Quote:
Originally Posted by cgolvin
I could see making the case for Bonds as the better pure hitter (possible for Ted Williams too) but not the better complete player. And, while comparisons across long time periods are difficult, simply the fact that Ruth did not compete against half of the best ballplayers of his age nullifies the disparity IMO. And, again, as a complete player, no comparison even with Ruth's pitching achievements.
I'm curious who you have ahead of him. Griffey?
|
How does that big headed juicer even get into this conversation?