Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #511  
Old 09-10-2024, 10:39 PM
chismog chismog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 1,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowpoke View Post
Can someone check my math here?

According to Geometry Geeks, the Look 585 in a medium supposedly has a reach of 386mm: https://geometrygeeks.bike/bike/look-585-2008/

Checking the geo chart, and calculating it, I get a different reach.

585 geocharts:
https://ep1.pinkbike.org/p4pb14497764/p4pb14497764.jpg

This should just be virtual top-tube - setback from BB (B - E), right?

Calculating my own E here:
Code:
sin (90º*- STA) * A1 - we want A1 because it meets with B in the diagram
= sin (90º - 73.73º) * 530
= 0.27982901 * 530
= 148.3mm - this matches up with the E in the chart
The virtual top-tube B is 545mm.

545 - 148.3 = 396mm for reach.

This seem right? Thanks!
I didn't check your math, but I did check your variables. In the chart, there are three lengths shown for seat tube. There's a mistake in the chart!

A1 cannot be longer than A as shown in the drawing. But it is in the chart. Comparing this against my own 585, I see that in reality:

A1= Actual, center to top
A2= Actual, center to center
A= Virtual (traditional size), center to center.

So my my large is 53.5 to top, and it fits about like a 55-56.

Reply With Quote
  #512  
Old 09-10-2024, 11:35 PM
slowpoke slowpoke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,704
Quote:
Originally Posted by chismog View Post
I didn't check your math, but I did check your variables. In the chart, there are three lengths shown for seat tube. There's a mistake in the chart!

A1 cannot be longer than A as shown in the drawing. But it is in the chart. Comparing this against my own 585, I see that in reality:

A1= Actual, center to top
A2= Actual, center to center
A= Virtual (traditional size), center to center.

So my my large is 53.5 to top, and it fits about like a 55-56.

Thanks Chris! Oh gosh, why didn't I even think of that! Blindly looking at the numbers without seeing if they even make sense....

Also, I realized that stack and reach are calculated at the top of the headtube, but B is based on the top tube/headtube junction. so we need to factor in K + K0 to get that.

The stack in my diagram is wrong because I'm relying on the incorrect seattube, but the reach should be.

I'll update things again in the morning with your new findings. Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: png look585-stack-reach.png (109.3 KB, 115 views)
Reply With Quote
  #513  
Old 09-11-2024, 08:55 AM
thwart's Avatar
thwart thwart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wisco
Posts: 11,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by chismog View Post
So my my large is 53.5 to top, and it fits about like a 55-56.

I’d agree. My large fits like a 56.

With a 20 mm setback post, the saddle in a slightly back position on the post and a 100 mm stem, my saddle tip to bar measurement is approximately 54 cm, FWIW.

Here’s a pic shortly after I built it up and before final bar tape application. Saddle height is 75.5 cm.

__________________
Old... and in the way.

Last edited by thwart; 09-11-2024 at 08:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.