#61
|
||||
|
||||
Vintage bike nostalgia is so trite.
What bikes other people prefer is of exactly zero consequence to me. Ride a bike. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Product design people these days, from autos to bike parts, grew up on watching a little too much Transformers cartoons.
I like my bike parts shiny and with graceful curves and I cannot lie. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
I don't know about ugly, but I don't care for shimano securing the rear derailleur cable behind the derailleur and so close to the spokes.
If I wanted to sound like a motorcycle I would have used a playing card |
#64
|
||||
|
||||
But holy moly it works so damn well. I'm never goin back to my old school...
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
I tuck it inside the rear derailleur. On the back of the parallelogram is some hexagonal holes. I put the crimp in the hole and it stays there. Doesn't put stress on the inner wire either. |
#66
|
||||
|
||||
Works a treat IMO
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
It's All Good
Quote:
For me it's never been a narrow, one way affair for me. I like some old things, some new things, I find beauty and value in all of it. And that goes for other things too. I can appreciate a 67 Vette and an Audi RS5, a Harley Davidson Road King and a Ducati Panigale V4. And as for bicycles, if you dig around enough you can pretty much have whatever flavor you want, used, handmade, heck, some brands even still make steel bikes. Are new group sets as pretty as the shiny kit of years ago? Not in my opinion but modern group sets have the proper aesthetic for modern bikes. They look right on today's bikes. In the end I like it all, the classic steel lugged bike will always look right to me. The new aero shaped tubes bikes with no cables and wires showing look good too. |
#68
|
||||
|
||||
And yet you replied anyway.
__________________
It's not an adventure until something goes wrong. - Yvon C. |
#69
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry I should have answered your original question. No.
|
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Yup I repositioned the cable
I do admit that it's the best shifting I've had, especially the front derailleur |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
No.
The mid-80s stuff was made to exactly the same standard as the stuff is today -- the best materials on hand suited for the purpose. The 4 arm stuff is every bit the curvaceous wonders that the 80's fetish objects are. They're just carbon instead of alloy with a more brutalist bent. Whether it's to someone's personal taste is another matter. |
#72
|
||||
|
||||
Yes and no
Welcome to Paceline !
In my eyes Shimano has got very a attractive "industrial" sort of look that I like, black or dark gray, functional and business like. Campagnolo tries too hard to add their "Italian" flair which detracts from the appearance. Please understand this is my opinion, to each their own, Ride what you like but ride. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
I think it was a trick question as they both suck so neither could be a Campy Compare (before fans of either get twisted yes I'm joking...a little )
|
#74
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'm more of a Helen Hunt kinda guy.
__________________
It's not an adventure until something goes wrong. - Yvon C. |
#75
|
||||
|
||||
Yes and no.
Campy 15+ SR with 15- cranks looks great, and works better than the old '80's stuff. I never cared for the C generation groups as they were heavy. Bikes checked in at 22+ lbs! At the time I went the other way with Mavic SSC. My 58cm SLX bike was 18 lbs and climbed fast. I will admit, I do like Dura Ace 7400. It's a clean looking group that worked well. My favorite is perhaps Campy Record 10 with aluminum cranks. Beautiful! |
|
|