Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

View Poll Results: Which geometry?
Top 11 40.74%
Bottom 16 59.26%
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 03-07-2024, 08:56 AM
snguyen268 snguyen268 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spoker View Post
I'm in the lower BB drop category.
Since you're running 165 mm cranks you can already go lower by 5 mm.
Design for the road tire, and when you go to rough terrain the bigger tire will raise it.
That makes sense! I will definitely consider that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by .RJ View Post
I dont see T47 going away and will future proof against just about any crankset that you'd ever want to use. If you want to run a rear brake cable internally you will need a T47 BB to get the clearance you need.

BSA may restrict your choices in the future. How? Who knows. I went T47 on a custom steel road frame, and I wish I'd done BSA - the internal routing has not proved really necessary and aesthetically the BSA would have looked better and I didnt consider that when making my choices.
I actually will not be running hydraulic hose through BB but around it externally. One thing I am safeguarding against is the ability to run di2 + 30mm crank, which seems to be too tight with BSA and makes me leaning toward T47. Of course, shimano might go completely wireless in the future and I am going to run SRAM for now, so that might be a moot point and I am just overthinking?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Wunder View Post
46/10 is a HUGE gear, are you sure you need that much? My gravel bike runs SRAM 11 speed with a 42T and 10-42, that yields 27-114 gear inches on 35mm tires (even higher if using 42 or 50mm). I've considered dropping the ring to a 38 or 36 if I was riding a very hilly course.

I personally like BSA, it's been around a long time and works well. Tons of crank options.
Thanks for the insights! I agree with you as I don't need that 46/10 combo. Reason I am thinking 46 is not really because of the 46/10 combo but because I am still going to be doing a lot of road riding and 46 gets me the closest to the 3 heavily used gear ratios on my current setup( which is 50/34 + 11-34). If I end up needing lower gears, it should be simple enough to get a smaller chainring and swap out (at least that is my current thinking). Not sure if that rationale makese sense? Or I should be thinking about it differently?
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.