsolete as a 26er carbon bike as obsolete as a 26er titanium bike. It’s not the material that made it obsolete.
__________________
***IG: mttamgrams*** |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It´s a material made to last immune to corrosion. An mtb is fleeting tech that makes any frame obsolete quick time. Otoh ti have subtle ride qualities best perceived on a road bike which does not have susp forks and fat heavy rubber. It´s crystal clear what i am saying. If i am building an mtb i will use steel, aluminum or carbon. Last edited by colker; 07-17-2019 at 06:20 PM. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
OP, trust the builder. If you can't do that, move on and don't waste your money on something you won't smile about when you ride it.
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
***IG: mttamgrams*** |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
#30
|
|||
|
|||
I’m with this group as well.
|
|
|