Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 02-20-2020, 02:41 PM
robertbb robertbb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 955
Thanks all.

Unfortunately neither F-C or BB drop are given for the frames. I've contacted manufacturers (both large multinationals) and the "support" people were not able to give me specifics.

My take-away is that the two are really very similar, and that as mentioned the one to the right (shorter H-T) will be slightly less twitchy.

Is anyone aware of a good, up-to-date, thorough book on this stuff?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-20-2020, 03:40 PM
Dave Dave is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 5,904
I use the STA, in addition to the reach and stack, only as a reference for seat post setback. The small frames that I ride usually have 74-74.5 STA and that works fine for me with a 25mm setback post.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-20-2020, 05:12 PM
dddd dddd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 2,207
Once we started getting sloping-toptube frames, this "Stack" dimension became the way to know if a new frame would need a pile of spacers underneath a cool-looking negative-rise stem.
Also better for the headset function if a ton of spacers aren't there.

All this somewhat reminds me of how one "improvement" begets new issues within the overall big picture.

So sloping toptubes remind me of carbon rims. We get lighter weight for any given width and aero depth, but then find ourselves "needing" disc brake frame structures to deal with the reduced braking performance, leading to the "need" for ever-wider tires to provide compliance, and now have to go tubeless to seal up all of the added thorn punctures that a thinner-walled and wider tire mops up. And on top of that, the new sub-2-pound frames seem to be extremely fragile in the context of minor tip-overs, but are again "needed" to counter the added weight of going disc.

In the end, it's nothing that money can't fix, though I dislike the prospect of any unexpected latex sealant shower from the lead rider's punctured tubeless tire.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-20-2020, 09:44 PM
robertbb robertbb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 955
Higher modulus carbon in general seems to be more prone to cracks and brakes with "tip-over".

Sure it's stiffer but also far more brittle.

One of the experts, Raoul Leuscher (see his vids on Youtube) has stated that T700 is pretty much the best blend of stiffness, weight and impact resistance.

T700 is also used on pretty much all the mid-level frames as far as I can tell. It's the "high end" that get into T800 and T1000 carbon.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.