Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Yesterday, 10:14 AM
windsurfer windsurfer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SB and Central Coast, Ca
Posts: 373
New Santa Barbara bike laws

Some EBiker behavior backlash in SB

Cant find text of the rules anywhere, but several articles include the statements "riders must ride single file, use bike lanes" and organized group ride will be prohibited.

https://www.noozhawk.com/santa-barba...ike-ordinance/

https://www.independent.com/2024/10/...santa-barbara/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Yesterday, 10:54 AM
windsurfer windsurfer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SB and Central Coast, Ca
Posts: 373
Here is the text...
Attached Files
File Type: pdf ordinance_10.15.24.pdf (316.9 KB, 18 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Yesterday, 10:57 AM
Mark McM Mark McM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,602
I wonder if these local ordinances are all ;egal? In most states, local ordinances can't supercede state laws. So for example, if state law allows bicycles (e-bikes) to ride double file, a local ordinance can't require them to ride single file. A local town near me tried to make special laws governing bicycles on the local roads, but they were shot down because they violated state laws.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Yesterday, 11:49 AM
BumbleBeeDave's Avatar
BumbleBeeDave BumbleBeeDave is offline
Post Mod-ern
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The end of the road . . .
Posts: 19,925
Laws like this . . .

. . . will remain in place until they ticket a group ride with some lawyers in it.

BBD
__________________
--- __0 __0 __0
----_-\<,_ -\<,
_(_)(_)/_(_)/ (_)
A thing of beauty is a joy forever--Keats
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Yesterday, 12:01 PM
BumbleBeeDave's Avatar
BumbleBeeDave BumbleBeeDave is offline
Post Mod-ern
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The end of the road . . .
Posts: 19,925
All sorts of amusing parts to this . . .

--ordinance calls them "electronic bicycles."

--7. Engaging in racing or speed contests while riding on a public street, public right of away, sidewalk, bicycle path, lane, or trail . . . The county and/or town line sprint is not outlawed!

--8. Intentionally swerving or riding around stopped or slowed traffic . . . so no passing on the right?

--10. Operating a bicycle or e-conveyance at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing taking into account the weather, pedestrian and vehicular traffic, and the surface and width of the sidewalk or roadway. . . . Seems like it would be dependent on the skill of the operator.

--C. All bicycles and electric bicycles shall have reflectors affixed to both the front and back wheels and on the rear of the bicycle or electric bicycle. . . . Tailor made for profiling.

I don't see anything in this that prohibits a "group ride." Of course if it did, they would have to give a definition of what constitutes a "group."

You can bet this is just like hundreds of laws across the country that are enforced only when the rider happens to be the wrong color or ethnicity.

BBD
__________________
--- __0 __0 __0
----_-\<,_ -\<,
_(_)(_)/_(_)/ (_)
A thing of beauty is a joy forever--Keats
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Yesterday, 12:16 PM
HenryA HenryA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,086
Don’t let him catch you popping a wheelie!

It sounds like this group graduated from being in charge of an HOA. This is what you get when you support having a lot of government.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Yesterday, 12:47 PM
jm714 jm714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by HenryA View Post
Don’t let him catch you popping a wheelie!

It sounds like this group graduated from being in charge of an HOA. This is what you get when you support having a lot of government.
I live in a tourist beach town where the bikers are out of control whether or not they are tourists using rental bikes, local kids getting around town or the surfers using e-bikes to get to the local breaks and avoid parking hassles. Not only are they breaking a number of laws, crossing double yellows, running lights and stop signs, riding on sidewalks, no helmets etc etc. Then you have the local hoodlum kids popping wheelies as they go against traffic and vandalizing property and throwing soda etc at pedestrians, cars (my neighbor) and other cyclists (me and others I know). They have figured out they can get an away with it because escape is so easy. Law enforcement is basically neutered and people are calling for something to be done. It’s not over reaching government its residents and businesses wanting some sort of action to be taken.

Unfortunately nothing is really going to be done until some cute little 12 year old girl meets the front end of a vehicle when she runs that stop light or sign. Then everyone will cry how did it get this way and its so tragic.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Yesterday, 01:11 PM
bigbill bigbill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hackberry, AZ
Posts: 4,002
If it's necessary to manage the e-bike crowd, I can see that. Local laws or ordinances that run contrary to state laws will remain in place until someone challenges them in court. I don't believe that the state seeks out localities violating state statutes. I think the locals are counting on apathy from the bike crowd to just complain but not legally challenge.

I ran into this issue in VA Beach. One neighborhood HOA insisted that cyclists stay under 15 mph, while the posted limit is 25. I saw cyclists ticketed for running stop signs, but never speeding even though someone would usually walk up on the cop and cyclist to complain.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Yesterday, 01:12 PM
dgauthier dgauthier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm714 View Post
I live in a tourist beach town where the bikers are out of control whether or not they are tourists using rental bikes, local kids getting around town or the surfers using e-bikes to get to the local breaks and avoid parking hassles. Not only are they breaking a number of laws, crossing double yellows, running lights and stop signs, riding on sidewalks, no helmets etc etc. Then you have the local hoodlum kids popping wheelies as they go against traffic and vandalizing property and throwing soda etc at pedestrians, cars (my neighbor) and other cyclists (me and others I know). They have figured out they can get an away with it because escape is so easy. Law enforcement is basically neutered and people are calling for something to be done. It’s not over reaching government its residents and businesses wanting some sort of action to be taken.

