30 for 30 Lance part 2. Any changes?
Has the second part of 30 for 30 Lance part 2 made ANY difference in your opinion of Lance?
I saw a huge correlation between him and Michael Jordan in how they thought about their competition. |
no change.. to me he's still 7x winner of TDF
|
Did he apologize to Betsy and Greg?
Did he apologize to Paul Kimmage? Did he not seem like a pathological liar and narcissist? If not, then no, probably not. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But showing even basic human empathy and not, say, apologizing the way he did in the Oprah interview would be a first step. |
Quote:
But you believe that he only used the LA foundation for “cover”. Be fair, there is nothing that would change your opinion. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
My opinion of him is lower.
He's not a victim. |
I know seeing a few pieces of a TV interview with someone doesn't mean you know them, but Anna Hansen seems like a pretty genuine person, nice, smart, attractive.
Couldn't she do better? |
Quote:
What would change my opinion? Retiring from public life and going to help cancer patients without a camera crew around. The comparison I make is Michael Vick. The guy is still working with ASPCA and Humane Society groups today, even after retiring. Do you see it plastered on ESPN? No. But the guy make a horrible mistake, and has done a lot of good work atoning for it. Lance, as always, is all about Lance. This ESPN special is no different and yet another attempt to rehab the image. |
Quote:
I watched all 7 of them bicycle races on TV.. he won. |
Quote:
Again, Lance is not a victim. |
30 for 30 Lance part 2. Any changes
Part 2 much more insightful than Part 1
Would have been nice to have more commentary from other people and less -7 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.