Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 12-01-2020, 11:08 AM
charlieclick charlieclick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: London
Posts: 140
Actually, “Rene Herse Stigmata” is quite a catchy name for their next tubeless line.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 12-01-2020, 11:27 AM
charliedid's Avatar
charliedid charliedid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlieclick View Post
Actually, “Rene Herse Stigmata” is quite a catchy name for their next tubeless line.
Or the Grim Weeper.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 12-01-2020, 11:28 AM
wyatt_ wyatt_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Iowa City
Posts: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by benb View Post
I have yet to ride any of their tires but have been around lots of people who have had them and I've seen lots of issues. I have stuck with the regular panaracers. They're bulletproof, perform great, and save a bunch of money.

By the time you put so much sealant in the RH tire it you probably erase a lot of the difference between the RH version and the Panaracer version, or the difference between a tubeless and tubed setup.

The whole thing with tubeless and low pressures is you don't have to resort to such fragile tires to get a good ride. Lots of MTB tires are stiff and rigid but it doesn't matter at all cause you can run them at 15-20psi without issue and they can be as supple as you want when they have so little pressure.

JH is right about tire pressures IMO but you don't have to buy his whole story.

I run Gravel King 32s right now with tubes and I have no issues with running ~60-65psi in the back and 40-45psi in the front and bashing them off all kinds of rocks and roots. I'm about 170 and I have yet to get a flat doing this, and I don't even bother with tubeless. That's with tubes.

My MTB rims are ancient and they're not sealing up tubeless well anymore so I've run tubes this year. No problem running 25psi back and 20psi front with tubes this year on 26x2.3".

I don't have goat head thorns to deal with though..
Mostly cosign with Ben here. I run tubeless on my MTB, the benefits seem obvious, especially if you're running very low PSI and want to avoid pinch flats. So, worth the trouble, imo. But if you're not riding in a thorny, flat-prone area, I just don't get the appeal of road tubeless. I'm speaking 700x38 and below here. I can see the benefit once you reach road plus 650x47 sizes.

Outside of thorns, can anyone really explain the benefits of going through this trouble for a 700x35 tire that would mount up with a lightweight tube in few minutes?
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 12-01-2020, 11:40 AM
benb benb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Eastern MA
Posts: 10,518
The weird thing here is we do have plenty of thorns on vines that ought to be able to pierce a tire just fine.

And yet I don't really think I've ever managed to ride over a vine just right to do so.

Certainly they grow across trails, I snagged my clothes on some just last week. But they often just don't seem to be in the right place for you to actually ride over it and puncture the tire, perhaps just cause trail work + riders/hikers/horses passing by keep them off the trail.

It really seems to require local plants that actually shed the thorns onto the ground, ours don't do that.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 12-01-2020, 11:49 AM
d_douglas d_douglas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 10,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by joosttx View Post
Looks like the gravel version of Carrie.
Now that is funny!
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 12-01-2020, 11:50 AM
Jaybee Jaybee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: 303
Posts: 4,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by benb View Post
The weird thing here is we do have plenty of thorns on vines that ought to be able to pierce a tire just fine.

And yet I don't really think I've ever managed to ride over a vine just right to do so.

Certainly they grow across trails, I snagged my clothes on some just last week. But they often just don't seem to be in the right place for you to actually ride over it and puncture the tire, perhaps just cause trail work + riders/hikers/horses passing by keep them off the trail.

It really seems to require local plants that actually shed the thorns onto the ground, ours don't do that.

Certainly it's location dependent. Anyone who has lived in the Southwest US for a time knows what a goathead is. I grew up in southern NM; pre-tubeless you could get so many goatheads imbedded in your tire that it made more sense to scrap the tire than try to pick every little thorn out.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 12-01-2020, 12:07 PM
lavi's Avatar
lavi lavi is offline
Deconditioned!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: pdx
Posts: 3,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyatt_ View Post
Mostly cosign with Ben here. I run tubeless on my MTB, the benefits seem obvious, especially if you're running very low PSI and want to avoid pinch flats. So, worth the trouble, imo. But if you're not riding in a thorny, flat-prone area, I just don't get the appeal of road tubeless. I'm speaking 700x38 and below here. I can see the benefit once you reach road plus 650x47 sizes.

