fourflys
02-26-2011, 03:37 PM
So, I'm in an Organizational Behavior class and I ran across this tidbit about resolving disputes on ebay and I'm sure it would work elsewhere as well... I thought it was pretty interesting and relevant...
"A study of dispute resolution among eBay buyers and sellers finds that using words that give “face” were more likely than words that attack “face” to result in the settlement of online disputes. Jeanne Brett, Marla Olekans, Ray Friedman, Nathan Goates, Cameron Anderson, and Cara Cherry Lisco studied real disputes being addressed through Square Trade, an online dispute resolution service to which eBay refers unhappy customers. The researchers note that a study by the National Consumer League reported that 41 percent of participants in online trading had problems, often associated with late deliveries. For purposes of the study a “dispute” was defined as a form of conflict in which one party to a transaction makes a claim that the other party rejects.
The researchers point out that most past research on dispute resolution has focused on situational and participant characteristics. In this case they adopted what they call a “language-based” approach based on the perspectives of face theory, essentially arguing that how participants use language to give and attack the face of the other party will have a major impact on results. For example, in filing a claim an unhappy buyer might use polite words that preserve the positive self-image or face of the seller, or they might use negative words that attack this sense of face. Examples of negative words are “agitated, angry, apprehensive, despise, disgusted, frustrated, furious, and hate.”
This study examined 386 eBay-generated disputes processed through Square Trade. Words used in the first social interchange between parties were analyzed. Results showed that expressing negative emotions and giving commands to the other party inhibited dispute resolution, whereas providing a causal explanation, offering suggestions, and communicating firmness all made dispute resolution more likely. An hypothesis that expressing positive emotions would increase the likelihood of dispute resolution was not supported. The study also showed that the longer a dispute played out, the less likely it was to be resolved.
In terms of practical implications the researchers specifically state: “Watch your language; avoid attacking the other’s face either by showing your anger toward them, or expressing contempt; avoid signaling weakness; be firm in your claim. Provide causal accounts that take responsibility and give face.” Finally, they note that these basic principles apply in other dispute resolution contexts, not just online."
source:
Organizational Behavior, Tenth Edition
Chapter 15: Conflict and Negotiation. “Yes” helps open doors
ISBN: 9780470086964 Author: John R. Schermerhorn, James G. Hunt, Richard N. Osborn
copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons
"A study of dispute resolution among eBay buyers and sellers finds that using words that give “face” were more likely than words that attack “face” to result in the settlement of online disputes. Jeanne Brett, Marla Olekans, Ray Friedman, Nathan Goates, Cameron Anderson, and Cara Cherry Lisco studied real disputes being addressed through Square Trade, an online dispute resolution service to which eBay refers unhappy customers. The researchers note that a study by the National Consumer League reported that 41 percent of participants in online trading had problems, often associated with late deliveries. For purposes of the study a “dispute” was defined as a form of conflict in which one party to a transaction makes a claim that the other party rejects.
The researchers point out that most past research on dispute resolution has focused on situational and participant characteristics. In this case they adopted what they call a “language-based” approach based on the perspectives of face theory, essentially arguing that how participants use language to give and attack the face of the other party will have a major impact on results. For example, in filing a claim an unhappy buyer might use polite words that preserve the positive self-image or face of the seller, or they might use negative words that attack this sense of face. Examples of negative words are “agitated, angry, apprehensive, despise, disgusted, frustrated, furious, and hate.”
This study examined 386 eBay-generated disputes processed through Square Trade. Words used in the first social interchange between parties were analyzed. Results showed that expressing negative emotions and giving commands to the other party inhibited dispute resolution, whereas providing a causal explanation, offering suggestions, and communicating firmness all made dispute resolution more likely. An hypothesis that expressing positive emotions would increase the likelihood of dispute resolution was not supported. The study also showed that the longer a dispute played out, the less likely it was to be resolved.
In terms of practical implications the researchers specifically state: “Watch your language; avoid attacking the other’s face either by showing your anger toward them, or expressing contempt; avoid signaling weakness; be firm in your claim. Provide causal accounts that take responsibility and give face.” Finally, they note that these basic principles apply in other dispute resolution contexts, not just online."
source:
Organizational Behavior, Tenth Edition
Chapter 15: Conflict and Negotiation. “Yes” helps open doors
ISBN: 9780470086964 Author: John R. Schermerhorn, James G. Hunt, Richard N. Osborn
copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons