Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 11-05-2021, 02:07 PM
Likes2ridefar Likes2ridefar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 6,851
I’d ignore the weight and consider safety first. An external battery while ugly lasts longer, generally, and almost always has much higher output.

For cheap I like magic shine. Lupine are excellent but expensive.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-05-2021, 02:28 PM
slowpoke slowpoke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Likes2ridefar View Post
I’d want nothing less than 1000 and frankly would go crazy if it’s not going to blind others. There is nothing wrong with a very well lit road while in the pain cave. Last thing to worry about is hitting debris or a pothole that is hard to see with lesser lights.
And this is why Germany has nice things like StVZO-regulated lights. So you can have bright lights without blinding oncoming traffic.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-05-2021, 03:16 PM
Andy sti Andy sti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 2,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Likes2ridefar View Post
Surprised to see the less than 1000 even 500?? Recommended lights.

I would outride that lumen easily cranking out intervals in the dark. I’d want nothing less than 1000 and frankly would go crazy if it’s not going to blind others. There is nothing wrong with a very well lit road while in the pain cave. Last thing to worry about is hitting debris or a pothole that is hard to see with lesser lights.

Finally some logic in these light threads. The light recommendations here always make me laugh. Also wish people would stop recommending a dyno light. It's a completely ridiculous recommendation for someone who wants a battery powered light for 2-3 times a week training rides.

I just got a light that is 2100+ lumen for 2.5ish hours. That gives me 5ish hours around 1400 lumen - now that is a usable light. I can't imagine doing any riding with a 500 lumen light.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-05-2021, 03:32 PM
charliedid's Avatar
charliedid charliedid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy sti View Post
Finally some logic in these light threads. The light recommendations here always make me laugh. Also wish people would stop recommending a dyno light. It's a completely ridiculous recommendation for someone who wants a battery powered light for 2-3 times a week training rides.

I just got a light that is 2100+ lumen for 2.5ish hours. That gives me 5ish hours around 1400 lumen - now that is a usable light. I can't imagine doing any riding with a 500 lumen light.
500 lumen lights are for commuting in lit urban areas IMO
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-05-2021, 04:25 PM
Clean39T Clean39T is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 19,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy sti View Post
Finally some logic in these light threads. The light recommendations here always make me laugh. Also wish people would stop recommending a dyno light. It's a completely ridiculous recommendation for someone who wants a battery powered light for 2-3 times a week training rides.

I just got a light that is 2100+ lumen for 2.5ish hours. That gives me 5ish hours around 1400 lumen - now that is a usable light. I can't imagine doing any riding with a 500 lumen light.

Does it require a secret handshake? Wut doin?
__________________
Io non posso vivere senza la mia strada e la mia bici -- DP
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-05-2021, 04:37 PM
Ozz's Avatar
Ozz Ozz is offline
I need you cool.
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Swellevue, WA
Posts: 7,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy sti View Post
...
I just got a light that is 2100+ lumen for 2.5ish hours. That gives me 5ish hours around 1400 lumen - now that is a usable light. I can't imagine doing any riding with a 500 lumen light.
External battery or self-contained?

I am not a fan of external batteries. I had them on first few lights I purchase (L&M HID, Seca and Stella). Didn't need lights on all my rides, and wrapping excess power cords was a PITA. Self contained works best for me.

My rides are urban (always leave from my front door) so I have streetlights helping me out most of the route. I run a Taz 1500 for "seeing", and a Lezyne Zecto for "being seen" up front, and a Planet Bike SuperFlash and Vis 180 Pro in back....
__________________
2003 CSi / Legend Ti / Seven 622 SLX
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-05-2021, 04:49 PM
sg8357 sg8357 is offline
Forward the Foundation
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Highland Heights, Kehn-Tuck-ee
Posts: 2,754
L&M make go-pro mount that replaces the rubber strap on the Urban series.

https://lightandmotion.com/products/...ount-urban-vya

I split the diff, an L&M 1000fc and a B&M IQ-X using a SON dyno.

The L&M puts out more light, the IQ-X puts the light out farther.
I'm using the same dyno as I used back in dual halogen days,
now on the 4th gen of led Dyno lights.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-05-2021, 05:10 PM
pelicanrando's Avatar
pelicanrando pelicanrando is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 49
I have a dyno on my rando bike with an IQ-X, but decided to go with battery lights for my road bike. I landed on a Fenix BC21R for my purposes (mostly short rides, but up to 600k rando). It has swappable batteries so you can bring multiple batteries on long events. This is the biggest advantage of the Fenix vs. the L&M rando 500.

