Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 09-10-2024, 08:13 AM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by flying View Post
S-pensive
S-uperior

__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 09-10-2024, 08:25 AM
mcteague's Avatar
mcteague mcteague is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 3,244
First video I've seen. Still think the naming convention makes little sense. They should just stick with Record like they did with the mech group.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AIgw-iH3Xw

Tim

Last edited by mcteague; 09-10-2024 at 12:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-10-2024, 08:35 AM
merckxman merckxman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: western NJ
Posts: 1,514
Matt shading is in.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screenshot_20240910_083336_Chrome.jpg (44.5 KB, 359 views)
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-10-2024, 08:41 AM
CNY rider CNY rider is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hartwick NY
Posts: 5,257
Looks aside I like the available crankset options.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 09-10-2024, 08:47 AM
Ryun Ryun is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earlysville VA
Posts: 2,996
So first blush looks like the pro team setup would be the super record wrl with the 54/40 chainrings on the using the S front derailleur which also gets the stiffer all alloy cage.

Sounds like the S crankset isn't hollow or ti and 150 grams extra isn't nothing.
Not too many places on an electronic setup to really trim costs besides the cranks and maybe some of the materials in the derailleurs.

really curious if the current rear derailleur will work with the 32t cassette.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 09-10-2024, 10:23 AM
Mark McM Mark McM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McM View Post
Just to throw a thought out - one of the features of the Super Record Wireless group is the reduced sized chainrings and sprockets (cassettes all start with 10t, largest chainring 50t). I don't think the this has been well received, particularly that the largest cassette is a 10-29. Maybe the "S" version uses more traditional sized cassettes and chainrings? This might also allow "semi-mullet" setups for those who want lower gears, with a big cassette in the back and a sub-compact in front. Or maybe I'm just daydreaming.
Nailed it!
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 09-10-2024, 10:58 AM
sailorboy sailorboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dresher PA
Posts: 3,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derosid View Post
“Sandblasted”?
Haha, you win!
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 09-10-2024, 11:44 AM
dana_e dana_e is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,800
All that black fiber stuff

looks like Mirage 10 speed, I would rather have Chorus 12 and not electric.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 09-10-2024, 11:59 AM
flying flying is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldpotatoe View Post
S-uperior

As a 4 decade Campy user I do agree
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 09-10-2024, 12:17 PM
mcteague's Avatar
mcteague mcteague is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 3,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldpotatoe View Post
S-uperior

Superior to what? For the record, no pun intended, I’ve used Campy for years but went to SRAM with a new bike two years ago. Just as with their first index shifting groups they seemed to have missed the mark IMO. This S group is just SR WRL with some cheaper materials and a different finish. I think they should have named it Chorus and lowered the price even more.

Tim
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 09-10-2024, 01:54 PM
tv_vt tv_vt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East Coast of Vermont
Posts: 5,939
Assume this is only available for disc brakes, yes? No rim brake option?
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 09-10-2024, 02:17 PM
Mark McM Mark McM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by tv_vt View Post
Assume this is only available for disc brakes, yes? No rim brake option?
Yes. Which I guess makes the brakes wireless as well (hydraulic fluid instead of a wire cable).
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 09-10-2024, 04:01 PM
Old School's Avatar
Old School Old School is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: West Coast
Posts: 862
I like the font.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 09-10-2024, 07:09 PM
charliedid's Avatar
charliedid charliedid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13,497
Looks nice to me design wise.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 09-10-2024, 07:20 PM
cgolvin's Avatar
cgolvin cgolvin is offline
#RYFB
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: The Boss Basin
Posts: 5,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McM View Post
Maybe the "S" version uses more traditional sized cassettes and chainrings? This might also allow "semi-mullet" setups for those who want lower gears, with a big cassette in the back and a sub-compact in front. Or maybe I'm just daydreaming.
As we've now seen, the lowest gear that is blessed for this groupset would be with the 45/29 rings and 11-32 cassette.

I daydreamed about a semi-mullet setup using the 45/29 crankset and mechanical 12 speed, since those groupsets' RDs support up to 34. Campy says "not compatible" but Ryun was kind enough to assemble such a setup and said it worked well.
__________________
Gios Peg Bixxis
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.