Deda Zero 100 vs. FSA Wing Pro/ Omega Compact

[Themalletor]

Can anyone thats used both comment which one they like better and why?

I know the deda is a little deeper and the FSA has a little more reach.

Looking for a new compact alloy handlebar!

[J. Anquetil]

The Deda Zero 100 has a slightly straight segment on the bend, after the brake grips, which you may or may not like. As you move your hand forward from the lower end of the bars you'll find a slightly abrupt turn going to that straight segment. It's better to check the bars in real life before you commit. That said, I'd bet 95% of the population will be fine with the Zero 100.

[Climb01742]

The FSA bars narrow from drops to hoods. Meaning, a 42 c-to-c FSA bar is 42 on the drops but only 40 at the hoods. Deda bars are equally wide at hoods and drops.

And FSA bars have flat-ish tops vs round tops on the Deda bar.

[beeatnik]

Zero100s look better.

[martinez]

FSA omega's have the perfect shape for me.
Was perfect for when I owned an all city nature boy, so I've been meaning on putting them on my road bike and my fixed gear. The hood transition is awesome too...very comfy around the hoods and while in the drop!

Can't comment on the dedas though..

[Raffy]

And FSA bars have flat-ish tops vs round tops on the Deda bar.

My Zero100s have an egg-shaped top to them.........is there a round version?

[parris]

I don't know if Deda had a round profile bar at the zero 100 level but their RHM 1 bar which is a round profile has the same drop and reach numbers.

[Climb01742]

My Zero100s have an egg-shaped top to them.........is there a round version?

My bad. They feel more round to me than FSA, but your description is more accurate. Thanks for clarifying.

[Keith A]

Here's a couple of discussions on these bars that you might find helpful...
http://forums.thepaceline.net/showthread.php?t=173004
http://forums.thepaceline.net/showthread.php?t=174294