#31
|
||||
|
||||
That must have been one epic race. That photo is awesome.
__________________
http://less-than-epic.blogspot.com/ |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
I find these quantities of solvents daunting to be honest. I might rather buy more chains. And coincidentally I have mostly KMC chains, so I've lost the game already. I'm about to install an Izumi on the Nagasawa and a Shimano 105 on the Litespeed, so I'll see if those seem easier to initially clean. I do note that the SRAM chain on my MTB, which likely sees the most adverse conditions, has remained cleanest of all the chains on my bikes, all of which are lubed with Squirt.
Quote:
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Wet lube, similarly, has zero void, but because it is stirred throughout the chain under articulation, it will pull outside contaminates into the inside of the chain in wet or muddy conditions. For this reason, ZFC says that you need to clean and re-lube your chain after ALL wet or wet/muddy rides no matter what lube you are using, not just wax. To me the only downside of wax is the extra work required up front in the cleaning. This is why we developed Synergetic, it's nearly all the performance of SuperSecret (and slightly better in wear actually), but in a wet lube that's faster/easier to use. The only downside to Synergetic is that it's ~0.5w slower than SuperSecret and ~0.8w slower than SILCA hot melt, but it's still faster than MSW or really just about anything else out there. Funny enough, the MucOff Ludicrous AF lube used Synergetic as their 'best in class' benchmark showing that they can beat it by ~0.1w in their launch material. |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
I'm not into waxing my chain, but I went a little way down the non-wax rabbit hole, and the Silca NFS seems to be pretty darn good. Arguably the best non-wax. I'm pretty sure that I don't have any, but I'll pick up some next time.
https://cyclingtips.com/2018/03/fast...ves-you-money/
__________________
It's not an adventure until something goes wrong. - Yvon C. |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
At the moment, independent testing by ZFC shows that honor to belong to Silca Synergetic.
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Josh, thank you for your contributions to this thread (and others).
What is the initial cleaning regimen required for the Synergetic lube? Quote:
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by Likes2ridefar; 11-05-2021 at 10:17 AM. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
For those that are using the drip lube, when the chain needs relubing, do you clean the chain first, or just drip the lube on? I assume the chain stays pretty clean with this lube and maybe a wipe down through a rag is all that's necessary.
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
My chain stays spotless all the time with only a very casual wipe after every ride or two. I just swap entire chains rather than reapplying. It’s easier to just dunk them in a mason jar and less mess.
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Wow, that's a lot of trouble for a chain. I couldn't imagine spending that much time messing about with a chain.
Although, I guess that pic is a testament to when it is worth it! |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
I thought the same but it’s actually less work in the long run. At least if you prefer a well maintained and clean drivetrain.
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
I use the Silca SS wax on my road bike. the CX bike gets the Synergetic. Pretty sure nothing would have helped my gear train last weekend at the Orchard Cross race in NH.
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
When they say "immerse" they don't mean the whole bike in schmutz!
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
With the cost and limited availability of parts, I have found it really makes sense if you ride a decent amount. Quote:
Not cleaning out the factory gunk from a chain, regardless of lube choice, means you’re gonna be tossing your chain at 1000-2000km intervals. So realistically between 3-6 chains for 1 that you use some solvents on. |
|
|