#1921
|
||||
|
||||
I'm glad to see Peyton get one last shot at it and I don't like the Patriots at all. But I gotta say, that was as amazing as anything I've ever seen Brady do. With the kind of pressure he was under all day, to pull off that last drive, twice really, spending as much time as he did on his back. True, Denver was down both starting safeties, but still, crazy impressive act of pure will. Damn, that game was EPIC!
-Ray
__________________
Don't buy upgrades - ride up grades |
#1922
|
|||
|
|||
|
#1923
|
|||
|
|||
Dude, you totally called it. That defense was ferocious. Good luck in Santa Clara.
|
#1924
|
|||
|
|||
I totally agree. Two GREAT defenses playing incredible football.
|
#1925
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Regardless of that outcome, I'll enjoy this victory for awhile. NE beats Miami at the end of the year, and this is in Foxboro, this is a different outcome IMO. BUT I'LL TAKE IT Wish they had some semblance of an offense to go with that defense.
__________________
Mr. Bob Dobalina |
#1926
|
||||
|
||||
The denver pass rush made the patriots offensive line look like a JV team. Or the patriots offensive line made the denver pass rush look like champions.
That was the story of the game and the root of most of the key plays. Although, I'm still not sure how that Aqib Tallib can hold Gronkowski in the end zone and not get called for it... That was the only really big missed call that I saw.
__________________
And we have just one world, But we live in different ones |
#1927
|
|||
|
|||
It was a hold, I agree. And it didn't matter. Gronk, though a mutant, wasn't going to out-jump the defense for that ball.
|
#1928
|
|||
|
|||
Home field matters. Pats loss to Eagles came back to bite them. That said, Denver's D line ate Pats O line alive. And Wade Phillips out-coached Josh McDaniels. We had no effective offensive game plan. And yes, Manning outplayed Brady. Who would have thought the QB with two picks would have been Tom?
One shining light for Pats was their D. It matched Denver's D drive for drive. Pats O didn't measure up. |
#1929
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
-Ray
__________________
Don't buy upgrades - ride up grades |
#1930
|
|||
|
|||
I'm sorry, I can't be convinced that the Broncos are a super bowl team. The game against the stealers was a mess and this game was a mess. This was more of a Pats lost it rather than Denver won it.
The Broncos D works against Rothersburger and Brady 2 of the slowest QBs in the league. No chance against Newton in a neutral field. Patriots really didn't look incredible - they lost a few games that should have been a wash - I wish they got it, but I'm not crying. Newton is gonna make Payton look like the elder statesman he is. |
#1931
|
|||
|
|||
They are good. But last year's Seattle D was pretty good too, yet somehow the Pats O line handled them better. I wonder (not that it matters) how much was good D vs bad O line? Never seen Brady that harassed. Denver did it often with just 3 rushers. Can't 5 O linemen block 3 guys? Ours couldn't. Hope Pats upgrade the O line in the off season.
|
#1932
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Wouldn't underestimate the affect of playing at altitude. It's real Those are big boys on the offensive line. That dime that Brady dropped to Gronk (the big gain) at the end...as well as waiting for him to fight open in the end zone speaks to how great of a competitor he is.
__________________
Mr. Bob Dobalina |
#1933
|
|||
|
|||
Whatever, Patriots were already predicted in Vegas to win the SB, prior to the actual game today. Newton would have made the Pats look like chumps, if they actually won. Oh yeah, as far as the postseason goes: it's 3 to 2, Peyton vs Tom. If you include both Mannings then it's 5 to 2.
|
#1934
|
|||
|
|||
Agree. Brady has the label of a pretty boy/the golden boy, but he's a fighter. He never quits. That pass to Gronk was great, maybe his best of the day. I'm glad the Pats hung in there until the end. Denver was landing body blows all day. The boys could have quit. They didn't.
|
#1935
|
|||
|
|||
Brady alone has 4 rings - Manning brothers have 3. My math isn't good, but I think 4 rings by one person is more than 3 rings combined from 2 people.
|
|
|