Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-17-2019, 12:01 PM
trener1 trener1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,010
Crank length question

I am in the process of building up a gravel bike and am thinking about crank lengths.
I have always ridden a 172.5 but the trend now seems to be going to shorter cranks, how would going to a 170 or maybe even a 167.5 feel?.
Anyone do this?.
I am more of a spinner then a masher even on my road bike.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-17-2019, 12:04 PM
zmalwo zmalwo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,441
shorter cranks = less stress injury. shorter the better until you runs our of gears... *If you don't race. Shimano gave us 160mm option on 105 cranks this generation might as well try it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-17-2019, 12:07 PM
trener1 trener1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,010
Thanks for responding.
Can you expound on your last 2 points?
Until you run out of gears.
If you don't race.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-17-2019, 12:45 PM
Hilltopperny's Avatar
Hilltopperny Hilltopperny is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Lassellsville NY
Posts: 9,863
I have a bunch of bikes with 172.5 and 170mm. I like the 170 for my gravel/allroad bikes and am currently using it on three of my builds right now. Two are gravel bikes set up 1x and the other is my winter roadie.

I like the 170mm set up with compact or sub compact gearing. It seems a bit easier on the knees.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-17-2019, 12:50 PM
cribbit cribbit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by zmalwo View Post
shorter cranks = less stress injury. shorter the better until you runs our of gears... *If you don't race. Shimano gave us 160mm option on 105 cranks this generation might as well try it.
Shouldn't it be the opposite since you have better leverage with longer?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-17-2019, 01:55 PM
Joe Remi Joe Remi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 211
Thumbs down

I've always ridden 170 on road and dirt and recently switched to 165. It's better.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-17-2019, 04:15 PM
Ken Robb Ken Robb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: La Jolla, Ca.
Posts: 16,048
We have quite a few threads on crank length in the archives.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-17-2019, 05:31 PM
charliedid's Avatar
charliedid charliedid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by trener1 View Post
I am in the process of building up a gravel bike and am thinking about crank lengths.
I have always ridden a 172.5 but the trend now seems to be going to shorter cranks, how would going to a 170 or maybe even a 167.5 feel?.
Anyone do this?.
I am more of a spinner then a masher even on my road bike.
Nobody can answer this question but you. All you can do is try it. You might like it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-17-2019, 05:32 PM
charliedid's Avatar
charliedid charliedid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Robb View Post
We have quite a few threads on crank length in the archives.
LOL

So all the threads in the archives hold all knowledge, facts and wisdom?

We should just close this place.

Sigh
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-17-2019, 06:45 PM
Ken Robb Ken Robb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: La Jolla, Ca.
Posts: 16,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by charliedid View Post
LOL

So all the threads in the archives hold all knowledge, facts and wisdom?

We should just close this place.

Sigh
I didn't say that but it's a good place to start looking for info on this topic.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-17-2019, 07:15 PM
R3awak3n's Avatar
R3awak3n R3awak3n is offline
aka RAEKWON
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC // Catskills, NY
Posts: 14,688
I have to say, I feel no difference whatsoever btw 170, 172.5 and 175s. They all work great for me.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-17-2019, 08:01 PM
pasadena pasadena is offline
DELETE ACCNT
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,382
Track sprinters like Hoy ran 165's
2500w sprints at 75kph.
Yes, track needs to prevent pedal strike, but if longer cranks were faster, they would certainly use them.

Try shorter cranks, they may help you get more aero and improve your fit.
If you don't have those concerns, you might not notice much difference

Going between my track bike (165) and road (used to use 172.5) I felt a huge difference.
I now use 170s and love them, though am thinking of going 165 and getting more aero.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-17-2019, 08:22 PM
vincenz vincenz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 855
Some people can tell the difference and some can’t. I could tell going from 172.5 to 170, but only slightly. I don’t have long legs. May be different for you. Only way to know would be to try.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-18-2019, 03:26 AM
charliedid's Avatar
charliedid charliedid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Robb View Post
I didn't say that but it's a good place to start looking for info on this topic.
Nothing personal Ken.

The whole "search the archives thing" just always strikes me as a bit of a non-answer. I guess a link would be more useful...

Imagine walking into a restaurant and asking the server "what's good today?" and they tell you to read the menu.

:-)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-18-2019, 07:50 AM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Remi View Post
I've always ridden 170 on road and dirt and recently switched to 165. It's better.
I've always ridden on 170 and got 175...it's better'...

Put 3 people in a room and ask about crank length and 4 or 5 'opinions'..Unless there is a physiological reason to have one or another..there is no answer, no formula, no equation that means this one or that one is 'better'...
Quote:
Nobody can answer this question but you. All you can do is try it. You might like it.
What he said..
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.