#1
|
||||
|
||||
OT: Mustang Mach E
It's a Ford. It's electric.
But it's not a Mustang. Discuss. (It actually traces its lineage to my 1974 Pinto Hatchback.)
__________________
©2004 The Elefantino Corp. All rights reserved. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
77 mustang, but 4 doors?
i do agree, not a mustang for me either. I would have named it something else or even Taurus electric just to keep the name still out there. How much is going to be?? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ford put themselves in a bit of a box by canceling all US cars that aren't the Mustang.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I've read that it's an SUV so why even use the "Mustang" name for it?
It being an EV is the least un-Mustangy thing about it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I was a pretty devout Ford person up until last year. Their business/market decisions are just puzzling and terrible.
My '79 Cobra project will soon find a new home, and when my '91 F150 dies, it will not be replaced with a Ford (if I bother to replace it all. Trucks are handy, but....) Currently looking at 2008-2011 Challenger R/T and SRT's for a fun daily. Maligning the "Mach" name with that thing is just another poor marketing idea. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Ford has a poor history of dragging respected names through the mud. It usually takes them a few years to right those wrongs...
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
W. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Says Mustang on it clear as day.
Where's the confusion? |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Looks more like a Mazda than a Mustang.
W. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
©2004 The Elefantino Corp. All rights reserved. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Ford used to own 1/3 of Mazda, so that makes some semblance of sense...
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Let's be done with it and just call it Edsel II.
__________________
Why don't we do it in the road? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
#14
|
|||
|
|||
It has an ugly "face"
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
No radiator...no need for a grill.
|
|
|