View Single Post
  #115  
Old 06-20-2018, 09:09 AM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McM View Post
Friction Facts did some testing on drive losses between typical large and small chainrings (53 & 39) different rear sprocket sizes for their study on the best gear selection for efficiency. Bike Radar had an article on their data and findings. The published data suggests that the 1x system, with its smaller chainring and larger cross-chaining angles, may be losing up to 2 - 3 Watts in some gear combinations (the worst would be the 42x9). The losses will be smaller in other gear combinations, but even still, the extra losses will probably not be compensated for by the lower weight of a 1x system, except maybe up the steepest climbs (but if bikes are already at the minimum weight allowed by the rules, they may not be able to harvest any gains from weight savings). There may be some aero gains with a 1x system, but I don't think this has ever been quantified.
Considering these 1by is also disc, no 'aero' advantage overall, I suspect.
Marketing, IMHO...I don't see that 1by For The Road answers any question, solves and problem. IMHO, of course..
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote