Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-16-2019, 10:27 PM
d_douglas d_douglas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 9,807
Best PF30 bottom bracket?

I am in process of acquiring a cheap new-to-me frame and it has a PF30 BB shell. What BB do I get? I have a gossamer BB30 crankset that I could use or a square taper Sugino - either are great (though I guess I am leaning towards the sugino)

Is there a PF30 to threaded bb out there that is secure and maintenance free for a 200lber?

The seller had a thread-together Praxis that sounded good - would anyone agree? Others?

This bike will be cheeeeeeppp, so I want the cheapest possible solution that will still ensure a modicum of performance
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-16-2019, 10:38 PM
dave thompson's Avatar
dave thompson dave thompson is offline
You still here?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spokane, Washington
Posts: 10,801
I’ll strongly agree with the Praxis recommendation. I’ve got a Spectrum with a PF30 BB using the Praxis BB. Absolutely quiet and seemingly bulletproof under my 14.29 stone butt. (That’s 200lbs in new money)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-16-2019, 10:47 PM
zmalwo zmalwo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,442
I think anything threaded in the middle will give you a good result.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-16-2019, 10:48 PM
dbnm dbnm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 3,191
I am using a Kogel on my Moots Vamoots RSL with Dura Ace 9000 cranks. No issues whatsoever.
And I weigh 71 kg.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-17-2019, 12:21 AM
d_douglas d_douglas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 9,807
Thanks ! Given my luddite tendencies, I would prefer to use the square taper Sugino crankset.

Is there a Praxis BB that converts PF30 to threaded BSA?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-17-2019, 05:35 AM
dave thompson's Avatar
dave thompson dave thompson is offline
You still here?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spokane, Washington
Posts: 10,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_douglas View Post
Thanks ! Given my luddite tendencies, I would prefer to use the square taper Sugino crankset.

Is there a Praxis BB that converts PF30 to threaded BSA?
Contact Praxis directly. They’re good folks. https://praxiscycles.com/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-17-2019, 06:57 AM
VTR1000SP2 VTR1000SP2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Posts: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_douglas View Post
Thanks ! Given my luddite tendencies, I would prefer to use the square taper Sugino crankset.

Is there a Praxis BB that converts PF30 to threaded BSA?
My Izalco Max frameset came with a PF30 insert that converted the frame to threaded BSA. I never used it and can send it to you if you cover the shipping.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-17-2019, 11:54 AM
d_douglas d_douglas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 9,807
Thanks! Now my next dumb question: what length BB does a Sugino triple set up as a 36x24t. And literally, you just grease up the threads and slide it into this adaptor?

Do I need to put Loctite on this plastic sleeve?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-17-2019, 02:43 PM
TEMPLE TEMPLE is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Nanaimo, BC
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_douglas View Post
I am in process of acquiring a cheap new-to-me frame and it has a PF30 BB shell. What BB do I get? I have a gossamer BB30 crankset that I could use or a square taper Sugino - either are great (though I guess I am leaning towards the sugino)

Is there a PF30 to threaded bb out there that is secure and maintenance free for a 200lber?

The seller had a thread-together Praxis that sounded good - would anyone agree? Others?

This bike will be cheeeeeeppp, so I want the cheapest possible solution that will still ensure a modicum of performance
I got a cheap FSA PF30-to-threaded converter from MEC. Haven't installed it yet, but can't imagine why it wouldn't work. I have had a few Praxis PF30 BBs, including one on my main mountain bike. They are OK, but the durability doesn't seem great. I'll use the FSA converter on my mountain bike after I wear out my last PF30 BB.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-17-2019, 03:20 PM
kiwisimon's Avatar
kiwisimon kiwisimon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 942
why not use the most modern standard that you can get at whatever your budget is? Seems like a lot of effort to stay locked in the 20th century.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-17-2019, 05:42 PM
berserk87's Avatar
berserk87 berserk87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Plainfield, Indiana
Posts: 1,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwisimon View Post
why not use the most modern standard that you can get at whatever your budget is? Seems like a lot of effort to stay locked in the 20th century.
Because the "most modern standard" that you reference is the press fit bottom bracket - something that did not evolve out of the need for solving a problem. It did nothing to make anything better for the consumer, but it did make the manufacturing process cheaper and easier for frame makers.

There was some argument about weight savings on the press fit stuff, but it was mostly marketing pablum to make the change more palatable to the end user.

I'm not sure about the need to add an adaptor necessarily, to convert press fit to threaded. I'm not sure what that accomplishes, but I am ignorant on the topic of press-fit to threaded converters. It would seem that it has to do with the application of the OP's crank of choice.

The short answer for your question (in my opinion) is "because the modern standard blows".

Last edited by berserk87; 09-17-2019 at 05:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-17-2019, 06:09 PM
kiwisimon's Avatar
kiwisimon kiwisimon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 942
I was thinking more of the BB30 cranks he has. Slip in a threaded PF30 bracket and use the BB30 cranks. He solves the potential noise problem and has modern standards. I have only used PF30 once and experienced no major problems but perhaps I was lucky.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-17-2019, 06:53 PM
berserk87's Avatar
berserk87 berserk87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Plainfield, Indiana
Posts: 1,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwisimon View Post
I was thinking more of the BB30 cranks he has. Slip in a threaded PF30 bracket and use the BB30 cranks. He solves the potential noise problem and has modern standards. I have only used PF30 once and experienced no major problems but perhaps I was lucky.
Got it. The additional explanation helped.

The issues that I've seen with the PF30 system are:

1. Mystery creaking and gremlins that seem chronic

2. The fact that a bearing press is needed in order to do an installation

3. The fact that a punch is needed to remove them (well, recommended anyway)

The threaded BB's go install and remove with the same tool, and seem to require a lesser degree of precision.

My advocacy of threaded systems may be irrelevant because he's talking about using an adaptor - the adaptor could have the same issues with creaking and such, no?

Last edited by berserk87; 09-17-2019 at 06:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-18-2019, 10:47 AM
dddd dddd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 2,204
I see potential issues with a composite adapter.

Since a cartridge bb installs with cup force pushing in to secure the cartridge, the adapter in turn must resist this "clamping" force by being heavily tightened into the smooth bb shell. This tightening tension in the adapter appears to be resisted by thin composite flanges, which leads me to suspect that the tension may not be adequate to keep a threaded cartridge installation tight over time. Not only will the flanges yield initially, but the clamping force on the bb cartridge itself will forever be trying to pull the two halves of the adapter apart, so would seem to encourage loosening (with resultant severe creaking) over time.

As much as I dislike the excessive and fixed chainline of today's modern-style cranksets, I might prefer here to use the pressfit bb, since I have had no troubles with these on quite a few of my own installations.

Most of the pressfit bb's I've purchased were SRAM, inexpensive and seemingly creak-free.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.