Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Today, 05:16 PM
BumbleBeeDave's Avatar
BumbleBeeDave BumbleBeeDave is offline
Post Mod-ern
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The end of the road . . .
Posts: 19,942
Tree-climbing gear for my gravel bike?

On my Lynskey Pro GR I’m currently running a Shimano GRX 31-48 crank on the front with the rest of the group eight-year old Ultegra 6800 11-speed with 11-36 on the back. I’m a spinner, and this 31-36 combo is just not low enough for me.

The Ultegra needs to be replaced anyway, as it's eight years old and has seen a lot of miles, plus my left brake lever (hydraulic) is not working really well any more. I want new stuff.

I’m planning to replace the rest of the Ultegra with mechanical GRX and keep the current crankset, if possible, given that I just bought it a few months ago. But the lowest I can get with the two ring GRX group is that same 31-36 combo.

Is anyone here running a mullet setup with a bigger cog in the back for lower gearing? If so, what parts are you using and how reliably does this setup work? I’d like to run at least a 42 cog in the back and possibly higher.

Also, I know a one ring setup would let me run a 40 front and something ridiculously big in the back for lower gearing. But what are the disadvantages–if any–of only having 11 active gears instead of the 22 with the two-ring setup? Too big a jump between gears? If you ride this setup has that been a problem for you?

Any comments/advice appreciated! I don’t want to get this all bought and built up and find it doesn’t do what I need/want.

BBD
__________________
--- __0 __0 __0
----_-\<,_ -\<,
_(_)(_)/_(_)/ (_)
A thing of beauty is a joy forever--Keats
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Today, 05:31 PM
EB EB is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: This is a no biking trail, California
Posts: 2,849
As far as I know, the furthest that you can stretch this is with a Wolf Tooth RoadLink, but that won't get you farther than an 11-40 cassette in 11 speed. Lowest ratio with your small ring would be 31/40 = 0.775. This is pretty low!

I've been in your shoes, and I switched to 1x12 systems, which provide access to 10-50, 10-51, and 10-52 cassettes depending on whether you are using GRX or SRAM flavors. This will give you the stump-pulling gear that you're after without sacrificing too much top end and with reasonable ratio gaps. Chainring choice of course terrain and geography-dependent. A 40 tooth chainring on a 10-51 gives you a low gear of 0.78, very similar to the 31/40 possible with a RoadLink on your current setup. Going to a 38T chainring gets you to 0.74, which is lower.

Caveat that I do not ride in big packs anymore, nor do mind the gearing gaps while riding solo - if either of these two things are important to your riding, 1x may or may not be for you. Otherwise, that's my recommended route.

Last edited by EB; Today at 05:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Today, 05:36 PM
truth truth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 659
Quote:
Originally Posted by BumbleBeeDave View Post
On my Lynskey Pro GR I’m currently running a Shimano GRX 31-48 crank on the front with the rest of the group eight-year old Ultegra 6800 11-speed with 11-36 on the back. I’m a spinner, and this 31-36 combo is just not low enough for me.

The Ultegra needs to be replaced anyway, as it's eight years old and has seen a lot of miles, plus my left brake lever (hydraulic) is not working really well any more. I want new stuff.

I’m planning to replace the rest of the Ultegra with mechanical GRX and keep the current crankset, if possible, given that I just bought it a few months ago. But the lowest I can get with the two ring GRX group is that same 31-36 combo.

Is anyone here running a mullet setup with a bigger cog in the back for lower gearing? If so, what parts are you using and how reliably does this setup work? I’d like to run at least a 42 cog in the back and possibly higher.

Also, I know a one ring setup would let me run a 40 front and something ridiculously big in the back for lower gearing. But what are the disadvantages–if any–of only having 11 active gears instead of the 22 with the two-ring setup? Too big a jump between gears? If you ride this setup has that been a problem for you?

Any comments/advice appreciated! I don’t want to get this all bought and built up and find it doesn’t do what I need/want.

BBD
I've done 40 and 42 with Ultegra and Ultegra RX RDs. It works, the shifting's not 100% crisp.

What 11 speed 11-36 cassette do you use?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Today, 05:39 PM
BumbleBeeDave's Avatar
BumbleBeeDave BumbleBeeDave is offline
Post Mod-ern
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The end of the road . . .
Posts: 19,942
It's a SRAM . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by truth View Post
I've done 40 and 42 with Ultegra and Ultegra RX RDs. It works, the shifting's not 100% crisp.

What 11 speed 11-36 cassette do you use?
Not sure what exact part number.
__________________
--- __0 __0 __0
----_-\<,_ -\<,
_(_)(_)/_(_)/ (_)
A thing of beauty is a joy forever--Keats
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Today, 06:00 PM
cgolvin's Avatar
cgolvin cgolvin is offline
#RYFB
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: The Boss Basin
Posts: 5,607
Nothing to offer on the specific components you've got, but on what follows, I do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BumbleBeeDave View Post
Also, I know a one ring setup would let me run a 40 front and something ridiculously big in the back for lower gearing. But what are the disadvantages–if any–of only having 11 active gears instead of the 22 with the two-ring setup? Too big a jump between gears? If you ride this setup has that been a problem for you?
I ended up going 1x on my allroad bike, using Ekar, with a 38 chainring and a 9-42 cassette. While not quite as low as your 31-36, it's a plenty low gear for anything I encounter. The tradeoffs are the big (6 tooth) jumps to the final two cogs and the not-quite-big-enough 38-9 big gear while descending. The smaller portion of the cassette has 1 and 2 tooth jumps so it's no problem finding a good cadence on the flats, I just accept that when climbing steeper things I'll make do with a less than perfect cadence, no problem.

And remember that your 2x system doesn't really have 22 unique gears, there's plenty of overlap. I still much prefer 2x for the road but I'm finding this 1x setup works very well for mixed surface (and even for pure pavement).
__________________
Gios Peg Bixxis
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Today, 06:28 PM
fa63's Avatar
fa63 fa63 is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,225
This is the main problem for me with 1x; the jump between cogs. Some people seem not sensitive to it at all but I guess I am.

You could switch out to a Shimano 46/30 crankset in the front, and also go with a 11/40 cassette in the rear. I don't think the 6800 rear derailleur will work with that cassette without a RoadLink; people report that the newer RX or GRX derailleurs can.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BumbleBeeDave View Post
Also, I know a one ring setup would let me run a 40 front and something ridiculously big in the back for lower gearing. But what are the disadvantages–if any–of only having 11 active gears instead of the 22 with the two-ring setup? Too big a jump between gears? If you ride this setup has that been a problem for you?

Last edited by fa63; Today at 06:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Today, 06:36 PM
hokoman hokoman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lisbon PT & Brooklyn NY
Posts: 2,199
The white industries cranks have jumps as high as 20 teeth from the small to large. I replaced a 50/34 with a 46/30. I also have a set of cranks that are 44/24 - those are going on a bikepacking bike, so can't comment on the shifting, but can't imagine that WI would sell a terrible shifting crankset.

Something like this might work well...they offer chainrings in 2 teeth increments so you can customize. More expensive up front, but might be a better solution for lower gearing than going bigger cassette jumps.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Today, 06:52 PM
SlowPokePete's Avatar
SlowPokePete SlowPokePete is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Hillsdale, NY
Posts: 2,343
Curious if the 30/46 from a FRX610 would fit your crankset....

SPP
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Today, 07:23 PM
bikinchris bikinchris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 4,515
Scratch all of that. Get a Road Link and put a cassette with a 42 tooth low gear and be done with it.
__________________
Forgive me for posting dumb stuff.
Chris
Little Rock, AR
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.