PDA

View Full Version : Cross crankset on road bike - front derailleur height adjustment


ontarget
06-28-2016, 06:25 AM
I recently purchased a Specialized Roubaix frame from a member of this forum. I intend to build it up with Ultegra 6800 and would like to run a 11-28 or 11-32 cassette. The fact is, I have no use for a 50-11 high gear. On another bike (with band-type front derailleur) I went with a cross crankset (46/34) and find that the 46T large ring is far more useful for me.

Before I order a cross crankset I'm curious if the slot in the braze-on will allow me to get the front derailleur low enough to run a 46T big ring. Anyone have experience with this?

Thanks.

oldpotatoe
06-28-2016, 06:35 AM
I recently purchased a Specialized Roubaix frame from a member of this forum. I intend to build it up with Ultegra 6800 and would like to run a 11-28 or 11-32 cassette. The fact is, I have no use for a 50-11 high gear. On another bike (with band-type front derailleur) I went with a cross crankset (46/34) and find that the 46T large ring is far more useful for me.

Before I order a cross crankset I'm curious if the slot in the braze-on will allow me to get the front derailleur low enough to run a 46T big ring. Anyone have experience with this?

Thanks.

Really doubt it. Is the brazeon tab bolted onto the frame? If so, maybe Spec. makes a longer tab..like Trek does.

AngryScientist
06-28-2016, 06:42 AM
pro-tip: if you use a triple FD, you can mount the fd a little higher than you normally would and it will shift fine.

gt eunuch
06-28-2016, 07:45 AM
I came across this the other day, and it seems like this could be the perfect application for it (barring it doesnt sit the FD too low). I have never used it, but WickWerks makes solid products, and it isnt too expensive!

https://wickwerks.com/products/fit-link-adapter/

Lewis Moon
06-28-2016, 08:20 AM
From my "back of the envelope" estimation, if you have ~1cm of slot below the bolt with the derailleur properly positioned for the 50, you should be golden.
Of course, I could be totally wrong, and often am.

What type of cassettes are you on? Is there a chance you could find a "junior" cassette that starts at 13? There's nothing magic about an 11.

grawk
06-28-2016, 08:22 AM
or just hand build a cassette with the gears you want

wallymann
06-28-2016, 08:25 AM
I came across this the other day, and it seems like this could be the perfect application for it (barring it doesnt sit the FD too low). I have never used it, but WickWerks makes solid products, and it isnt too expensive!

https://wickwerks.com/products/fit-link-adapter/

neat product! looks like a real problem-solver.

https://wickwerks.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/fit-link-web-product.jpg

ontarget
06-28-2016, 09:11 AM
The WickWerks option is interesting, though from my reading it looks like it may lower the FD too much, as it's designed for an even smaller chainring than 46T.

I looked at junior cassettes, but the only one I found is 14-28. That's not high enough with a 34-50 crankset. (I'm tough to please!)

As for custom cassettes, I'll have to see what options I have, though with cogs riveted together onto carriers I may be limited in this regard.

I may just have to mount a 34-50 crankset that I have, position the FD, and see how much room I have to lower it. My calculations show that I'll have to move the FD about 8mm lower switching from 50T to 46T.

gt eunuch
06-28-2016, 09:32 AM
http://bbbcycling.com/bike-parts/cassettes/BCS-11S

another option, they have some crazy gearing choices, including an 18-28 (frame clearance may suffer on this though? How many frames can hold a 18 in the outboard position?)

11.4
06-28-2016, 12:39 PM
Not trying to derail your approach, but the issue isn't whether you need a 50/11, as much as whether you like riding a 50 x 13,14,15,16,17,18,19,21 etc. Those are the gears that determine whether a 50 is right for you. Similarly, your 34 may be used mostly with your 12, 13, 14, and so on.

I've ridden a couple bikes with the Wickwerks adapter. On both it barely works with a 44 front ring. It does throw in a little bit of flexibility into the shifting system, not enough to really feel it with manual shifting but definitely with Di2.

gt eunuch
06-28-2016, 01:29 PM
Not trying to derail your approach, but the issue isn't whether you need a 50/11, as much as whether you like riding a 50 x 13,14,15,16,17,18,19,21 etc. Those are the gears that determine whether a 50 is right for you. Similarly, your 34 may be used mostly with your 12, 13, 14, and so on.

I've ridden a couple bikes with the Wickwerks adapter. On both it barely works with a 44 front ring. It does throw in a little bit of flexibility into the shifting system, not enough to really feel it with manual shifting but definitely with Di2.

Just curious, what does 'barely works' here mean? meaning it puts the FD barely too low, barely too high?

cachagua
06-28-2016, 02:10 PM
If there's room for it in the derailleur you're going to use, you might drill & tap a second hole higher up. Check that you'll get enough engagement between the tab & derailleur, before committing, though -- hold it up there first and see what it looks like.

Or, grind the tab off the frame and use a clamp-style derailleur.

One caution: I put a 46-tooth ring on a bike recently and found that the derailleur's cage hit the chainstay -- had to use a different one. Make you've got room to move the thing down as far as you want!

Ditch the derailleur and go single-chainring? C'mon, all the cool kids are doing it...

vqdriver
06-28-2016, 02:17 PM
erm, i'd just try it with the existing fd location.

Cicli
06-28-2016, 02:27 PM
erm, i'd just try it with the existing fd location.

Agreed, I bet it will work.

ColonelJLloyd
06-28-2016, 02:28 PM
One of the reasons I'm against braze on FDs.

spartanKid
06-28-2016, 02:30 PM
erm, i'd just try it with the existing fd location.

This is what I would do.

ALSO, if you find that the FD cage is too long/hits the chainstay, look into getting either the Shimano CX70 FD or the BURD FD from Gevenalle, both of which have a slightly smaller cage optimized for large chainrings that are more like 42-50 T instead of the normal road FDs that are designed for larger chainrings like 50+.

bjf
06-28-2016, 03:05 PM
The WickWerks option is interesting, though from my reading it looks like it may lower the FD too much, as it's designed for an even smaller chainring than 46T.

I looked at junior cassettes, but the only one I found is 14-28. That's not high enough with a 34-50 crankset. (I'm tough to please!)

As for custom cassettes, I'll have to see what options I have, though with cogs riveted together onto carriers I may be limited in this regard.

I may just have to mount a 34-50 crankset that I have, position the FD, and see how much room I have to lower it. My calculations show that I'll have to move the FD about 8mm lower switching from 50T to 46T.

For quite a while I used a hybrid 13-28 cassette, made up of the 13 through 19 from a junior 13-25 6600 plus the 21-24-28 from a 6700 11-28. Sometimes a little slow shifting from the 19 to 21, sometimes not, but worth it for the results. Single tooth steps in the flat zone, then up to 28 in the hill zone.

josephr
06-28-2016, 09:29 PM
It'll work...I just built a Giant Avail for a newbie and installed an FD-5700 with a 46/36 crank....The FD is at the very bottom of the slot for the braze-on, but no problems with fitting/shifting at all.