Why a Fat Bike?

[rugbysecondrow]

I know people started riding Fat Bikes in the snow, but it seems they are more mainstream on the trails, sales floor and out and about.

Why a Fat Bike?

For a MTB, are they being used in lieu of a full suspension or front suspension ride?

These seem heavy and lack nimbleness, but is that wrong?

Thanks,

Paul

[Dave B]

my take and the reason I want to give it a go is that it is different, unique, and my pals say it is just a blast.m I think the traction is supposed to be fantastic on trails and to be honest I think different can be fun. Not as much squish as a full suspended bike, but more than a typical hard tail.

Again it is the curiosity that propels me, but I have a few pals who just love it. I trust them w/o question.

that is just me though. only ridden with guys who have them, not had the pleasure myself.

[twors]

I rode a fatbike for the first (and last) time last weekend at a specialized mountain demo, a fatboy. I couldnt get off it fast enough! Sounded like a freight train rolling thru the woods. It had horrible self steer and I couldn;t stand the way it bobbed along while pedaling. Not a fan....I'll spin on my trainer when it snows.

[ofcounsel]

Fat bikes are not in lieu of Full-Sus. I think for certain situations, Fat bikes can offer significant advantages (Snow, sand). But we don't see too many of them on our local rides in SoCal because many of our trails are straight forward long fire road climbs combined with long, technical downhills. These types of trails don't favor the use of a fat bike.

But I have a really fit buddy who rides one as his primary MTB. His big thing was to be "different". I like that he rides the fatbike because he's much more fit than I (he weighs 150lbs and puts in about 9 hours of saddle time per week compared to my 230lbs and 4 hours a week of saddle time). The fat bike is a great equalizer because it's a lot more work to do long climbs with a fat bike (the bike is big handicap for him).

[mtb_frk]

I really like my Farley and want to try a fat boy at some point. Riding it isnt close to my full suspension bike by any means, it is a fully rigid bike after all. But it isnt as rough as my fully rigid 29er either. I would like to get a bluto for it.
What surprised me the most was how much it feels like a regular mountain bike. Riding it on a groomed fat bike trail last winter was a blast, and I have enjoyed it this summer also. I think I am going to race it next weekend just because.

[93legendti]

Worst bikes ever. If you try one , you will have 7 years of bad luck.

[merckx]

Every time I see a picture of a fat bike in the snow, I think of the wasted opportunity to exercise a pair of Nordic skis.

[p nut]

Every time I see a picture of a fat bike in the snow, I think of the wasted opportunity to exercise a pair of Nordic skis.

I'm thankful for you skiers that leave a nice trail for me to follow! :)

I used to be a ski bum, doing 90+ days a year. Prefer biking now, unless it's waist deep pow.

As to "why", there are several reasons given already, but for me, I find that it's just a different way to experience a trail. I take different lines, attacking a climb is much different, and it's definitely much harder workout than on my regular mountain bike. Pretty fun.

[Rogue Cycles]

because people weren't buying as many mountain bikes would be my guess. marketing teams had to find the new seller. since it looks more like a motorcycle...

who knows

[MattTuck]

Obesity problem in this country has transcended people and now actually plagues the machines we ride to try to get healthy?


Just kidding. It's like riding a tractor, or a skidder. It can go over pretty much anything. It requires less technical skills and allows you to get over most terrain. I'll avoid using the term 'dumbing down' the discipline of mountain biking, but the idea of 'choosing your line' on a fat bike is, ummm, more of a suggestion.

[Tin Turtle]

I have advanced from loathing mine to being pointlessly optimistic I might find some use for it this winter. Should have tried before buying but i believed the hype

[merckx]

I'm thankful for you skiers that leave a nice trail for me to follow! :)

I used to be a ski bum, doing 90+ days a year. Prefer biking now, unless it's waist deep pow.

As to "why", there are several reasons given already, but for me, I find that it's just a different way to experience a trail. I take different lines, attacking a climb is much different, and it's definitely much harder workout than on my regular mountain bike. Pretty fun.

