Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2022, 11:57 AM
Keith A's Avatar
Keith A Keith A is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Space Coast of FL
Posts: 18,101
Dura-Ace brakes 9100 vs 9000

Quick question. I thought I read somewhere that the 9100's rim brakes had more clearance than the 9000's. Does anyone know if this is true? If so, any idea how much difference there is?

TIA.
__________________
My '96 CSi & compact CSi
The Paceline . . . Enjoy the ride.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-07-2022, 12:22 PM
Blown Reek Blown Reek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,675
According to Shimano, the max rim width for both the 9000 and 9100 series rim brake is 28mm. Don't know if that helps, though.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-07-2022, 01:08 PM
Wunder Wunder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 293
Can't speak to those but I have 6800 and 8000 Ultegra calipers which are basically an identical design. The 8000 definitely has a more open arch that more easily clears a large labeled 28 (measured 30 or 31) than the 6800. It's not huge but if your frame otherwise allows the 2nd gen 11 speed caliper should give you an extra 2mm of clearance or so. This really only matters at the margins though where you are trying to fit a measured 31mm tire under a short reach caliper brake and your frame is optimized for that.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-07-2022, 01:33 PM
Keith A's Avatar
Keith A Keith A is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Space Coast of FL
Posts: 18,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wunder View Post
Can't speak to those but I have 6800 and 8000 Ultegra calipers which are basically an identical design. The 8000 definitely has a more open arch that more easily clears a large labeled 28 (measured 30 or 31) than the 6800. It's not huge but if your frame otherwise allows the 2nd gen 11 speed caliper should give you an extra 2mm of clearance or so. This really only matters at the margins though where you are trying to fit a measured 31mm tire under a short reach caliper brake and your frame is optimized for that.
Thanks for the information. Yes, I would assume that the 6800/8000 difference would be the same as the 9000/9100.
__________________
My '96 CSi & compact CSi
The Paceline . . . Enjoy the ride.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-07-2022, 01:58 PM
prototoast prototoast is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 5,851
I measured a few of my calipers (6800, 9000, 7000, 8000). The limiting factor on both comes around the pivots. On the first gen (6800, 9000) I measure the minimum gap at around 32mm. On the second gen (7000, 8000) I measure the minimum gap at around 35mm. So it seems like there is a slight advantage to the newer gen calipers, but it's pretty small.
__________________
Instagram - DannAdore Bicycles
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-07-2022, 02:00 PM
Keith A's Avatar
Keith A Keith A is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Space Coast of FL
Posts: 18,101
prototoast -- Thanks for checking this!
__________________
My '96 CSi & compact CSi
The Paceline . . . Enjoy the ride.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-07-2022, 02:26 PM
robt57 robt57 is offline
NJ/NashV/PDX
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PDX
Posts: 8,434
Unorthodox, yes. But I have J/B weld DIYed rear Breezer dropouts [4mm] and added a longer reach fork & BR-650 calipers for more fat tire greed with success. It also shortens the effective RD hanger length, be aware.

Caliper wise, I think BR-5800 are good candidates. No part of the caliper hangs lower than the center at the attachment as I recall. Not even lower than the fork or brake bridge...
__________________
This foot tastes terrible!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-07-2022, 04:30 PM
NHAero NHAero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 9,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith A View Post
Quick question. I thought I read somewhere that the 9100's rim brakes had more clearance than the 9000's. Does anyone know if this is true? If so, any idea how much difference there is?

TIA.
Can you say which clearance number you're seeking? I have 9000 series on the Firefly and could take a measurement if helpful. Rims are Easton R90SL.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-08-2022, 07:02 AM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith A View Post
Quick question. I thought I read somewhere that the 9100's rim brakes had more clearance than the 9000's. Does anyone know if this is true? If so, any idea how much difference there is?

TIA.
Yup, a hundred more...
Sorry, just some lame humor after reading thru some of the current threads. Geez, seems people are pretty uptight these days, even about toys.
Tis the Season, I guess.
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-08-2022, 08:50 AM
ryker ryker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith A View Post
Quick question. I thought I read somewhere that the 9100's rim brakes had more clearance than the 9000's. Does anyone know if this is true? If so, any idea how much difference there is?
I haven't read anything like that. The closest I can remember is Alberto Contador preferred 9000 brakes with his 9100 groupset. His concerns related to on-the-fly adjustments rather than clearance, however.
__________________
ryan | islandix instruments
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-08-2022, 09:09 AM
BdaGhisallo's Avatar
BdaGhisallo BdaGhisallo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bermuda
Posts: 2,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryker View Post
I haven't read anything like that. The closest I can remember is Alberto Contador preferred 9000 brakes with his 9100 groupset. His concerns related to on-the-fly adjustments rather than clearance, however.
It was the traditional quick release on the 9000 calipers that he wanted so that he could open the rear brake when climbing to account for flex in the rear wheel. With the 9100 qr, it is either fully engaged or fully off.
__________________
"Progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." - Robert Heinlein
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-08-2022, 11:15 AM
Keith A's Avatar
Keith A Keith A is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Space Coast of FL
Posts: 18,101
NHAero - Thanks for the offer. I'd like to pick up some brake calipers for a 91xx group and was curious if there was much difference between the 9000 and 9100 ones.

oldpotatoe - That was funny.

ryker & BdaGhisallo - Thanks for that info.
__________________
My '96 CSi & compact CSi
The Paceline . . . Enjoy the ride.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-12-2022, 07:35 AM
Gabe77 Gabe77 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 78
There is one diff between 9000 & 9100 (and 9200 since they are identical) - the spring tension adjustment still exists on the 9000, they did away with it on 9100. The clearance looks the same to me, both have so much you can run any tyre that will fit on a racing bike. 9000s have a release that is much easier to operate with gloved hands in the wet. I'd say the prior one is actually technically superior.
Prediction - 9200 will be the last rim braked DA ever. This is the only DA series brake that is identical to the previous series, all prior have had redesigns & improvements. Shimano have put in zero development into this component - likely because it will not be continued in production.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.