#31
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
š»* |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Lugged carbon frames will always be better constructed than monocoque frames.
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Prove UR right.
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Texbike |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
That C64 is gorgeous. Far better looking than the "melting " look of the tubes of the Pinarello. The Pinarello gets great accolades though. I just prefer more traditional looks I guess.
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
It's not the machine, it's the motor.
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
I remember the first Colnago I ever saw, probably around '73 or so. Walked into a bike shop and there it was, sitting in the middle of the floor. There was an otherworldly light surrounding it and I swear I heard the faint sound of angels singing.
Unfortunately, that bike was destroyed when it was being transported around in a van and a big pile of bike lockers fell on it |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
In this case the 3 motors were heavily modified... Full EPO chips and tuning.
__________________
Cheers...Daryl Life is too important to be taken seriously |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Sent from my moto z3 using Tapatalk |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
I would think that the pinnacle of engineering with CF would be a shaped monocoque structure rather than lugs and tubes. The advantage is putting the material where it does the most work, without duplication. So I'd question that a lug and tube design would be the best CF frame.
The analog in aluminum are the Cannondale frames like my old CAAD 10, where the members were so heavily shaped, no longer constant cross section tubes (whether round or square or twisted like the Lynskeys) |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
I think the advantages of monocoque over lug and tube are a little overblown from a structural point of view. They make the monocoque frames out of pieces anyway, they just paper over the joints.
Can't argue with the aesthetics though |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Ernesto Colnagoās achievements in cycling and his innovation over the decades should be enough to quiet some of the scorn in this thread.
Colnago bikes have always been desirable since I got into bikes in the early 1980s and they remain so today. They have been relevant for decades, winning races at the highest level on all terrains. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Not taking personal shot at proud Colnago owners here, but I had a Master Light, worst riding bike I ever owned, hands down. Like a go cart is how I would describe it. Very low BB, just an awful racing bike, which is how it was branded. And it weighed nearly a ton, I called it my Master Heavy! . Also, I seem to recall another brash Italian boasting about the ābest bikeā and although it began w/letter C, it was as far off from a Colnago as one could get!
https://i.pinimg.com/474x/ce/e4/ba/c...io-history.jpg
__________________
Why Science? You can test it silly! Last edited by laupsi; 01-11-2020 at 05:54 PM. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Do not, sold it in ā92
__________________
Why Science? You can test it silly! |
|
|