It has 4 brightness levels, and you can charge it while riding and running it on the lowest level (which is plenty bright for climbing, barely bright enough for flats and waaay too dim for descents). It has decent optics that put most of the light down onto the road. The beam pattern sucks compared to an IQ-X, but all battery lights are a compromise when compared to dyno. I run it on the 2nd lowest setting most of the time, and turn it up higher on descents or fast sections.

I've been pretty happy with it overall, and did a 600k in May with it so lots of night riding. Also, it's quite light when compared to dyno systems.

Last edited by pelicanrando; 11-05-2021 at 05:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-05-2021, 06:59 PM
merlincustom1 merlincustom1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elkins Park PA
Posts: 834
www.outboundlighting.com. Best light I’ve had in 30+ years of riding. American company. The founder was a former auto headlight designer. The Road Edition is designed with a cutoff to not blind oncoming drivers, so all of the lumens go in the right place and not off into space. No hot spot. The beam is wide and the color is pleasing to the eye. 5 settings, long run times, 3 year warranty. Much better than the Niterider, Airsteam Supernova, Exposure Strada, and others that I’ve had. Highly recommend.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-05-2021, 07:55 PM
NHAero NHAero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 9,589
This is the one I use as well. No question I'm not riding repeats as Clean intends, nor do I live where I'm going to be descending long and fast. I like how easy it is to move bike to bike, it's lightweight, and I have a flashlight and a headlamp from Fenix, all using the same 18650 battery so I have spares.

Great customer service too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pelicanrando View Post
I have a dyno on my rando bike with an IQ-X, but decided to go with battery lights for my road bike. I landed on a Fenix BC21R for my purposes (mostly short rides, but up to 600k rando). It has swappable batteries so you can bring multiple batteries on long events. This is the biggest advantage of the Fenix vs. the L&M rando 500.

It has 4 brightness levels, and you can charge it while riding and running it on the lowest level (which is plenty bright for climbing, barely bright enough for flats and waaay too dim for descents). It has decent optics that put most of the light down onto the road. The beam pattern sucks compared to an IQ-X, but all battery lights are a compromise when compared to dyno. I run it on the 2nd lowest setting most of the time, and turn it up higher on descents or fast sections.

I've been pretty happy with it overall, and did a 600k in May with it so lots of night riding. Also, it's quite light when compared to dyno systems.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-05-2021, 08:15 PM
Andy sti Andy sti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 2,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozz View Post
External battery or self-contained?

I am not a fan of external batteries. I had them on first few lights I purchase (L&M HID, Seca and Stella). Didn't need lights on all my rides, and wrapping excess power cords was a PITA. Self contained works best for me.

My rides are urban (always leave from my front door) so I have streetlights helping me out most of the route. I run a Taz 1500 for "seeing", and a Lezyne Zecto for "being seen" up front, and a Planet Bike SuperFlash and Vis 180 Pro in back....
External battery but it fits easily in a small bar bag - so now it's cool.

My town is dark and has made efforts to reduce light pollution. I also ride in rural areas without street lights. I want a light to see with. I also have daylight lights but if i'm out for 90+ minutes I want to have see.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-05-2021, 08:16 PM
Andy sti Andy sti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 2,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clean39T View Post
Does it require a secret handshake? Wut doin?
I grabbed the Dinotte light. So far it's been great.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-05-2021, 11:58 PM
Clean39T Clean39T is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 19,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy sti View Post
I grabbed the Dinotte light. So far it's been great.
Pricing on the Dinotte isn't bad really, not for the manufacturing quality you get.

I commuted for a few years with an Urban 500 in Med/Low - it wasn't always fun, but I lived. Actually riding to enjoy things is a different story. And it's gotta be a lot safer to actually be able to see potholes before you're in them.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-06-2021, 05:04 AM
smontanaro smontanaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 1,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clean39T View Post
AAny other good options that might be mountable to a K-Edge Go-Pro mount?
Corollary question: Are light mounts beginning to standardize with the dominance of Garmin products for bikes? I haven't purchased anything in several years, but I always found it particularly annoying that every company has their own mount "standard," really just lock-in. I don't think I have ever found two companies' handlebar light mounts to be compatible.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-06-2021, 07:16 AM
Ozz's Avatar
Ozz Ozz is offline
I need you cool.
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Swellevue, WA
Posts: 7,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by smontanaro View Post
Corollary question: Are light mounts beginning to standardize with the dominance of Garmin products for bikes? I haven't purchased anything in several years, but I always found it particularly annoying that every company has their own mount "standard," really just lock-in. I don't think I have ever found two companies' handlebar light mounts to be compatible.
One of the things I really like about L&M lights is that they are mounted with rubber straps....easy on and off, and you aren't left with a mount on your bike when you don't need a light.
__________________
2003 CSi / Legend Ti / Seven 622 SLX
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.