Quote:
Originally Posted by colker
I am not a fan of the anodizing they use. It does not match any other silver or black from other makers. And they look utilitarian. Compare it to a campagnolo titanium seatpost and it´s obvious aesthethics are not Thomson´s strength. Otoh that campagnolo seatpost and it´s serrated stops may not place your saddle where it needs to be while Thomson´s microadjust double bolt is a no brainer.
|
REALLY?!?! I love their anodizing. It's really good and consistent. They use a guy in Pennsylvania. He does a great job IMO. They replace the dye all the time so they never have the greenie or fading of some other brands. I find their black ano matches lots of stuff. I think what you are seeing is the fine machining lines on the stem and post as to why they don't match.
So, the funny story about the fine machining lines.... Ronnie's daughter was on the Mercer University cycling team and they were unhappy with the stem and post they were using. Not adjustable enough on the post and the stem was flexy. So he machined up some stems and posts for the girls.
The original ones had the fine machining lines and no one said anything about them. They were prototypes so he figured no biggie giving them to the girls to ride and he would make real ones. So he made a bunch of real ones with the fine matching lines for awhile. Then the "real" ones he made, the next few batches, they had a smooth finish. And they continued making the smooth ones for awhile.
What happened was people complained that they were smooth. That they liked the fine machine lines. That they wanted the parts with the lines. And it was an overwhelming response against the smooth, that people wanted the lines. So from then on, Thomson made the stems and posts with the fine machine lines. They don't weaken the stems at all. It all cosmetic. But people wanted them so Ronnie made them like that. Since Thomson was used primarily by mountain bikers in the 90's, that segment loved the looks and finish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cfrancato
I just feel like all the Thomson stuff was made to be visually pleasing on chunkier mountain bikes instead of sleek road bikes
|
See the note above about the fine machine lines.
Quote:
Originally Posted by charliedid
I thought it was made to foment anger and divisiveness.
|
LOL!
Quote:
Originally Posted by truth
|
I like the looks of the X2. The X4 isn't bad for a mountain stem.
Quote:
Originally Posted by joosttx
Funny, I switched a Thomson stem for a Paul’s boxcar. The Thomson stem would not stay in place under their torque specs. Never had an issue with the boxcar. Also, the quality of the Paul’s boxcar stem is superior, as well as its hardware. The bolts that Thomson spec suck compared to most good brands.
|
Not sure what the problem was. I've never had an issue with a stem staying tight. As for the bolts, Never had an issue there either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashUNC
Paul and team at least have enough aesthetic sense to know ano'ing those things crazy colors is the only way out.
|
I pestered them for a while to do other colors. Mike and David liked it but Brian was against it. They've only now started with the hardcoat stems and posts. The did do a one off run of red anodized Red Hook stems and posts. They also did some cool one off ones for Team USA and a couple other riders.
A guy in Idaho was selling anodized Thomson stems and posts in a bunch of different colors. It got to be a problem for HQ cause people would have something break and they'd want a replacement just like it. Since we didn't make it, people were pissed. That's why I pushed for them to start doing more ano colors.