Nordic skis are not Alpine skis.

[djg21]

I never saw a need. I've always ridden a regular MTB in the snow with 2.25" studded tires. That was until this past winter, when we had so much snow that the trails near me remained impassible from late December through the spring.

[Cat3roadracer]

Also interesting to me that there are fat bike divisions in cross races this season. I couldn't imagine hoisting 40+ pounds on my shoulder to run up an incline.

[zank]

Myette crushed my soul on his fat bike the other day. And he did it with a big s**t eatin grin.

[teleguy57]

Every time I see a picture of a fat bike in the snow, I think of the wasted opportunity to exercise a pair of Nordic skis.

I think they could be fun, but the trails appeal to me more as a skier than a snow biker.

I have advanced from loathing mine to being pointlessly optimistic I might find some use for it this winter. Should have tried before buying but i believed the hype

I've ridden one once (dry conditions vs on snow, and I wanted to really like it, but didn't really do much for me. I do wan to like it, but am concerned if I get one (a friend has a Necromancer in my size he'd like me to buy so he can get a sexy carbon fatvunderbike) it will mostly sit in the garage while I go ski and do other stuff.

[commonguy001]

I've had fat bikes since the first batch of purple pugsleys frames Surly released.
That bike was a tank and steered like a dump truck. Sold it for a Moonlander and have had that since whenever those were released, it's fine and has lots of float for a bike.
Both Surlys are tanks, good for putting in long hours on snowy trails.

I recently picked up a Borealis Echo and it's a whole different animal than the Surly bikes. Pretty light for a fat bike and has more trail bike geometry, feels more like a MTB when there isn't snow. Works great on sandy trails which I have lots of out my back door. Well under 30 pounds even with a Bluto fork and will be around 25 with the carbon fork for when the snow falls.

I'm not really a mountain biker but like to get outside when the weather is crap so it's a good option for that. If roads are clear and I can get out of town on pavement I'll roll with fenders but that isn't always an option and I'm not doing 5 hour trainer rides in the winter but do plenty of big fat bike rides that are that long.

[p nut]

Nordic skis are not Alpine skis.

Who said anything about alpine skiing? :rolleyes:

[JAGI410]

A fat bike with 120tpi "supple" tires, set up tubeless, is something to be experienced. My Mukluk is just under 29lbs and rips along just fine. Being in MN, it sees most of the action in the winter, but it's been out several times in the summer and always makes me smile. The traction, and most importantly, the confidence instilled by those giant tires (I run 4.7's) allows a lot of forgiveness in line selection. I'd gladly give up my 650B hard tail if I had to, and just keep the fatty.

[ORMojo]

The simplest and most direct answer to the OP's question: Why Not?

I've given that answer to many similar questions here on the forum and elsewhere, and here is why. (With all due respect - absolutely no offense intended.) The "Why?" question in situations like this is the narrow-minded pessimistic question. If you are asking "Why?" then you aren't simply stepping back and being open to the more optimistic "Why Not!"

I recently picked up a Borealis Echo and it's a whole different animal than the Surly bikes. Pretty light for a fat bike and has more trail bike geometry, feels more like a MTB when there isn't snow. Works great on sandy trails which I have lots of out my back door. Well under 30 pounds even with a Bluto fork and will be around 25 with the carbon fork for when the snow falls.

My one-week-old Borealis Yampa also fits this description. 27 pounds stock, planning to get it to ~24 (maybe lower) when rigid with different wheels/tires/no tubes/bars/stem/post. Adding the suspension fork I'll use when desired (Lauf Carbonara) will only take it up a single pound or so over the rigid. Those weights are almost exactly the same as my Moots Mooto-X YBB with a traditional suspension fork. I'm not a weight-weenie, and the Yampa is plenty light and nimble for me.

