Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #211  
Old 03-29-2019, 12:43 PM
Gsinill's Avatar
Gsinill Gsinill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Northwest suburbs of Chicago
Posts: 2,916
Getting tougher for Boeing

First US lawsuit filed against Boeing by the family of one of the victims.
Ralph Nader's grandniece being amongst the fatalities most likely adds some visibility too.
Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 03-30-2019, 02:39 AM
alancw3 alancw3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ashburn, Va
Posts: 2,526
a new article that I felt not only explained the current problem with the max planes but gives a history of how it developed:

https://www.vox.com/business-and-fin...ndal-explained
__________________
ILLEGITIMUS NON CARBORUNDUM
''Don't Let The Bastards Grind You Down''
Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 07-27-2019, 03:20 PM
Tony T's Avatar
Tony T Tony T is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,158
The Roots of Boeing’s 737 Max Crisis: A Regulator Relaxes Its Oversight
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/27/b...core-ios-share

So the company never submitted an updated safety assessment of those changes to the agency. In several briefings in 2016, an F.A.A. test pilot learned the details of the system from Boeing. But the two F.A.A. engineers didn’t understand that MCAS could move the tail as much as 2.5 degrees, according to two people familiar with their thinking.

Under the impression the system was insignificant, officials didn’t require Boeing to tell pilots about MCAS. When the company asked to remove mention of MCAS from the pilot’s manual, the agency agreed. The F.A.A. also did not mention the software in 30 pages of detailed descriptions noting differences between the Max and the previous iteration of the 737.

Days after the Lion Air crash, the agency invited Boeing executives to the F.A.A.’s Seattle headquarters, according to two people with knowledge of the matter. The officials sat incredulous as Boeing executives explained details about the system that they didn’t know.

In the middle of the conversation, an F.A.A. employee, one of the people said, interrupted to ask a question on the minds of several agency engineers: Why hadn’t Boeing updated the safety analysis of a system that had become so dangerous?

Last edited by Tony T; 07-27-2019 at 03:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #214  
Old 07-27-2019, 03:52 PM
OtayBW OtayBW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NoBaltoCo
Posts: 6,158
And yet it still took until March 2016 for the US to ground the aircraft.
__________________
“A bicycle is not a sofa”
-- Dario Pegoretti
Reply With Quote
  #215  
Old 07-27-2019, 06:26 PM
unterhausen unterhausen is offline
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,958
It is pretty disappointing that Boeing engineering has fallen to such a pitiful level.
Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 09-18-2019, 08:08 AM
Tony T's Avatar
Tony T Tony T is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,158
NYT FEATURE
What Really Brought Down the Boeing 737 Max?
Malfunctions caused two deadly crashes. But an industry that puts unprepared pilots in the cockpit is just as guilty.

By William Langewiesche
Sept. 18, 2019
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/18/m...core-ios-share
Reply With Quote
  #217  
Old 09-18-2019, 08:43 AM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony T View Post
NYT FEATURE
What Really Brought Down the Boeing 737 Max?
Malfunctions caused two deadly crashes. But an industry that puts unprepared pilots in the cockpit is just as guilty.

By William Langewiesche
Sept. 18, 2019
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/18/m...core-ios-share
'For Pay' article..
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 09-18-2019, 10:32 AM
pobrien pobrien is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 246
no paywall

Peter,

I was able to read the article without any difficulty.
perhaps try it again. It was interesting on several fronts.

it is a sad and troubling story, no question.

Patrick
Reply With Quote
  #219  
Old 09-18-2019, 11:00 AM
glepore glepore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Charlottesville Va
Posts: 2,454
NYT gives a few free articles a month, then its pay.

The guy who wrote the piece-William Langewiesche- can really write. His book on the post 9/11 work at ground zero is brilliant, and as was "Fly by Wire" and the recent piece in the NYT on Malaysia Air.
Reply With Quote
  #220  
Old 09-18-2019, 11:13 AM
deechee deechee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,488
If you don't want to delete your cookies & history, just install another browser and open the NYtimes. Hopefully Chrome will fix their incognito loophole soon: https://www.blog.google/outreach-ini...owsing-chrome/
Reply With Quote
  #221  
Old 09-18-2019, 11:20 AM
FlashUNC FlashUNC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 14,452
Or subscribe. Pay for quality journalism.

William Langewiesche's coverage of these kinds of disasters is always appointment reading.

Here's his story about the sinking of the Estonia: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine...-story/302940/
Reply With Quote
  #222  
Old 09-22-2019, 10:12 PM
marciero marciero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Portland Maine
Posts: 3,108
Actually read a hard, paper, tactile copy in the Sunday Magazine.
Wow. Incredible story, writing, and analysis-on technical, human, and geo-economic fronts.
Reply With Quote
  #223  
Old 09-22-2019, 10:58 PM
bobdenver1961 bobdenver1961 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 281
I would not call the New York Times quality journalism.....just sayin....
Reply With Quote
  #224  
Old 09-23-2019, 01:27 AM
pbarry pbarry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,379
NYT has a $4 a month basic subscription, at least for the first year.
Reply With Quote
  #225  
Old 09-23-2019, 02:46 AM
saab2000's Avatar
saab2000 saab2000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobdenver1961 View Post
I would not call the New York Times quality journalism.....just sayin....
Have you ever actually spent time reading the NYT or is this reaction just a repeat of what someone on a TV channel said?

Anyone who has ever actually spent time reading a NYT will quickly realize that most of their content is actually really well researched and well written and the overwhelming majority of their content isn’t partisan or political.

This reaction sounds like something a TV host on a certain network or radio host might say....

Last edited by saab2000; 09-23-2019 at 06:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.