Quote:
Originally Posted by .RJ
Some of the Lomo films may be rebranded kodak, but not all of them - I've shot Lomo 100 and Lomo '92 and neither of them look like photos from Kodak Vision 250/500 that I've seen.
FWIW, Lomo 100 can be great - punchy colors and contrast and Lomo '92 just looks like expired film. Its kind of ****.
|
I didn't interpret the question to be about Lomography film. I interpreted 'Cine' to mean 'Cinestill'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alistair
I think he’s talking specifically about the film that’s been repurposed from motion picture to 35mm still (which is what I was asking about).
|
Indeed.