#31
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
What I was doing before that is largely irrelevant unless I have a many page cv full of incredible accomplishments. Keep it simple and no one will know your as old as their parents... |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
I agree. If you've been in the work force for a while, no need to list the first job on the resume anymore.
__________________
http://less-than-epic.blogspot.com/ |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Just some skinny guy, likes bikes. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
If you're ready to start looking for a new job, why not lay it out for the current boss and let them know why this isn't working. I mean, what do you have to loose? Seems like you enjoy what you were hired to do, might as well throw the hail mary.
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I might remove some of that old info. However, if I want to show more than my current employer, I'll have to go back more than 15 years. If I include my previous employer, that will go back 21 years. If I show the one prior to that it's 28 years. Might go with current plus last two. |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
I know of two people at my current employer who have done that in the past couple years. Local management did not offer to take any of their reasoning into consideration or review. The first one was walked out a few weeks later. The second already had an offer but would have remained if they were willing to have some dialogue. His talking points were ignored and was more-or-less told if you don't like it you're free to go. Both were department managers.
Last edited by Red Tornado; 11-02-2024 at 07:48 AM. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
- I was good friends with my boss to the extent that they've appointed me to be a godparent of their child - my boss 110% held the needs of their direct reports above the company's needs I would only go as far as to lightly make suggestions for improvement, but never say I'm considering leaving. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
I think the job market has turned around after a long phase of being job seeker friendly. So the nasties who've been keeping it under wraps are unleashing their pent-up angst. For people who like to get stuff done, that's enough to kick off a job search.
When I interview people, I want to know what they're going to be like to work with. If someone volunteers they're leaving a toxic culture, I find that perfectly believable and reasonable and move the conversation on. If they go on and on with gory details, ignoring my body language and lack of active listening cues, I'm going to start thinking this person is carrying baggage that might interfere with their performance. Sometimes it's a long-winded and clearly rehearsed performance. It's not a hard no at that point, but leaning that way. This happens more than one might expect. |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I think the idea with the 10 year window is that it's not necessarily discriminating against older people (as one employee stated, "we like grey hair here") but it allows them to see what you've done in recent and relevant times. Some of my coworkers essentially retired from completely different fields and then took on their current job as a new career. A ten year window would show lack of experience if a young person applied, like college age people wouldn't have 10 years of experience to list. However, one of my coworkers was a sophomore in college. I'm pretty sure he didn't have much more than 4 years of work experience, and he was hired as a fill in for the position I just vacated. The company I work for looks for people who like working with people. The skillset is not as critical as the company can teach skills and the rules. The company offers enormous back office support. Such a company might be good for a people person looking to change careers. For example my team leader was a trained chef before he worked at this company. My permanent replacement used to be a school teacher. I came from (most recently) auto service, and I was in IT and had a bike shop. |
|
|