Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Yesterday, 05:12 PM
sokyroadie sokyroadie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin, KY
Posts: 2,965
New bike question

I am getting close in the queue for a Ti Medium reach frame - I have a new Whisky Med reach fork and was planning on either TRP RG957 or Velo Orange Medium reach calipers (black). I have the TRP brakes on another Medium reach Seven and they are fine. Should I consider the Paul Medium reach Racers or go with the VO brakes (easier to find). I was originally going to use the Black TRP brakes from the Seven, but decided to keep the Seven also.

The Paul's would need to be the center mount - decisions decisions

TIA

No way do I want or need a disc road bike
__________________
Sonder MTB, Seven Ti, Lynskey Ti Gravel
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Yesterday, 06:40 PM
Peter P. Peter P. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Meriden CT
Posts: 7,393
Get the sidepulls. No need to install cable hangers, as with centerpull brakes and plenty of stopping power.

I'd sooner buy a set of old Universal centerpull brakes, or Weinman. Paul's are just plain ugly to me.

Also, I don't know whether the Paul's have a pull ratio that requires a specific brake lever, but you have several choices with dual pivot levers. I prefer the hood shape of Cane Creek levers.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Yesterday, 11:06 PM
lafish lafish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 81
Personally, I think the Pauls look cool, but I have the Velo Orange Gran Cru on one of my bike and I like them quite a lot. Good stopping power, good modulation, plenty of clearance. And no muss no fuss to install.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Yesterday, 11:35 PM
mhespenheide mhespenheide is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 6,328
Just an opinion, but the Racer Medium don't really gain you anything over modern medium-reach sidepulls while they add the complexity of needing to add another cable stop. And that gets you faffing about with extra bits on the headset if you want them on your very nice Whisky fork.

Now, if you want to go all-in and mount Racers directly to your frame? Commission a custom steel fork and do the same up front? Go for it. But if you're matching the tire clearance of the Whisky, I'd personally go with the RG957 or the older Shimano BR-600 if you want silver and can hunt them down. Again, my opinion, but the RG957 are 95-97% as good as any modern sidepull.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Yesterday, 11:38 PM
mhespenheide mhespenheide is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 6,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter P. View Post
I'd sooner buy a set of old Universal centerpull brakes, or Weinman. Paul's are just plain ugly to me.
Dia-Compe have some beautiful models, or Mafac if you want to re-polish them and score vintage points. Or Paul Racers in polished silver if you want modern -- the "full" Racers are much prettier than the more squarish Racer M's.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Today, 01:05 AM
Louis Louis is offline
Boeuf Chaîne
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 25,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by sokyroadie View Post
No way do I want or need a disc road bike
Don't deny it - these days anyone who's thinking about rim brakes always wonders "how wide can I go with the tires?" and from there it's short jump to discs. (shudder)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Today, 01:59 AM
hokoman hokoman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lisbon PT & Brooklyn NY
Posts: 2,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis View Post
Don't deny it - these days anyone who's thinking about rim brakes always wonders "how wide can I go with the tires?" and from there it's short jump to discs. (shudder)
Mid reach clears 38 tires comfortably, why would a road bike need anything wider?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Today, 02:23 AM
Louis Louis is offline
Boeuf Chaîne
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 25,842
I was kidding.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Today, 04:19 AM
hokoman hokoman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lisbon PT & Brooklyn NY
Posts: 2,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis View Post
I was kidding.
I missed the winking emoji! Too early in the morning for me here!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Today, 09:22 AM
ColonelJLloyd ColonelJLloyd is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Louisville
Posts: 6,172
Just go with VO.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old Today, 09:40 AM
benb benb is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Eastern MA
Posts: 10,667
Quote:
Originally Posted by sokyroadie View Post
I am getting close in the queue for a Ti Medium reach frame - I have a new Whisky Med reach fork and was planning on either TRP RG957 or Velo Orange Medium reach calipers (black). I have the TRP brakes on another Medium reach Seven and they are fine.

"They are fine" is the key point to me.

On a bike like you're buying (super nice custom Ti) the bikes should be ****ing awesome, not fine.

If the Paul's are that good they are probably worth it.

I like disc brakes, but I've been curmudgeonly about it more cause I don't want to have to replace whole bikes to get them, especially if it's replacing a perfectly good bike that didn't necessarily need to be replaced.