Outside of thorns, can anyone really explain the benefits of going through this trouble for a 700x35 tire that would mount up with a lightweight tube in few minutes?
This! No offense to anyone, but I just don't get tubeless. At all. Ever since they came on the scene, the issues with them are well known. I could maybe see using them if I had issues with goat heads, but I don't. Aside from that, why? I can see pro mtb using them...but if you're wrenching for yourself?

I know. It's all about low pressure which equals grip. Is that the deal? I find that I dislike having a low pressure tire squirm around. That feeling makes me nervous on trail. For me, riding with tubes (mtb and road) is a low hassle thing. Maybe I ride "light" in that I don't bash into things and get pinch flats. However, I wouldn't say that I'm exactly taking it easy when riding mtb. I hardly ever (knock on Spruce) pinch flat. Hell, cannot remember the last time I flatted like that.

Having to deal with mounting woes, refreshing, having an issue trail/roadside...

For me, tubeless seems like solving a problem that doesn't exist. But y'all go for it. I enjoy scratching my heads at these threads.

And, atmo, RH tires kick serious ass.


SOOOO I guess my question for all tubless posters here is: do you ride in an area with Goat Heads (thus why you run tubeless)? If not, why bother with it? Not trying to be snarky. Trying to understand the reason for use.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 12-01-2020, 12:29 PM
ColonelJLloyd ColonelJLloyd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Louisville
Posts: 6,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyatt_ View Post
Outside of thorns, can anyone really explain the benefits of going through this trouble for a 700x35 tire that would mount up with a lightweight tube in few minutes?
I don't have trouble. In the aggregate I'm certain I spend much less time mounting tires and adding sealant than I would changing and patching tubes over the life of a tire. I'm not discounting the experiences of others, but mine are what they are.

Inner tubes often weigh 1/3 as much as the tire or more. A Schwalbe SV17 weighs ~150g whereas a Bon Jon EL weighs ~305g. Sealant has weight itself, but it's not as much and behaves differently.

I haven't had a flat* since I went tubeless on 32mm and larger tires four years ago. Coagulated sealant at apparent punctures in the tread visible when tires are removed indicate I would've had flats had I been using tubes.

Tubeless isn't for everyone and that's fine. But, it sure seems that a disproportionate amount of the hand-wringing comes from people who don't actually use tubeless setups in the configurations they are going on about.

In my experience, I have to add air to my tires much less with my tubeless setups than I ever had to with tubes.

I doubt I would abandon inner tubes if I still used tires narrower than 32mm. Higher pressures really seem to decrease the advantages and increase the problems according to posts on this forum and others.

*I once had to stop to add some air to a non-tubeless Pacenti Pari-Moto that lost pressure before the sealant did its job.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 12-01-2020, 12:46 PM
Jaybee Jaybee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: 303
Posts: 4,402
I have similar experiences to the Colonel above. Less time futzing with tires overall, one (1) road or trailside repair incident in the last 5 years which was primarily my fault for stuffing a light tire in the middle of a bunch of square edged rocks. I frequently smash my MTB into stuff that I'm sure is going to cut a tire and would be a pinch flat every time if I had tubes and it just keeps rolling. Refresh sealant every few months or so, maybe pull the tire off once a year to pull out the old sealant, maybe not. Usually the tire is pretty done by that point anyway.

But experiences like people are describing with the RH tires above would put me off it for sure. When you've got tubeless, extremely thin supple sidewalls are actually detrimental. You'll end up with more pressure than necessary to avoid the tire folding in corners and the overall ride is worse.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 12-01-2020, 12:59 PM
dbnm dbnm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 3,191
RH Bon Jon Pass Endurance - 700x35 - 355g - $85

Gravel King Slick Plus - 700x35 - 350g - $60

One is bulletproof and is $25 less than the one with issues.

Just saying.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 12-01-2020, 01:15 PM
Hilltopperny's Avatar
Hilltopperny Hilltopperny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Lassellsville NY
Posts: 10,416
I definitely prefer tubeless and have not had many issues as it relates to tubeless set ups. The Herse tires are the best riding tires for me and my use out where I live. I find that tubeless set ups ride smoother and I do not even run very low tire pressures as I am heavy and tend to prefer how they ride near their max pressures.