Unfortunately nothing is really going to be done until some cute little 12 year old girl meets the front end of a vehicle when she runs that stop light or sign. Then everyone will cry how did it get this way and its so tragic.
An e-bike is to a motorcycle as a low speed vehicle is to a car. (Low speed vehicles are neighborhood ev's and golf carts.)

To drive a low speed vehicle on public roads in California you must have a driver's license or learner's permit and auto insurance. Since those laws are already in place, I don't think it's a stretch to say when riding on public roads an e-bike rider must have the same qualifications as a motorcycle rider.

Last edited by dgauthier; Yesterday at 01:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Yesterday, 01:20 PM
jm714 jm714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgauthier View Post
An e-bike is to a motorcycle as a low speed vehicle is to a car. (Low speed vehicles are neighborhood ev's and golf carts.)

To drive a low speed vehicle in California you must have a driver's license or learner's permit and auto insurance. Since that's the case, I don't think it's a stretch to say an e-bike rider must have the same qualifications as a motorcycle rider.
What’s your point? Because it’s written about ad nauseum on the local FB pages about licenses, permits, insurance and helmets.

In my city there are 70,000 residents. Last time I talked to the police chief he has 5/6 officers on patrol at a time. One of them Monday-Friday is a motor officer whose sole duty is traffic enforcement. E-bikes aren’t a priority. So ordinances will be passed but enforcement wont happen.

And as I said, on an ebike it’s pretty easy to ditch the cops as the kids have figured out.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old Yesterday, 01:35 PM
dgauthier dgauthier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm714 View Post
What’s your point? (...)
My point is e-bikes are currently treated like bicycles under the law. They should be classified as motor vehicles. Period.

https://www.calbike.org/california-e...lassifications

Last edited by dgauthier; Yesterday at 01:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Yesterday, 01:53 PM
jm714 jm714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgauthier View Post
My point is e-bikes are currently treated like bicycles under the law. They should be classified as motor vehicles. Period.

https://www.calbike.org/california-e...lassifications
Without enforcement it doesn’t matter. Then when it does get enforced the kids parents will be at a city council screaming about the unfair treatment of their kid. And how it’s just a bike and you’re hurting how they get around town. Then enforcement will be modified (reduced).

Thus my comment about just wait till the cute little girl gets smashed then we will be back at the same city council meeting demanding enforcement happen or something else.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Yesterday, 01:56 PM
dgauthier dgauthier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm714 View Post
Without enforcement it doesn’t matter. Then when it does get enforced the kids parents will be at a city council screaming about the unfair treatment of their kid. And how it’s just a bike and you’re hurting how they get around town. Then enforcement will be modified (reduced).

Thus my comment about just wait till the cute little girl gets smashed then we will be back at the same city council meeting demanding enforcement happen or something else.
If e-bikes are classified as motor vehicles, and have the same requirements as motorcycles, kids won't be riding them until they're 16 and have gotten their license. Which would be perfect.

Last edited by dgauthier; Yesterday at 01:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old Yesterday, 02:14 PM
jm714 jm714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgauthier View Post
If e-bikes are classified as motor vehicles, and have the same requirements as motorcycles, kids won't be riding them until they're 16 and have gotten their license. Which would be perfect.
It wont happen in California. Do you know why? Unfortunately this is going to sound political and it isn’t meant to be political. It is just the reality of the situation. Once you start requiring licenses and insurance for e-bikes then that is going to mean another class of people are going to be caught up in enforcement and once that happens the legislators of this fine state will lose their sh1t.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old Yesterday, 02:32 PM
cgolvin's Avatar
cgolvin cgolvin is offline
#RYFB
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: The Boss Basin
Posts: 5,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm714 View Post
Without enforcement it doesn’t matter.
I think this is the salient point, and applies well beyond the subject of this thread. From mobile phone use while driving to running red lights to <insert_your_pet_peeve>, if the police aren't there to enforce the law then the law is irrelevant.

My forecast is that, if the city council approves the law, it will cause a brief period of enforcement after which it will become irrelevant.

Digression: In my neighborhood, a collaboration between residents and Dept of Transportation following development that dramatically increased traffic volume put in place some controls intended to regulate the flow. That included a left turn ban during morning rush hour at a particular intersection. Traffic police patrolled and warned/ticketed offenders for the first couple of months after it was put in place, then stopped. Years have passed and there is now a very steady flow of cars turning left in the morning; I would guess that most drivers are ignorant that the restriction is even there. Earlier this week I encountered three motorcycle cops harvesting violators like shooting fish in a barrel; I guess that either someone will pull complained or they just decided it was easy money. Either way, it made me smile.
__________________
Gios Peg Bixxis
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.