Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 08-18-2019, 03:24 PM
buddybikes buddybikes is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Northeast USA
Posts: 4,035
... little cheaper than what you found

https://www.ebay.com/p/Tubolito-Tubo...xoC-ggQAvD_BwE
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 08-18-2019, 06:05 PM
stephenmarklay stephenmarklay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 5,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveandbarb1 View Post
... little cheaper than what you found

https://www.ebay.com/p/Tubolito-Tubo...xoC-ggQAvD_BwE

At that price I may pick one up for a spare.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 08-19-2019, 10:25 AM
Mark McM Mark McM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by pritchet74 View Post
Some rolling resistance data on the tubolito tubes...

https://www.aero-coach.co.uk/inner-t...ing-resistance
It's too bad that the Aero Coach web site didn't also include the Continental Supersonic tubes. These tubes weigh just 50 grams (10 grams more than the Tubolitos), and are made of easily patched butyl. If we were to extrapolate from the rolling resistance of the Continental Race 28 (104g) and the Race 28 Lite (78g), it seems likely that the Supersonic tubes have less rolling resistance than the Tubolito tubes. And the Supersonic tubes are only about half the price of the Tubolitos. I'm not seeing any significant advantage to the Tubolitos.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 08-19-2019, 10:28 AM
etu etu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,055
As others have said, I think the real value is being able to carry a light tube for a tubeless setup. I ride a 29+ bike and the weight of a 29x2.3 tube was over 200gms compared to the reported 100gms for tubolitos. I suspect the 2.9x3 tube is closer to 300gms. So that's around 200gm savings in weight for around $30-40! Quite a value for weight weenies! Although I have admit, I don't worry so much about weight when I am riding on dirt on a 28lb bike.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 08-19-2019, 06:45 PM
Mikej Mikej is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McM View Post
It's too bad that the Aero Coach web site didn't also include the Continental Supersonic tubes. These tubes weigh just 50 grams (10 grams more than the Tubolitos), and are made of easily patched butyl. If we were to extrapolate from the rolling resistance of the Continental Race 28 (104g) and the Race 28 Lite (78g), it seems likely that the Supersonic tubes have less rolling resistance than the Tubolito tubes. And the Supersonic tubes are only about half the price of the Tubolitos. I'm not seeing any significant advantage to the Tubolitos.
You have to actually hold a 29er tubo to understand- it’s not the weight it’s the size for packing that make them attractive. My 29er tubes weigh 0g btw.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 59E966EF-FDAA-4701-908F-CC445A112AC3.jpg (70.3 KB, 89 views)
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 08-19-2019, 06:49 PM
joosttx's Avatar
joosttx joosttx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Larkspur, Ca
Posts: 7,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikej View Post
You have to actually hold a 29er tubo to understand- it’s not the weight it’s the size for packing that make them attractive. My 29er tubes weigh 0g btw.
I think that picture sums up why they are worth it.
__________________
***IG: mttamgrams***
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.