The Paceline Forum

The Paceline Forum (https://forums.thepaceline.net/index.php)
-   General Discussion (https://forums.thepaceline.net/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Vitus 979 (https://forums.thepaceline.net/showthread.php?t=243568)

earlethomas 10-16-2019 06:31 PM

Vitus 979
 
What are your impressions of the Vitus 979? How would it hold up to longer distances, centuries and beyond?

fiamme red 10-16-2019 06:42 PM

Very comfortable frame on rough roads, even with narrow tires (I have 23 mm on mine).

Flexible enough that climbing out of the saddle can lead to ghost shifting. I'd recommend lower gears than on a stiffer frame.

Best for lighter riders, though I still enjoy riding mine at 180 lbs.

You can get a lot more information here: https://on-the-drops.blogspot.com/20...vitus-979.html.

earlethomas 10-16-2019 09:03 PM

Thank for the reply, think I'm going for it...

Fivethumbs 10-16-2019 09:26 PM

Watch this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gez5oR6i_hE

Michael Maddox 10-16-2019 09:41 PM

About 10 years ago, I built one up with a Mavic group.

I read all I could about the mythical tube separations, and found several people who could disassemble and reassemble the bikes using modern adhesives.

I never did it, however. I rode the bike and LOVED it. It just felt COOL to ride. but it was SUPER flexy...one of those bikes where you can SEE the bottom bracket lurching about under heavy loads.

Still, the cool-factor is very high with these.

Louis 10-16-2019 09:51 PM

I got a red one a while back when Nashbar was having a NOS blow-out and was planning on using it, but after taking a hard look decided against it.

They're very nice, but I wouldn't use one for anything more than Sunday ice-cream rides. The bonded fork looks (IMO) to be super-scary and is an accident waiting to happen. Think about how old those glue joints are...

They're lovely frames, but I think they're best suited for either decoration on a wall or very light use. No way would I do any serious riding on one.

Jere 10-17-2019 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by earlethomas (Post 2607572)
What are your impressions of the Vitus 979? How would it hold up to longer distances, centuries and beyond?

Hi
Rode a blue one 30 years ago I think it had Shimano bio pace chain rings
I actually raced the thing !
I’m light so maybe that’s why don’t remember hating it.
I do remember it’s the first bike I learned to put my knee on the top tube
at high speed to keep it from Wobbling you off the road.
I had Harry H from Philadelphia glue the rear brake bridge back on.
Than I had him make me a Cirt bike out of Titanium that’s another long
story

tony_mm 10-17-2019 02:04 AM

Vitus 979
 
I used one 25 years ago. Very comfortable bike.
Like many riders I used it for trainings during the winter etc...

merckx 10-17-2019 05:26 AM

1 Attachment(s)
A Sunday ice cream ride.

Spoker 10-17-2019 07:54 AM

The last 150 km of P-R is where that frame still will do very well.
I heard heavier people breaking the Alans, but not the Vitus. There where way more Alans around though.

tv_vt 10-17-2019 08:02 AM

How do you pronounce Vitus? I always thought it was Vee-tuse, but the guy in that video says Vi-tes.

fiamme red 10-17-2019 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tv_vt (Post 2607792)
How do you pronounce Vitus? I always thought it was Vee-tuse, but the guy in that video says Vi-tes.

You are correct, and the man in the video is not. It's a French company.

ghammer 10-17-2019 08:25 AM

I had one back in the day, and raced it as a junior. I was light(ish) as a 16 year old (66-68kgs), however those frames *did* go unglued at the head tube/downtube joint. We'd use rivets to hold them together and then the bike would last another season or 2. the big advantage was that the bike was very light for its time, but flexed a lot. It was also loud on the creaks, but the bike was generally very good for racing. The fork was no issue, the whole flex thing is exaggerate, the main appeal was that it was very comfortable, tracked straight, but flexed. sure was an eye candy. I think more than the issue of the head tube coming unglued was the disastrous rear derailleur hanger. If you crash, you better pray nobody runs into your rear wheel because that thing was flimsy and would break easily. I'd suggest King Kelly went through a few of those a season. No way that frame survived his torque and the massive km volume he'd put on the bike.

jemdet 10-17-2019 08:44 AM

I occasionally see them locked up here in Brooklyn. There's a guy who rides one around Prospect Park. They look the business.

That being said, I would never ride one. A fellow forum member showed me a photo of a bonded frame (Alan, I believe) that had failed at the headtube during a ride. Completely sheared off. Hard pass.

ultraman6970 10-17-2019 09:04 AM

The quality control for the frames that came to the US and S.america were totally different, the ones that made it to the american market are still up and running fine. If you go to s.america probably you wont find a single one still standing fine at all.

When the market is bigger for a large margin manufacturers really fix the stuff because is not the same to have a market of 5000 bikes a year than 50 bikes a year.

The alan IME lasted less time than the vitus but the contructions were different. One had the tubes screwed to the lugs, the other one was just glued. The other thing is that epoxy glue now a days is totally different than what it was back 70s and 80s. As for the forks, well... no comments, that's the only reason I always talk myself out of getting a 992...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.