View Single Post
  #73  
Old 05-13-2024, 01:32 PM
Ttx1 Ttx1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Boston
Posts: 356
Maybe a road cycling brand did not have the elasticity to appeal to MTB, in a MTB community.

Maybe the absence of classic references and cineastes to deliver the message failed to sustain whatever community had been built.

Maybe the lack of expansion into potential markets - even as seasonal popups - made the RCC community hard to sustain or build.

Maybe the abandonment of the ambassador Slack channel after the departure of the community manager in a single season - with no communication and no effort to maintain - was a clear harbinger of management's approach on a few levels...

Maybe cycling just isn't that precious and the combo of hero worship of cycling celebrities / teams with more authentic experiences (and goods) never made sense in the first place (Team Sky / Froome).

Rapha needed to follow a premium contemporary apparel playbook - think Lululemon - and instead they went chasing after a bunch of boondoggles like lower price points, offbeat sponsorships that noone cared about, prime time sponsorships that noone cared about, side lines that no one cared about, etc.

Rapha was/is also limited by cycling. If the brand was not entirely road-cycling specific, they may have tapped in to the premium running segment, like Tracksmith - an obvious growth opportunity for a brand that makes or made well tailored athletic apparel. But that was even more remote than, say, an MTB line.

Rapha was great for a while. Long live Rapha.
Reply With Quote