View Full Version : 3T Ergosum -- Opinions?
Keith A
12-25-2009, 12:37 PM
I've been riding shallow drop round bars for a long time and am perfectly happy with them. I have Deda Newtons and 215s along with the Ritchey Classic bars. I've tried several ergo shaped bars and I just haven't like them as much as the classic round shape.
However, the shape of the new 3T Ergosum has piqued my interest and I was wondering if anyone has tried these yet. BTW, I'm looking at their Pro level which are aluminum.
Thanks in advance.
Mr. Butterworth
12-25-2009, 12:43 PM
They're pretty great bars. They have a variable radius drop, which are really nice and have a few comfortable positions. The tops allow a flatter transition between bar and shifter than any traditional round bar I've used. My only complaint is that on some setups I've used the reach from the drops to the brake lever can be quite long. Other than that little gripe, these are one of my favorite bar types.
Put some of the alloy ones on my cross bike for the last couple of races of the season -- I like 'em.
Bruce K
12-25-2009, 04:51 PM
I've got a set on the Bedford and like them so far (+/-700 miles).
BK
SEABREEZE
12-25-2009, 11:03 PM
Keith, when you get a chance, head over to forum serotta bikes.
You will see just what you are asking about
click on Brand spankin' new Ottrott for girls!
old_school
12-26-2009, 07:38 AM
I am probably the lone dissenter, but I found the bars awkward. The tops are actually quite comfortable. The reach, though measured by 3t at 89, feels much longer due to flat ramp. The transition into the drops is a very tight angle, and as one accustomed to classic drop bars, the hand positioning, as well as the long reach to short drop ratio, to me seemed odd. Again, that is just one opinion. I think Cervelos are standard with those bars, perhaps you can test ride a set in advance of purchasing.
mosca
12-27-2009, 02:35 PM
I made some comments on this thread (http://forums.thepaceline.net/showthread.php?t=64072)
The Ergosum is maybe the only bar with this combo of long reach and shallow drop. If you don't want as much reach, the Ergonova or Deda zero100 have a similar shape but reach is shorter. My Uniscasi's top tube is at the short end of the spectrum for me, so the long reach was ideal to get the hoods where I want them. Shape-wise they are much nicer than the Newton ergos that they replaced due to the shallower drop and more normal curved hooks - imho, of course.
jazznap
12-29-2009, 10:00 PM
I have them on two of my bikes. I really like the shape. I have both the pro and the team. Funny thing is the carbon bars seems to vibrate more on long bumpy descents (10-12mi) that cause my hands to numb. Haven't tried the pro on that route so I don't know if the same is true for those.
For those riding the Ergosum, is there any flare in the drops? If I order a set in 44, how wide would they be at the hoods? Thanks.
mosca
03-03-2010, 11:21 PM
For those riding the Ergosum, is there any flare in the drops? If I order a set in 44, how wide would they be at the hoods? Thanks.
My 42s measure about 41.5 c-c at the hoods.
bluesea
03-04-2010, 09:10 AM
I've been riding shallow drop round bars for a long time and am perfectly happy with them. I have Deda Newtons and 215s along with the Ritchey Classic bars. I've tried several ergo shaped bars and I just haven't like them as much as the classic round shape.
However, the shape of the new 3T Ergosum has piqued my interest and I was wondering if anyone has tried these yet. BTW, I'm looking at their Pro level which are aluminum.
Thanks in advance.
Don't these newer ergo shapes position the brake lever tips farther out, thus requiring a higher hand position to access the levers?
Nothing wrong with that but I do like the moderate-low drop classic Ritchey, because its rounded shape allows the flexibility for an additional lower hand position that can still access the lever tips. For me the only minor fly-in-the-ointment for the Ritchey is its use of a small radius bend in the 90 degree turn from the flats to the drops. Till you get used to it, makes it more susceptible to occasional wrist impacts.
ahumblecycler
03-04-2010, 10:34 AM
I love these bars. I have them on 2 of my road bikes (Pro and Team version). I have been riding with DA7800 with the Pro, and like them a lot. I did reduce my stem length by 10mm, but it is now too close. I am going to drop a few spaces, which in my opinion, is ideal versus a higher stack height and longer stem.
The Team will be set up with Record 11 levers. The Lynskey is waiting for my return so I cannot report Campy/erogsum compatibility (from my perspective).
FYI, I have bought the Team at the price of the Pro. It was on a demo with LBS. I seriously doubt I would buy a CF bar ... quite happy with every alloy I have ever used.
My 42s measure about 41.5 c-c at the hoods.
OK - thanks for clarifying. Not much flare it would appear. Sounds like I would need a 42 then since I usually prefer bars that are 42 at the hoods.
pdmtong
03-04-2010, 01:00 PM
flare?
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.