Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:11 AM
R3awak3n's Avatar
R3awak3n R3awak3n is offline
aka RAEKWON
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC // Catskills, NY
Posts: 14,688
Forget the green, the yellow is where its at.

So many great new options right now and much cheaper than OPEN. I love my open though, one or my favorite bikes I have ever owned but if it was today i probably would go for something cheaper since its available.

This santa cruz looks awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:18 AM
Jaybee Jaybee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: 303
Posts: 4,311
The drop chainstay was pretty revolutionary for this category. OPEN gets the credit for that, right?

Very into this bike (in both colors!) but there are a lot of competitors in the carbon, clearance for 2.1, drop bar category now. Not sure if I would do this or a Hakka MX or the Norco for the price.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:37 AM
Aldus Aldus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Louisville
Posts: 64
One of these + 2 sets of wheels (road and cx/gravel) would basically do everything I want before I'd reach for the MTB.

Might have to give them a close look this fall.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:42 AM
sparky33's Avatar
sparky33 sparky33 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Wellesley, MA
Posts: 3,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaybee View Post
The drop chainstay was pretty revolutionary for this category. OPEN gets the credit for that, right?
Clever.
Yes and no. The dropped chainstay has been around, but Vroomen and company popularized it as a solutions for gravel bikes.

https://www.bikehugger.com/posts/mar...ped-chainstay/
__________________
Steve Park

Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:52 AM
sparky33's Avatar
sparky33 sparky33 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Wellesley, MA
Posts: 3,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaybee View Post
Very into this bike (in both colors!) but there are a lot of competitors in the carbon, clearance for 2.1, drop bar category now. Not sure if I would do this or a Hakka MX or the Norco for the price.
Gosh, that's a tough one.
A vote in favor of Santa Cruz is that SC bikes ride super nice...snappy, light and remarkably/surprisingly comfortable. Also, they a super well made and durable. Nice to see that SC has joined the gravel party. I did shed a tiny tear for the former Stiggy CX concept.
A vote in favor of the Hakka MX is that it has a legit rear fender-bridge-mount (not a clip on bridge) and the Enve G Series fork that clears 2.25"
__________________
Steve Park

Instagram

Last edited by sparky33; 05-14-2019 at 09:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 05-14-2019, 09:19 AM
Jaybee Jaybee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: 303
Posts: 4,311
I know the Stiggy would be a great ride and last forever and their warranty is unbeatable - my MTB is Hightower, and I've got an older alloy Highball stashed at my parents. Nothing buy good things to say about Santa Cruz.

Of course, that list misses the beast I really want: Rodeo Labs TrailDonkey 3.0.

Not to thread jack too much, but if you haven't seen Switchup Donkey on the Instagrams, it's worth a look.

Also, thanks for that bikehugger link on the history of dropped chainstays. That Viking is wild!

Last edited by Jaybee; 05-14-2019 at 09:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 05-14-2019, 10:28 AM
scoobydrew scoobydrew is online now
shimergo
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,292
That yellow is hot.

Pretty strong contender against the Hakka MX. I like the added 3rd bottle mount and the revamped geometry.

Wish this came out a few months sooner before I got a new bike.

Last edited by scoobydrew; 05-14-2019 at 10:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 05-14-2019, 10:30 AM
yinzerniner yinzerniner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by sparky33 View Post
Gosh, that's a tough one.
A vote in favor of Santa Cruz is that SC bikes ride super nice...snappy, light and remarkably/surprisingly comfortable. Also, they a super well made and durable. Nice to see that SC has joined the gravel party. I did shed a tiny tear for the former Stiggy CX concept.
A vote in favor of the Hakka MX is that it has a legit rear fender-bridge-mount (not a clip on bridge) and the Enve G Series fork that clears 2.25"
When comparing my old 2017 Stigmata with a first-gen Open UP I felt the Stig was more comfy but slower handling from side to side. Don't know whether it was an effect of the fit not quite being dialed in (the previous gen Stig had a very steep seat tube angle) or a characteristic of the frame itself. Used exact same two sets of wheels on both.

That being said even though the frame weights were almost identical the Stig always felt more robust. Don't know whether this was due to bias from reading a few horror stories about the subpar carbon work on a few Open frames.

