Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Today, 08:02 AM
merckxman merckxman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: western NJ
Posts: 1,503
NJ: Driver had suspended license when killed bicyclist

https://www.nj.com/monmouth/2024/10/...cials-say.html

".....He was charged with third-degree operating a motor vehicle with a suspended license while being involved in a fatal crash, authorities said....."

I believe that charge falls under assault by auto, 3-5 year prison term. Maybe an attorney here can clarify. Let's see where this goes.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Today, 09:01 AM
benb benb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Eastern MA
Posts: 10,582
Just happened in our town in the last couple months.

We got some of those flexible bollards put up in the crosswalk as a result and what I think is the only ghost bike in town. There has been one other cyclist killed since I moved here but it was right in the center of town and the powers that be probably stopped a ghost bike from getting put up in the center of town at what is an incredibly dangerous intersection.

No signs the driver is getting any criminal charges in this latest one:

- Cyclist was walking in the crosswalk, not riding
- Driver had a suspended license
- Driver was supposedly speeding - 25mph limit but almost all cars go 40mph there
- Driver was looking at cell phone
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Today, 09:15 AM
CAAD CAAD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,251
People will never change their behavior until we strictly impose actual consequences for these types of crimes. I have zero faith in the justice system when it comes to these types of cases.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Today, 10:12 AM
Alistair Alistair is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAAD View Post
People will never change their behavior until we strictly impose actual consequences for these types of crimes. I have zero faith in the justice system when it comes to these types of cases.
I don't disagree, but at the same time, we need to do a better job of providing non-automotive means of transportation. Unless bus/rail/bike/foot are viable, bad drivers are going to continue to drive out of necessity, no matter what the law says.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Today, 01:22 PM
bshell bshell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
I don't disagree, but at the same time, we need to do a better job of providing non-automotive means of transportation. Unless bus/rail/bike/foot are viable, bad drivers are going to continue to drive out of necessity, no matter what the law says.

How many people here know anyone that considers themselves to be a 'bad driver'? Few to none, I suspect.

I feel like I'm missing your point above but there is no correlation between being an irresponsible and unsafe person operating a motor vehicle and the availability of public transportation.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Today, 02:23 PM
Alistair Alistair is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by bshell View Post
How many people here know anyone that considers themselves to be a 'bad driver'? Few to none, I suspect.

I feel like I'm missing your point above but there is no correlation between being an irresponsible and unsafe person operating a motor vehicle and the availability of public transportation.
I meant drivers who are bad enough to lose their license. If they can't get to work via alternative transpiration, they're going to keep driving. The US doesn't do a good job at that. And jailing every reckless driver isn't cost effective (and probably a net negative long-term, as those people then lose out of years of potentially productive work/life). But, like I said, it's both - more enforcement AND better transpiration options.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Today, 02:29 PM
Sarhog's Avatar
Sarhog Sarhog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
I meant drivers who are bad enough to lose their license. If they can't get to work via alternative transpiration, they're going to keep driving. The US doesn't do a good job at that. And jailing every reckless driver isn't cost effective (and probably a net negative long-term, as those people then lose out of years of potentially productive work/life). But, like I said, it's both - more enforcement AND better transpiration options.
Not to sidetrack the conversation, and it doesn’t change any of the dynamics, but in my experience as a cop for many years, most suspended licenses are the result of failure to pay child support, or failure to maintain vehicle insurance. “They” are not necessarily bad drivers.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Today, 06:18 PM
dmitrik4 dmitrik4 is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: BurlCo NJ
Posts: 346
Bad drivers are going to exist no matter what, so the infrastructure needs to account for that. And yes, there need to be more consequences for striking a person with your car.
__________________
mike | bad at bikes
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.