I don't view rim brakes at all as a problem for bikes with 30c tires or less with alloy wheels. They are generally pretty great. But it's these mid reach situations or carbon wheels where things start to get weird and you gotta ask if you're riding a zillion dollar bike why are the breaks not ****ing awesome like everything else on the bike. (Also why I didn't get disc 8 years ago when I bought my rim brake Domane, I was expecting the discs to be ****ing awesome like they were on MTB and the ones I test rode were definitely more "fine".

I have had one bike for a long time that has big tires & rim brakes and it's just been a compromise the entire time, it's the big "meh" part of the bike, but at least it's not an expensive bike.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Today, 11:27 AM
mhespenheide mhespenheide is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 6,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by benb View Post
"They are fine" is the key point to me.

.../snip/...

I have had one bike for a long time that has big tires & rim brakes and it's just been a compromise the entire time, it's the big "meh" part of the bike, but at least it's not an expensive bike.
@benb, can I ask you for more details as to what you're riding?

I'm curious, because I feel like I've had kind of the opposite experience. I've got a bike with Avid Ultimate canti's and 38mm tires and those brakes are powerful enough that I should probably put a brake booster on the front fork; hard braking can cause the fork to shudder. I've got a bike with TRP RG957 and 33mm tires and they're great. Plenty of power and modulation. All on aluminum rims in dry conditions.

I had a Cannondale with hydro disc brakes and 32mm tires and the brakes were certainly nice, but not another level.

I just ... I don't understand why the market and most riders are so excitied about disc brakes. They're fine. If you like them, good on you. (I don't really care about using carbon rims, though. I can totally understand if you want to run carbon rims, you should use disc brakes.)

I'm thinking about commissioning a custom Ti frame with medium-reach rim brakes just like the OP and the simplicity just wins me over. I can swap wheelsets without having to worry about shimming the rotors. They're easy to maintain. I can lock up the wheels, so there plenty powerful enough.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Today, 11:50 AM
benb benb is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Eastern MA
Posts: 10,667
Mostly my experience here has been my All City Space Horse. It either had Tiagra (original), Rival, or 105 brake/shifters on it across it's lifetime.

I have never actually had the Avid Shorty Ultimates on it.

I had some TRP Cantis, and I had a lot of TRP CX9s I ran on it.

None of those were great, the Cantis tended to be OK for a tiny bit of time right after I tuned everything, then could go to hell very quickly. Just very frequent maintenance. The CX9s were better but still pretty annoying.

One difference for me (possibly) is you're in CA. I was riding my bike in wet conditions or winter conditions with road salt, there were several things:

- Wet/sand/mud/salt accelerating break pad wear on the rim brakes
- Wet/sand/mud/salt generally making the brakes work worse
- Fast pad wear means more frequent balancing/adusting on Cantis/Vs to make sure the pads are squeezing equally, mechanical ratio is still OK, nothing rubbing
- Salty winter weather has always killed the pivots on Cantis/V-brakes for me, and this bike was my winter bike. I probably should have bought Pauls or something at some point, IIRC the Pauls you could disassemble the pivots on the Pauls to clean and relubricate them. TRP CX9s would basically freeze up for me from salt intrusion and have to be replaced every 1-2 seasons.

On top of that The CX9s were about $100/wheel, and the Avids you mention are $100/wheel. That's actually really expensive at this point considering it doesn't even include levers/cables/housing. $100/wheel today buys pretty serious disc brake performance that has none of the durability issues.

That all city Space Horse has been the most expensive bike I've ever owned in terms of money spent fixing or replacing brakes. Vastly more expensive than disc brake mountain bikes I've had that were rode in the same conditions, and those mountain bikes always had vastly better braking performance.

The SRAM Rival hydraulic caliper is actually cheaper than the Avid shorty, by quite a bit.

Last edited by benb; Today at 11:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old Today, 11:52 AM
truth truth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 663
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhespenheide View Post
Now, if you want to go all-in and mount Racers directly to your frame? Commission a custom steel fork and do the same up front? Go for it. But if you're matching the tire clearance of the Whisky, I'd personally go with the RG957 or the older Shimano BR-600 if you want silver and can hunt them down. Again, my opinion, but the RG957 are 95-97% as good as any modern sidepull.
This is it, get a steel fork and direct mount racers! If not, go with the Shimano mid reach brakes.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.