Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old Yesterday, 03:25 PM
rice rocket's Avatar
rice rocket rice rocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,983
Real talk, can I get a Waltly in before Jan 20?
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old Yesterday, 03:50 PM
mhespenheide mhespenheide is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 6,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by rice rocket View Post
Real talk, can I get a Waltly in before Jan 20?
{like}
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old Yesterday, 04:05 PM
fried bake fried bake is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 620
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdak View Post
You mean like they have already been experiencing the last couple of years, right?
existing tariffs account for around $200-$300 per household. Current inflation rate is 2.4%.

https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/tariffs/
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old Yesterday, 04:13 PM
jamesdak jamesdak is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 5,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by makoti View Post
So let's make it worse, right?
Nope, not at all my thoughts. But we are pinging over something that has not even happened while seeming to ignore what already has.
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old Yesterday, 04:13 PM
jamesdak jamesdak is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 5,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by rice rocket View Post
Real talk, can I get a Waltly in before Jan 20?
Do it, this is the perfect excuse!
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old Yesterday, 05:27 PM
makoti makoti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NoVa
Posts: 6,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdak View Post
Nope, not at all my thoughts. But we are pinging over something that has not even happened while seeming to ignore what already has.
"What already has" has been a worldwide situation caused by worldwide decreased then increased demand. We actually came through it better than most. Tariffs are not a worldwide issue. This is Us doing things that have been shown to increase prices. Looking ahead is always a good idea.
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old Yesterday, 05:57 PM
jamesdak jamesdak is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 5,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by fried bake View Post
existing tariffs account for around $200-$300 per household. Current inflation rate is 2.4%.

https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/tariffs/
This was actually a good read when you go through the whole piece.

Makes me glad that I have always taken the steps I can control to isolate myself from the decisions of any administration.

Bike and bike parts are so insignificant compared to the essentials.
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old Yesterday, 06:00 PM
jamesdak jamesdak is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 5,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by makoti View Post
"What already has" has been a worldwide situation caused by worldwide decreased then increased demand. We actually came through it better than most. Tariffs are not a worldwide issue. This is Us doing things that have been shown to increase prices. Looking ahead is always a good idea.
Yep, but I can't say what I really mean without pushing this over the edge. Gotta continue skirting around things like everyone else has been doing.
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old Yesterday, 10:47 PM
robertbb robertbb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by openwheelracing View Post
Exactly the nine dash lines. I already touched on this earlier. Look it up it is very complicated where you get your news digest heavily determines one’s view on all the territorial disputes between Japan, Taiwan, PI and China.I am very aware of all the military activities around China. All smoke, no action and there will never be any action because China is simply not an aggressor. Not historically nor today. Instead of focusing on potential disputes with China, why not worry about competing with China?

Again, hate China if you like if that’s your World view. Tariffs hurts everyone at the end of day.
So there's a valid reason China draws its nine dash line into the territorial waters of a bunch of other countries, is there?

China not an aggressor?

https://2017-2021.state.gov/chinas-m...acific-region/

And that's just the Indo Pacific. Then there's Tibet, Taiwan, Indian border, there's the belt-and-road initiative.....

I just can't take you seriously anymore.

Surely this is high quality, Durianrider-esque trolling. Surely.
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old Yesterday, 10:54 PM
sheepdog84 sheepdog84 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 263
this aggression will not stand, man
__________________
pedalroom
Reply With Quote
  #131  
Old Today, 10:10 AM
tommyrod74 tommyrod74 is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 716
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdak View Post
Nope, not at all my thoughts. But we are pinging over something that has not even happened while seeming to ignore what already has.
I don't think anyone's ignoring the past few years of (relatively) high inflation. I think some are questioning the wisdom of promising policy changes that have been proven historically to raise prices for consumers.

One has happened already and cant be changed (though it has been largely contained). One is promised and looming. One was, at least to a great extent, thrust upon us (the pandemic). The other will be a conscious choice, and an unforced error if it comes to pass.

If you're someone who won't focus more on what is to come than what has already been, I'm not sure how to convince you otherwise.
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old Today, 10:23 AM
OtayBW OtayBW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NoBaltoCo
Posts: 6,303
All very interesting, but thank goodness the price of eggs is coming down....
__________________
“A bicycle is not a sofa”
-- Dario Pegoretti
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old Today, 10:57 AM
openwheelracing openwheelracing is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 395
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertbb View Post
So there's a valid reason China draws its nine dash line into the territorial waters of a bunch of other countries, is there?

China not an aggressor?

https://2017-2021.state.gov/chinas-m...acific-region/

And that's just the Indo Pacific. Then there's Tibet, Taiwan, Indian border, there's the belt-and-road initiative.....

I just can't take you seriously anymore.

Surely this is high quality, Durianrider-esque trolling. Surely.
When you say the BRI, I think it is great for World economy but you expect me to think otherwise. When you bring up XiangJiang, I am still waiting on concrete evidence. When you say Taiwan, I think about conservative KMT vs the progressive anti-China green party. When you say "Indian border", I think about the disputed line drew by the UK. Very different World views. That is all. You do you my friend. There is no reason getting pissed over politics.
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old Today, 11:02 AM
Fat Cat Fat Cat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by openwheelracing View Post
Better than yours
With each post you confirm that beyond doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old Today, 11:13 AM
mlc mlc is offline
Moots Vamoots
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Bishkek, KG
Posts: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by openwheelracing View Post
When you say the BRI, I think it is great for World economy but you expect me to think otherwise. When you bring up XiangJiang, I am still waiting on concrete evidence. When you say Taiwan, I think about conservative KMT vs the progressive anti-China green party. When you say "Indian border", I think about the disputed line drew by the UK. Very different World views. That is all. You do you my friend. There is no reason getting pissed over politics.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...eafood-you-eat

You can add this article to the list of issues with Chinese refusal to recognize international law. The pro-China shillery is a strange thing to be doubling down on, because it's just so clear that China is a bad actor on the international stage... yet again, that doesn't absolve other nations of their bad actions, and that doesn't mean there aren't great things about China, but it's just so obvious that China does some horrible things in Xinjiang, Tibet, and at sea.

I highly recommend this article as yet another example of that fact. Some of the best reporting I've ever read, fascinating and heartbreaking look into the environmental and human costs of China's illegal distant-water fishing fleet. I think it can definitely be hard to parse the propaganda coming from pretty much any political direction, but it's hard to argue with writing like this that is so deeply rooted in well-reported stories and facts. Very long but very worth the time and energy
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.