Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kurt
I can't see all the negative stuff re 007, people should be thrilled for someone like craig @ the helm - moore? brosnan? please - we should be lucky that the franchise lasted this long. it was no casio, so what - he is just getting used to the role & he is going to be around for a long time based on what I see. I am not into men @ all but man those eyes!
Star Trek looks off the hook to me, like you I am a big a$$ trek fan, that I cannot wait for.
|
Word. Casino Royale blew me away, the plot, script were equal to the acting. Quantum, it was predictable in the sense that yes, we knew the next scene before it began. The opening scene...once he pulled over, I could hear the crowd in the theater exhale as they were blown away by the car chase.
The female role, she didn't do it for me and I dunno how I feel about Fields' death as it was too much Goldfinger meets OPEC; I need to see it again and I will. Bond's job for the Quantum of Solace mission was a sequel, we had a strong hunch of the sequence of events...imagine seeing it without having seen Casino Royale (as my friend's girlfriend did)? It was a great stand-alone movie, but sequels are tough to pull off. So now, now we'll see what the next mission is and just what Bond has up his sleeve.
My friend mentioned that Quantum lacked some Bond one-liners, it's important to keep Bond witty.