dnovo
12-24-2003, 06:00 PM
Gary, thank you very much for this:
"D N you are a special case and I will address your "Polite rejoinder" comments offline. Other than correctly pointing out the innapropriatess of my raising the subject, I feel you - more so than anyone else - have misinterpreted and miscommunicated so many aspects of the issue, that it would be further innapropriate of me to mention them here."
Thanks for 'outing' my full name, hardly a secret but a courtesy we all try to do for one another here. And a first even for the old group, but now from our former non-moderator and secular saint nonetheless
An accident? Not in light of what I consider misconduct on your part that caused my family a great deal of personal grief when you refused to even allow me to discuss it with you by contacting you as the forum administrator. An accident? I don't think so.
And thank you for singling me out to attack my motives for objecting to what you know admit was a bad idea. Yes, now you say it was just a bad idea, sorry, but then why attack my motives for disagreeing with you -- and saying to everyone else that what I did was so bad, that you can only chastise me privately?
A classic hit and run. Hit me and then take the high road.
Don't bother trying to contact me off-line, Gary. You are not allowed to send me any private notes after that shot. Take it in the same spirit as what you did when you refused to accept my notes asking you to remove my email link because my wife was at home crying and calling our local authorities because she was getting filthly notes from the trolls you thought should have access to our shared email. I reached out to you to simply ask that my email link be removed. You blocked my posts. (And I have all the 'bounces' for anyone who would like to see them, as well as notes from your 'fans' who have shared some of your real comments with me about the whole affair.)
Oh, never mind. Gary. Nothing you did wrong. The BASEMENT was a wonderful idea. Coming on here and asking all of us to shut the forum was just a bad idea, but something you admitted ONLY after some of us didn't agree with it. And yes, I was very vocal in my disagreements, and I was so bad in doing so that I deserve to be singled out by you and have you attack my motives for pointing out your 'mistake.' (Or, perhaps, attacking me for frustrating your ideas, because I thought they were ill-conveived.)
But that was bad on my part, and I recognize it. You are a saint on this group, can do no wrong, and I am Satan. I deserve to be 'outed' -- *&%$# lawyer!
Relax, Gary, no need to lash out against me as you so clearly did above. You almost pulled it off, and all of those nice notes to you saying it was okay for you to try to shut down this forum -- who could ever question why you want to do that -- should make what you tried to do soon fade into the past.
And to help divert attention from what you tried to do, just blame your favorite whipping boy, that *&%$# lawyer!. Nobody seemed to call you on that nor say, "why single out Dave, Gary, others agreed with him. Why bring up his motives and then go so far as to use his full name, which you have access to as the former administrator?'
No, Gary can't be faulted for that, can he? It is all your fault Dave, you put the idea into Gary's head. Leave him alone. Stop frustrating his well intended mistakes. He deserves praise for his mistakes, as we are now all falling over ourselves to give him, and we don't like you picking on him as he has just complained about. He was within his rights to say what he did about you for frustrating his plans. Shame on you.
I agree. We don't want people here who rock the boat by pointing out the obvious. Contact Ben. Tell Gary that you won't join his new forums if I am permitted there. Tell Ben I am causing trouble again and tell him it is either me or you.
The 'report this post' button is at the bottom folks. Do your part, get rid of me and let's all go back to thanking someone for a 'well intended' effort to sink the ship once again.
Dave N. -- and a Happy Holidays to those of you who still want to talk to me.
"D N you are a special case and I will address your "Polite rejoinder" comments offline. Other than correctly pointing out the innapropriatess of my raising the subject, I feel you - more so than anyone else - have misinterpreted and miscommunicated so many aspects of the issue, that it would be further innapropriate of me to mention them here."
Thanks for 'outing' my full name, hardly a secret but a courtesy we all try to do for one another here. And a first even for the old group, but now from our former non-moderator and secular saint nonetheless
An accident? Not in light of what I consider misconduct on your part that caused my family a great deal of personal grief when you refused to even allow me to discuss it with you by contacting you as the forum administrator. An accident? I don't think so.
And thank you for singling me out to attack my motives for objecting to what you know admit was a bad idea. Yes, now you say it was just a bad idea, sorry, but then why attack my motives for disagreeing with you -- and saying to everyone else that what I did was so bad, that you can only chastise me privately?
A classic hit and run. Hit me and then take the high road.
Don't bother trying to contact me off-line, Gary. You are not allowed to send me any private notes after that shot. Take it in the same spirit as what you did when you refused to accept my notes asking you to remove my email link because my wife was at home crying and calling our local authorities because she was getting filthly notes from the trolls you thought should have access to our shared email. I reached out to you to simply ask that my email link be removed. You blocked my posts. (And I have all the 'bounces' for anyone who would like to see them, as well as notes from your 'fans' who have shared some of your real comments with me about the whole affair.)
Oh, never mind. Gary. Nothing you did wrong. The BASEMENT was a wonderful idea. Coming on here and asking all of us to shut the forum was just a bad idea, but something you admitted ONLY after some of us didn't agree with it. And yes, I was very vocal in my disagreements, and I was so bad in doing so that I deserve to be singled out by you and have you attack my motives for pointing out your 'mistake.' (Or, perhaps, attacking me for frustrating your ideas, because I thought they were ill-conveived.)
But that was bad on my part, and I recognize it. You are a saint on this group, can do no wrong, and I am Satan. I deserve to be 'outed' -- *&%$# lawyer!
Relax, Gary, no need to lash out against me as you so clearly did above. You almost pulled it off, and all of those nice notes to you saying it was okay for you to try to shut down this forum -- who could ever question why you want to do that -- should make what you tried to do soon fade into the past.
And to help divert attention from what you tried to do, just blame your favorite whipping boy, that *&%$# lawyer!. Nobody seemed to call you on that nor say, "why single out Dave, Gary, others agreed with him. Why bring up his motives and then go so far as to use his full name, which you have access to as the former administrator?'
No, Gary can't be faulted for that, can he? It is all your fault Dave, you put the idea into Gary's head. Leave him alone. Stop frustrating his well intended mistakes. He deserves praise for his mistakes, as we are now all falling over ourselves to give him, and we don't like you picking on him as he has just complained about. He was within his rights to say what he did about you for frustrating his plans. Shame on you.
I agree. We don't want people here who rock the boat by pointing out the obvious. Contact Ben. Tell Gary that you won't join his new forums if I am permitted there. Tell Ben I am causing trouble again and tell him it is either me or you.
The 'report this post' button is at the bottom folks. Do your part, get rid of me and let's all go back to thanking someone for a 'well intended' effort to sink the ship once again.
Dave N. -- and a Happy Holidays to those of you who still want to talk to me.