#166
|
|||
|
|||
My carbon bike
is unsafe and may snap at any moment.
|
#167
|
|||
|
|||
I have to give theRivendell folks a little more credit--they clearly know the ins and outs of sizing and can steer you to a French fit if you want the bars up, or to a Roadini with a threadless fork, a long steer tube and lots of spacers:
From the Roadini description on rivbike.com: "Sizing Measure your PBH. Here's a link to how. For a "race fit" with more seat post showing, subtract 27cm from your pbh and go with the closest size. If your PBH is 87, you'd subtract 27 and get 60; you could go with a 59 or 61. If you want higher bars, go bigger. If you want more post showing, go smaller. You'll have crotch-room either way. You can go small and leave the steerer long, to get the bars up." |
#168
|
|||
|
|||
I'm just saying that given the huge stem height and the more than fistfull saddle height it might make more sense to have a larger frame with less seatpost and less stem showing. If the stem were slammed, or simply at a reasonable height I wouldnt say that.
|
#169
|
|||
|
|||
But then again, if you wanted a bike that fit a conventional aesthetic, why would you choose a Rivendell?
__________________
Instagram - DannAdore Bicycles |
#170
|
|||
|
|||
But its still Grant's approach to sizing. For many builders, PBH doesnt even factor into things as they dont build to standover. For a given rider standover may or may not be a consideration. For a new rider, it might not even occur to them that they might not in fact need standover clearance.
|
#171
|
|||
|
|||
If you go threadless with a lot of spacers and an inverse Cinelli track stem you end up with a lighter-stronger- and stiffer front end .
|
#172
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|