#31
|
|||
|
|||
I asked a similar question about a month ago. I'd been wearing Genius 9 for the last 8 or 9 years and my forefoot width had changed over that time. Many people said the Genius 10 were slightly wider. I went to Genius 10 in a half size larger and they fit great. Also, like you I have a high arches and narrow heels.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
I have the same feet.
I have high instep, tall arches and double ee width. Lake and sidi mega with the heal cup adjustment. I give the nod to lake for comfort. But. I think the side's are more durable over the years.
the 242's from like have a really large upper. I have two pair and love them |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
it's really too bad so many of us have this issue. my feet are disproportionally wide at the 1st metatarsal joint and i haven't found any shoes that don't make my toes numb. typical wide shoes are too wide for me in the midfoot and then still have the problem of tapering near the toe.
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
yep s-works
decades of running have spread my forefoot relative to my high arch and narrow heels. tried many, s-works worked best
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
lots of costly experiments though. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
All the money spent of experiments likely exceeds the cost of Lamson shoes, that last for many years!
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|