The geo, or at least what I have already experienced as the resulting handling, is very much to my liking for certain (non-snow, non-beach - I'll get to those later) mountain biking around here. So far I've had it on fairly simple tight single track, much more technical rocky, rooty, very sandy (this time of year, central Oregon trails are extremely dry desert-like sand) trails, and trails over large dry and wet smooth river rocks. It has done extremely well in all of those conditions, and has been a complete blast.

Also interesting to me that there are fat bike divisions in cross races this season. I couldn't imagine hoisting 40+ pounds on my shoulder to run up an incline.

Why would you? See above - no need or reason to have a 40+ pound fat bike. Tracking the weights of the components, I could get mine to 23 pounds if I really wanted to.

It's like riding a tractor, or a skidder. It can go over pretty much anything. It requires less technical skills and allows you to get over most terrain. I'll avoid using the term 'dumbing down' the discipline of mountain biking, but the idea of 'choosing your line' on a fat bike is, ummm, more of a suggestion.

Couldn't really disagree more. When I read "tractor, or a skidder" I conjure negative images of slow and clumsy. Yet, I've already found conditions suited to the fat bike where I'm more nimble and faster than either my Ibis Mojo, Ibis Ripley, or Mooto-X YBB. And I like riding fast! Choosing a line isn't dumbed down, it is just different. And "less technical" - again, no, just different. And it may require more strength/power to keep riding fast and hard over the difficult surfaces (I see that as a positive). Those differences have already allowed me to blast over and through stuff with huge smiles, while covering trails I'm intimately familiar with in the shortest times I've ever achieved, because at this time of year the several inches of sandy soil combined with the razor sharp jumbles of lava rock, or the field of loose round river rocks, would eat up the narrower tires and/or slow me down.

Sure, there are times when the Yampa will provide no advantage whatsoever . . . and so I won't ride it, I'll ride one of the other three mountain bikes, or one of the gravel bikes. But, to that, just yesterday I took the Yampa on a nearby gravel road that I regularly take the Renovo Elwood on (with pretty wide 33 tires), and, again, it was nice to not ever feel on the edge of washing out in the deep gravel.

http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv48/ORMojo1/IMG_20150901_171708_hdr_zpszo5vgltm.jpg (http://s668.photobucket.com/user/ORMojo1/media/IMG_20150901_171708_hdr_zpszo5vgltm.jpg.html)

[Vonruden]

That's a sick ride Ormojo, love it.

I'm riding a Surly Krampus 29+ Black Ops and love it, although not a "fat bike" it is confused by some as a fat bike. It's so much fun to ride and just eats up rocks, roots, and Logsticles. Looking forward to the winter.

http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/jj533/vonruden1/D2B87573-209A-4CCC-B1BD-6016710C1285_zps0gthlg7w.jpg

[CampyorBust]

I love em. As long as I live where it snows, I don't see myself without one. Could my 35 lb steel fat bike replace my 27lb AM 650b full squisher? Not really but if you can only have one mtb and are not looking to set any records it's certainly worth a test ride. Its my snow/rain/trail work bike. It also is no slouch in the speed department, I beat a number of my PRs on it, FWIW it still holds a KOM above some serious folks on some xc speed wagons.

The fat tires certainly add some cushion, its not suspension but you don't get beat up as much as you would on a regular rigid. The roll over and grip is unheard off. This thing will out climb my carbon fs rig on the super steep stuff 20%+ gradients and can come fairly close on regular climbs. It just hauls, literally my axe and 14 lb Stihl saw no problemo, it's the perfect trail work bike.

I like the fact that I do not baby this bike. Though I will not take it beach riding, twice was enough. The amount of clean up and bearing repacking I need to do after a beach ride especially if I touch the water is insane. Just not worth it. Mud, rain and snow all day long, sand and salty water no way Jose!

