OT: Watch Talk

[ntb1001]

Submariner watches are still in demand and hard to get at retail from an AD. I would consider a slightly less popular model such as Explorer 2, or Seadweller and try with an AD to get new one at retail.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[IJWS]

I tried on an Explorer II last week and really liked it. I think it might have a little more "street-cred" than a sub but that's a YMMV statement. I have been looking for a GMT since I was stuck in another time zone while dealing with family issues this past summer.

[hellvetica]

You guys rule. That’s all. Thanks for all the support!

[krooj]

Originally Posted by IJWS

I tried on an Explorer II last week and really liked it. I think it might have a little more "street-cred" than a sub but that's a YMMV statement. I have been looking for a GMT since I was stuck in another time zone while dealing with family issues this past summer.

If you're open to a watch that straddles sporty and dress, take a look into the JLC Master Geographic. Iterations of that movement have been used for around 30 years in various watches from JLC, AP, and VC - it's a very well regarded movement. The newest iteration is gorgeous (https://www.jaeger-lecoultre.com/us-...steel-q4128420) and can be had under MSRP.

If you want an Explorer II that wears smaller, take a look at later variants of the 16570; they include a newer 3186 movement and have a no-hole case.

Back to the dive watch - take a look at a Glashutte Original SeaQ Pano Date: https://www.glashuette-original.com/...6-13-02-81-70/.

[gt88]

I know everyone is trying to be helpful, but if the OP wants a sub they should get a sub. I’ve chased “almost a…” enough times to know they don’t really scratch the itch. Yes, subs are crazy expensive and not the most watch for the money, but the heart wants what the heart wants. And if you change your mind the resale value vs a JLC or GO is not comparable at all.

That said, I would take a GO if I was in the market