Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old Yesterday, 12:45 PM
EB EB is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: This is a no biking trail, California
Posts: 2,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McM View Post
Using a wider tire on the front to improve grip and control on rougher surfaces is nothing new. In the early days of MTBs, before MTB suspension forks were developed, this was common.
Still common! 2.5 front 2.4 rear is a very common setup, sometimes even 2.6 F 2.3 R. Front and rear tires do different things, so these setups make perfect sense.

I wouldn't worry about a mm or two in stack change. Once you run a lower pressure in the wider tire in front, it's probably all a wash anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old Yesterday, 12:47 PM
tellyho tellyho is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Boston area
Posts: 1,861
I have aesthetic objections but I think they're probably dumb.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old Today, 02:38 AM
Chris(NJ) Chris(NJ) is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by redir View Post
Old school BMX puts the wider tire on front. Go for it.
Yup!! This was always the way when I raced in the 90’s
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old Today, 05:58 AM
vespasianus vespasianus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,331
Don't just go wider, go more aggressive. I run a larger and more aggressive front tire and a faster rolling rear tire. Control can trump pure rolling resistance.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old Today, 08:44 AM
rice rocket's Avatar
rice rocket rice rocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by EB View Post
Still common!
Yep, bikes are sold that way even.......

I.e.

https://www.specialized.com/us/en/ep...382712-4221500
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old Today, 11:16 AM
makoti makoti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NoVa
Posts: 6,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by rice rocket View Post
Yep, bikes are sold that way even.......

I.e.

https://www.specialized.com/us/en/ep...382712-4221500
.05 difference?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old Today, 11:23 AM
EB EB is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: This is a no biking trail, California
Posts: 2,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by makoti View Post
.05 difference?
Better examples:

https://www.santacruzbicycles.com/en-US/bikes/hightower
https://yeticycles.com/bikes/sb160/buy

etc.

2.5 F / 2.4 R is pretty standard for long travel builds. One of the things that I've learned on the Paceline is that 2.5mm really, really matters sometimes
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old Today, 11:57 AM
Grateful Rider Grateful Rider is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 67
I was running Gravelking X1 45's and got puncture in rear. Only tire I had on hand to replace it was a Tufo Speedero 40. Thought it would be temporary, but to be honest the combo works really well for the mixed terrain I like to ride.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old Today, 01:23 PM
rice rocket's Avatar
rice rocket rice rocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by makoti View Post
.05 difference?
Tell me you don't ride MTBs without telling me you don't ride MTBs....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.