I do not typically get a lot of flats where I live as the roads tend to not have much in the way of sharp debris and such. It is the ride quality of tubeless that I prefer. There are quirks to them and I get it, but I have not used an inner tube since selling my Columbine. I have a stash of close to 30 butyl tubes here that will likely sit unused as well as some nice 23mm tires. Just not in the cards for me any time soon.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 12-01-2020, 01:28 PM
Jan Heine Jan Heine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 142
First of all, we're always sorry when customers have issues with the products we sell. We work hard, and so do our suppliers, to minimize these as much as possible.

Tubeless is an emerging technology, with no standards yet. We're working with the ASTM and ISO to establish standards that hopefully will ensure compatibility in the future. As others have noted, the same tires work great on some rims, and are a terribly loose fit on others. That indicates it's not the tires, but the rims, that are the issue. This affects not just our tires –*somebody posted a link to Simworks, and I know Schwalbe has similar concerns.

There simply is a huge variability in rims these days. At one end, high-end carbon rims like Enve and Zipp are tight-fitting, and if we make our tires any smaller, they won't go on at all.

At the other end, many OEM rims that come on production bikes are undersized. Some of that is intentional –*it makes mounting tires much easier at the big factories that assemble the bikes – and some of it is just due to tolerances. The high-end rims have tight tolerances – they are all pretty much the same –*but the OEM rims are made to much looser standards. And since a rim that's too big is a no-go – the tire won't go on – most rim makers err on the side of making them smaller, when in doubt. (Imagine if you've got 5000 wheelsets at the factory for assembly into bikes, and you find out that the tires don't go on!)

Generally, the more supple a tire, the more demanding it is to mount, especially tubeless. So if you've got any doubts about your rims, we recommend the Endurance or Endurance Plus versions... The Endurance rolls as fast as our Standard casing – which means as fast or faster than any other tire in the industry – so it's a great choice for all-round riding. This doesn't mean that you can't run an Extralight tubeless, but it requires a rim that is just the right size and a little more care in setup.

Thank you to all who've chimed in. We're working hard to bring some standards into this crazy situation.

Jan Heine
Rene Herse Cycles
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 12-01-2020, 01:29 PM
XXtwindad XXtwindad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 8,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbnm View Post
rh bon jon pass endurance - 700x35 - 355g - $85

gravel king slick plus - 700x35 - 350g - $60

one is bulletproof and is $25 less than the one with issues.

just saying.
+1,000.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 12-01-2020, 01:32 PM
dbnm dbnm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 3,191
oh boy.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 12-01-2020, 01:32 PM
benb benb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Eastern MA
Posts: 10,518
I went tubeless on my MTB in 2006 IIRC and I've still got those same rims and had to go back to tubes this year due to corrosion around the valve stems. Not sure what I'm going to do when I replace my MTB. The bike is very long in the tooth and I've already told my wife for several years if a big repair is needed expect to see me buy a new MTB.

My guess is tubeless actually consumed more time than if I'd stuck with tubes teh whole time due to the extra mount/unmount time + sealant time + refreshing sealant.

I would never say I had that much trouble with it but it's definitely more time consuming, and my # of flats on tubes is very very low as well. I've always rode way more on the road + gravel and flats are just rare.

And I can definitely change a flat with a tubed tire faster than I can refresh sealant in the tubeless setup. I am really lazy about refreshing the sealant but I still do it like 2x a year at least, I probably average less than 1 flat per year on the tubed tire setups and there's no way the total time wasted on the tubed setup is more than the tubeless.

When I went tubeless on my MTB I thought it was great.. now that I'm back with tubes I'm not sure it was that important.. 14 years of riding I've learned a lot about that bike, picking out the right tires, getting pressures right, getting shock/fork setup right, bike fit, picking lines, etc.. and when I went back to tubed tires this year it was kind of no big deal.. I didn't notice much of a drop in performance or a need to increase pressures.

The whole thing gives me zero motivation to try it on a road bike or gravel bike really.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
snake oil, too good to be true


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.