#35
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The U.S. is years behind digital payments, and if it weren't for Apple Pay the best "digital" payment you'd get would be a card with a chip — even "tap and pay" with your card was pretty novel until a few years ago. My fianceé (who is Swedish) had to do her taxes last year in the U.S. and the nature of her visa she had to do all her quarterly payments with check as a first time tax payer. She'd never even seen a checkbook. For the "run it like a business crowd" — I wonder how that really offers a solution, as UPS and FedEx only fair marginally better and also rely on USPS for all their "last mile" deliveries. They don't actually do the entire route, whereas USPS is forced by law to do so (even if they need to contract it out). First class mail peaked in 2001 and it's now down to the volume not seen since 1968. The number of employees peaked around 1999 and we're now down to levels we had in the 1980s. However, packages that require enormous amounts of space, are slower to meter and sort, have skyrocketed. It's really not a surprise things are they way they are. People in the U.S. are used to the service as it exists and have a certain expectation, but the funding for the USPS and lack of long-term investments don't line up with that. A simple change that would align with postal services in other countries and save an enormous amount of time and resources would simply be to end home delivery of packages, hold them at the post office for people to pick up, but it would feel like such a shocking change for people they'd never go for it. The mandate to deliver is a main reason the service isn't profitable. Either you accept the loss and fund it to a level that the service is better, cut out routes that are clearly not profitable (sorry everyone who lives in rural areas), or massively increase the cost of shipping. Last edited by meyatt; Today at 06:38 AM. |
|
|