#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bontrager by Chris King 24h front hub lacing
I have an unused 24h front that I will pair with a 24h Gran Compe F/F rear and BTLOS RC-50 gloss rims. Pillar 2.0/1.8/2.0 spokes. Brass double squares. I'm assuming these were originally all laced radially. Radial looks fine to me, but crossing is classic to my eye. Am I correct that this all comes down to aesthetics and ease of lacing (radial) or is there a compelling reason to choose radial over 2X? Should I consider 1X?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I do 24 hole wheels in a 2 cross pattern. I really don't like the aesthetics and hub flange stress of radial lacing.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Crossed vs. radial lacing:
In the end, there are only minor differences in performance and durability between radial vs. crossed spokes, so if you like the look of radial spokes, that's reason enough to do it. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Radial lacing isn't any easier, to me, than 2 cross lacing. If you'd even consider 1x, just do radial..and remember, when the wheel is spinning, you can't really tell if it's crossed or radial...
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels Qui Si Parla Campagnolo |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Since I suck at math/geometry, help me understand this: Is radial lighter just because each spoke length is shorter (and therefore uses less material), or is there something else involved in this weight-savings?
Thx |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Yep.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Ha, sounds about right, I almost spilled my coffee laughing at this one!
|
|
|