From the CT article it seems like the frameset gained some extra capability and a threaded BB for a few hundred grams of frame weight. 52cm size with ETAP Force AXS, 650B wheels/tires and Alu cockpit came in at 8.32kg. Could easily drop over kilo when kitted with carbon cockpit and road wheels.
https://cyclingtips.com/2019/05/2020...-tech-details/

That being said, the women's version is where it's at. Looks like an NAHBS show bike; JUST LOOK AT IT!


Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 05-14-2019, 10:46 AM
PaMtbRider PaMtbRider is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: York, Pa.
Posts: 2,397
I really like these bikes. A friend has a Stigmata and it is a typical quality Santa Cruz. The Juliana really looks good. I don't need 2.0 tires on a gravel bike though. It's nice that it has that much clearance, but if I need that much tire I'm just going to ride a hardtail mtb.

Did the Hakka Mx ever get their brakes figured out? They were running a combination of flat mount and post mount calipers.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 05-14-2019, 10:59 AM
scoobydrew scoobydrew is online now
shimergo
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaMtbRider View Post
Did the Hakka Mx ever get their brakes figured out? They were running a combination of flat mount and post mount calipers.
The latest ones are shipping out with flat mount front and rear.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 05-14-2019, 11:01 AM
adub adub is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 977
They got the tire clearance right, but what about a 3rd water bottle mount and top tube bento mounts? Ibis and Santa Cruz seemed to have missed this.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 05-14-2019, 11:25 AM
sparky33's Avatar
sparky33 sparky33 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Wellesley, MA
Posts: 3,940
Agreed. Win for Juliana on the finish.
Also, that front fork looks cavernous relative to that 27.5x2.0. I wonder if you could fit a 2.25 on the fork, similar to the Enve G-Series clearance. Stated capacity of 2.1 might only be referring to the rear limit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by yinzerniner View Post
That being said, the women's version is where it's at. Looks like an NAHBS show bike; JUST LOOK AT IT!

__________________
Steve Park

Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 05-14-2019, 11:34 AM
sparky33's Avatar
sparky33 sparky33 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Wellesley, MA
Posts: 3,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by sparky33 View Post
Also, that front fork looks cavernous relative to that 27.5x2.0. I wonder if you could fit a 2.25 on the fork, similar to the Enve G-Series clearance. Stated capacity of 2.1 might only be referring to the rear limit.
I take that back... these shots show how close a 2.0 is and the author goes on to say 2.1s are definitely the max.



__________________
Steve Park

Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 05-14-2019, 01:32 PM
Sjambok Sjambok is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 90
As an Open UP owner I’m seriously considering one of these framesets for the fender mounts. It’s my biggest complaint about the UP. Since I’m in the PNW a good fender setup is key. All the strap on fenders I’ve tried leave a lot to be desired. I haven’t tried the SKS speedrockers though.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 05-14-2019, 02:20 PM
alessandro's Avatar
alessandro alessandro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Vermont
Posts: 864
Quote:
Originally Posted by R3awak3n View Post
Forget the green, the yellow is where its at.

So many great new options right now and much cheaper than OPEN. I love my open though, one or my favorite bikes I have ever owned but if it was today i probably would go for something cheaper since its available.

This santa cruz looks awesome.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sjambok View Post
As an Open UP owner I’m seriously considering one of these framesets for the fender mounts. It’s my biggest complaint about the UP. Since I’m in the PNW a good fender setup is key. All the strap on fenders I’ve tried leave a lot to be desired. I haven’t tried the SKS speedrockers though.
I'm in the market for a gravel bike. I've been looking at bikes and frames (and screwing myself into the ceiling over 1x/2x chainrings, post vs. flat mount, 700c/650b, carbon vs. metal, BB standards...) for weeks now. Got most of those things sorted out, and decided to stop worrying. The only problem is WHICH BIKE?

I really want an OPEN U.P., but I haven't made a decision yet. A custom frame is a beyond budget. Ibis Hakka MX, Kona Libre, and Stigmata all look interesting. I'm traveling to France and Italy this summer, and will be renting an OPEN for the week, so at least I'll get to test one. But go ahead, tell me now: Why shouldn't I buy one?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.