|
View Poll Results: 2021 New Bike Purchase Options | |||
Trek Emonda SLR | 12 | 63.16% | |
Pinarello | 1 | 5.26% | |
Colnago | 4 | 21.05% | |
Shimano component tier? | 4 | 21.05% | |
Carbon wheelset choice? | 3 | 15.79% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
10+ years ownership. Long term the SL is the better frame. I believe that SLR frames (having seen damaged frames) are too brittle. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Speedy Decal...lots of logo options
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Is your experience with the 2021 frame or earlier models? The 2021 SLR OCLV 800 is purported to be stiffer, but stronger. They claim that's why they were able to make the entire frame more aero without adding weight. What Trek claims, but maybe not accurate in practice? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Earlier model, '17. My understanding is that Trek is using the same type of carbon composite.....Trek speak 800. The layup scheduling for the new '21 model is different but not the carbon itself.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
"2 years in development" "800 OCLV fibers 30% stronger while retaining same stiffness" "we can use less of it than a different type of carbon w/ same effect" https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/oclv-800/ |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Given the options you presented, I'd go with the Emonda -- an excellent bike which you can ride immediately. Also, likely, it's easier to deal with Trek about any warranty issues that may arise than with 'Nago or Pina.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I own C64 Disk and nothing compares in terms of power transmission and handling to it. I love it, but always worry that something may happen to it. Moots RSL Disk - all metal, no worries, but a bit sluggish compared to C64.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Do you find the C64 is a little more forgiving on the body? Would the say the geometry isn't as aero as the other bikes? I can't spend as much time in the saddle as I used to and trying to avoid sore back/neck issues? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
C64, I have the compact version, is pretty forgiving, while plenty stiff, and geometry works well for me. Aero is not a priority for me as I tend to climb a lot, and it is a great climber. Here in the Bay Area we do not have long flats.
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Are you still looking for a Colnago? My body size and proportions are similar to your description. I am 5’11, with a long torso. In addition, I’m very flexible. So, my bike setup does not need a lot of drop to achieve an aero position. In Colnago, I ride a 54s, which has a 56.5 cm top tube, with a 120mm, 10d stem. My saddle height, bb to top of saddle is 74cm. Over the past few years, I had a C60 but felt it was a punishing frame. I switched to Concept and found it was more comfortable. In 2019, I went to the C64 rim brake. Relative to the C60, the C64 dropped weight and designed in some compliance. Recently, I added the C64 disc. The frame rides the same as the rim brake version. The bike feels more solid because the additional weight in the front from the calipers and levers and the larger feeling levers. If you’re in the Bay Area, I let you try a bike. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
.
__________________
🏻* |
Tags |
colnago, pinarello, shimano, trek, trek emonda carbon |
|
|