Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 08-05-2019, 10:53 AM
genefruit genefruit is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 17
46/30 Easton with 11-34 Shimano 11spd.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 08-05-2019, 11:13 AM
efixler efixler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 281
48/32 front 11-32 rear, but I kinda wish I had 11-34 rear
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 08-05-2019, 11:20 AM
JEFFTHEROBOT's Avatar
JEFFTHEROBOT JEFFTHEROBOT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Colorado
Posts: 61
I run a 1x on my Open.
32t up front and 9/46 E-thirteen cassette in the rear.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 08-05-2019, 11:40 AM
moonhoo moonhoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 175
48/32 front and 11-36 rear on my BMC Monster Cross.

Works fine for me on most climbs in the NY / MA / CT area but I definitely wish I had lower in the front, especially for times when I'm carrying food. Summers are only getting hotter, and tackling those long slow climbs at max heart rate and 100F+ degree heat can't be so good for the body.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 08-05-2019, 03:14 PM
XXtwindad XXtwindad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 8,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by JEFFTHEROBOT View Post
I run a 1x on my Open.
32t up front and 9/46 E-thirteen cassette in the rear.
That's the way to do it Jeff!
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 08-05-2019, 03:20 PM
XXtwindad XXtwindad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 8,040
On that note ...

Here's what I've occasionally encountered, and I'm curious as to why: opposition to big cassettes. Is there some unwritten law of cycling that mandates you have to climb 12 percent grade hills with an 11-28? Or even 11-32?

I'm not talking about people with different preferences, but the individuals I've encountered (and there have been more than a few) who look at a 10-42 with utter disdain. Why is that? Just curious ...
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 08-05-2019, 03:39 PM
ColonelJLloyd ColonelJLloyd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Louisville
Posts: 5,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by XXtwindad View Post
Here's what I've occasionally encountered, and I'm curious as to why: opposition to big cassettes. Is there some unwritten law of cycling that mandates you have to climb 12 percent grade hills with an 11-28? Or even 11-32?

I'm not talking about people with different preferences, but the individuals I've encountered (and there have been more than a few) who look at a 10-42 with utter disdain. Why is that? Just curious ...
They're likely the same people who whine that 32mm tires are "balloons". I've encountered a lot of older roadies who, like a lot of people, just seem to scoff at what they don't understand. You know, like gearing maths. They're in all walks of life, but the ones who are cyclists seem to make themselves known loudly.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 08-05-2019, 03:52 PM
nobuseri nobuseri is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 929
I will admit that I am (was?) in that camp that tried to keep the cassettes in the rear on the smaller side. More so because I don’t like the jump in between lower gears. Some of the jumps between gears are pretty extreme!

I ride primarily road. I am learning that gravel is a diff ball game altogether. And not just talking gearing and bike handling.

But yes, I am seeing the light when it comes to steeper pitches and gravel. Lots of good feedback here. Will be making some adjustments in the next couple weeks to see how it goes.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 08-05-2019, 04:18 PM
tony_mm's Avatar
tony_mm tony_mm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 240
Quote:
Originally Posted by XXtwindad View Post
Here's what I've occasionally encountered, and I'm curious as to why: opposition to big cassettes. Is there some unwritten law of cycling that mandates you have to climb 12 percent grade hills with an 11-28? Or even 11-32?

I'm not talking about people with different preferences, but the individuals I've encountered (and there have been more than a few) who look at a 10-42 with utter disdain. Why is that? Just curious ...
Yes for old roadies like me, riding with big cassette meant in the old days that you were not strong enough for cycling. The biggest you could go was 39-26 and riding big gears was a sign of strength (Ullrich etc..). At that time, MTB was just starting, gravel biking was not there etc....That was also the time before Mr. Armstrong and his spinning cadence.

Many things have changed since these times. Armstrong won several TdF, MTB is popular, powermeter are widely available etc....

Some old roadies are still thinking the same than before (I have to admit that it is hard for me to change. I still ride big gears..).
And some people would like to look like the old roadies I suppose.
And many people just don't understand cycling, gears, cadence, power, etc....
And last but not least many people just want to show that they (!) are the true one etc....
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 08-05-2019, 05:30 PM
timto timto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ottawa On
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by XXtwindad View Post
Here's what I've occasionally encountered, and I'm curious as to why: opposition to big cassettes. Is there some unwritten law of cycling that mandates you have to climb 12 percent grade hills with an 11-28? Or even 11-32?

I'm not talking about people with different preferences, but the individuals I've encountered (and there have been more than a few) who look at a 10-42 with utter disdain. Why is that? Just curious ...
I use a 46/30 TA crank with a 28 or 30 rear and get a 1:1 no problem. I find the big cassettes really heavy as well as unsightly
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 08-05-2019, 06:24 PM
HTupolev HTupolev is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by XXtwindad View Post
Here's what I've occasionally encountered, and I'm curious as to why: opposition to big cassettes. Is there some unwritten law of cycling that mandates you have to climb 12 percent grade hills with an 11-28? Or even 11-32?

I'm not talking about people with different preferences, but the individuals I've encountered (and there have been more than a few) who look at a 10-42 with utter disdain. Why is that? Just curious ...
Mostly wide gear spacing, especially if a gravel bike will see lots of paved road use.

Big cassettes also have a ton of rotating inertia when a bike is being pedaled at high speed. This can result in poor behaviors on drivetrains without damped tensioners, like the upper run of the chain going slack and slapping about whenever you start coasting on a descent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ColonelJLloyd View Post
They're likely the same people who whine that 32mm tires are "balloons".
I've currently got an 11-28 cassette on my gravel bike, but my lowest gear is lower than on some of my friends' bikes with 42-tooth big cogs. And I've got 2" tires.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 08-05-2019, 06:27 PM
AngryScientist's Avatar
AngryScientist AngryScientist is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northeast NJ
Posts: 33,182
Caring about what other cyclists think about the size of your cassette is so weird.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 08-05-2019, 06:38 PM
XXtwindad XXtwindad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 8,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryScientist View Post
Caring about what other cyclists think about the size of your cassette is so weird.
That wasn't really my point. It was more of a general question about the antipathy toward larger cassettes, and where that antipathy came from.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 08-05-2019, 08:05 PM
GregL GregL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Syracuse, NY
Posts: 3,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by XXtwindad View Post
That wasn't really my point. It was more of a general question about the antipathy toward larger cassettes, and where that antipathy came from.
In my case, I like cassettes with small jumps between cogs. Since I'm running a double-chainring crankset, I don't need a cassette larger than an 11-34. If I were running a single chainring for gravel riding, I would undoubtedly have a wider ratio cassette.

Greg
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 08-05-2019, 09:51 PM
PeregrineA1 PeregrineA1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 317
46/36 and 11-32 on the Blackcat.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.