#151
|
|||
|
|||
The correct answer was "yes"
__________________
This foot tastes terrible! |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Oh you can't replicate it, oh well. Better replace it to be safe! It doesn't cost them any money, and the warranty/recall paperwork only indicates that there's some concern, complaint or legitimate issue, that they MAY be able to replicate. If you tick ANY of those boxes, you'll get a new crankset. Last edited by mjf; 09-22-2023 at 11:51 PM. |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
(yes, I'm still teasing!) On serious notes again: Except for the apartment part, sounds good. I don't particularly like that many people around. BTDT didn't like it. M |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#155
|
||||
|
||||
I’m sort of confused based on what I’ve read: is the replacement crankset a new non series item? You get the same replacement if you had DA or Ultegra? Do you get new CRs too or use the old ones? Anyone have a photo of a replacement unit?
__________________
http://less-than-epic.blogspot.com/ |
#156
|
||||
|
||||
Here you go:
__________________
"Progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." - Robert Heinlein |
#157
|
||||
|
||||
The replacement cranks will have specially made 11s chainrings that fit onto 12s cranks..and shimano 'promises' that these made for the recall cranksets will continue to be made...promise.
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels Qui Si Parla Campagnolo |
#158
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels Qui Si Parla Campagnolo Last edited by oldpotatoe; 09-23-2023 at 09:35 AM. |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
For better or worse my 8000 series cranks have a date code that looks to be just a bit more recent than covered by the recall.
Does anyone know if that means they have the more recent design (more/different glue, a different internal design to prevent water egress?) or if Shimano just hasn't decided to recall them yet? In any case, I'm not super worried. It sounds like for the majority of cases there are a variety of warning signs. |
#160
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#161
|
|||
|
|||
I think they'll just go into a giant recycling bin. Doubt they'll put it on a bike and ride it to find out. Never had any feedback from shimano unless someone forgot use the prepaid label they always pay for to put a warranty part in a box and leave it so the fed ex can take it back to them. Their prepaid label is the best in the biz by far
An aside, all the broken cranks I've seen have been on the rides of folks I would consider (1)toxic sweaters (2)combined with a chronic need to always destroy equipment before seeking technical or mechanical help. Hard legs, soft mind syndrome At this point, I could tell you who will break them just by the condition of their bike |
#162
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
There's a reason that recalls exist, because within a broad classification of products produced, in this case, 0.59% are likely to have a defect, and it's more cost effective and less time consuming to replace all of them outright rather than trying to fight each individual person's claim that their product is damaged or not. |
#163
|
|||
|
|||
Chorus 11s cranks are the answer I expected from the old spud.
|
#164
|
|||
|
|||
I would be bummed to let go of the 9000 crank. Most beautiful shimano crankset in a long while
|
#165
|
|||
|
|||
make sure you dry out the moisture inside before you put the nds preload cap back on if your cranks are still good.
from what i read aluminum oxide is porous and aluminum reacts with water so any moisture trapped inside the crankset will eat through the bonds until they fail. |
|
|