Saw someone here mentioned it was a cheater bike where you don't need technical ability and the skill to pick and hold the right line, agreed 100% in regular conditions. In snow however, that theory falls by the wayside. Snow conditions vary and when it really starts to pack up, like a few feet, things get interesting. You basically have to balance on a rail of packed snow, with a 2-3ft abyss of white powder on either side, and if your trying to go fast you will eat it a few times for sure. It's perilous. :bike:

[mg2ride]

Why a Fat Bike?

Simply because they look Badass! (Not mine!)


http://www.nextie-bike.com/image/data/gallery/wild-dragon-90mm/1-wild-dragon-90mm-fat-bike-rims-bike-reviews-nextie-bike.jpg

I don't live where it snows, I have no trails anywhere and no intention of riding it on the beach. And still one of these are the only bikes I'm currently interested in.

[Clydesdale]

I've had fat bikes since the first batch of purple pugsleys frames Surly released.
That bike was a tank and steered like a dump truck.

I'm still on one of those purple pugs!

I love winter riding on the fat bike and I take it places on snow that most other options simply won't work. It's a ton of fun, keeps me outside in winter, and keeps me off the mindless fun suck that is called a trainer!

PS - I also cc ski and if snow is good the skis generally get equal opportunity.

[commonguy001]

I'm still on one of those purple pugs!

I love winter riding on the fat bike and I take it places on snow that most other options simply won't work. It's a ton of fun, keeps me outside in winter, and keeps me off the mindless fun suck that is called a trainer!

PS - I also cc ski and if snow is good the skis generally get equal opportunity.

I think the self steering front end was made worse by those original Endomorph tires. Pretty much everything released since then has been a massive improvement.

One of my buddies still has his purple pugs from that same run.

[JAGI410]

I'm still on one of those purple pugs!


I've ridden a bunch of fat bikes, from 50lb Walmart specials to a 22lb Borealis...and the Pugsley still holds its own. Just a well balanced, nice riding bike.

I'm pretty excited for the new Surly Wednesday, combined with the new Race Face dropper post that is supposedly capable of handling -30F temps. Will make getting on and off in the winter so much easier! I'm thinking one of those with 2 forks and 2 wheelsets could cover all of my off pavement needs, year round.

[gomango]

That's a sick ride Ormojo, love it.

I'm riding a Surly Krampus 29+ Black Ops and love it, although not a "fat bike" it is confused by some as a fat bike. It's so much fun to ride and just eats up rocks, roots, and Logsticles. Looking forward to the winter.

http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/jj533/vonruden1/D2B87573-209A-4CCC-B1BD-6016710C1285_zps0gthlg7w.jpg

Agreed.

Ormojo's bike is awesome and it might make me jump this season and buy a fat bike.

Been using our neighbor's Muckluk that just sits there the last two winters down at the river bottoms here in the Twin Cities. It's a great way to get out when the winter weather pushes you to stay inside. I don't ride fat tire bikes that often, but I think I'll up the game this winter.

VR- I just bought an ECR from a forum member on mtbr and it should be here by Wednesday. My new cabin bike for the fire roads.

I'm retiring the Fargo.

http://brimages.bikeboardmedia.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Surly-Bikes-Saddle-Drive-18.jpg

[ORMojo]

I rode a fatbike for the first (and last) time last weekend at a specialized mountain demo, a fatboy. I couldnt get off it fast enough! Sounded like a freight train rolling thru the woods. It had horrible self steer and I couldn;t stand the way it bobbed along while pedaling.

I've had fat bikes since the first batch of purple pugsleys frames Surly released. That bike was a tank and steered like a dump truck.

I think the understanding, design, and geometry have come a long way in just a few years. But it is also about learning how to ride a fat bike - the experience definitely can be improved by adapting your technique.

When I picked my Yampa up, one of the guys at Western Bikeworks spent some time with me giving me tips on technique and handling. Single best piece of advice: steer less, lean more. That, he said, helps avoid any tendency to self steer or the shovel effect from the huge front tire. And he was right. Anyway, having listened to him, and just paying attention to what the bike has been telling me, I've experienced absolutely zero (negative) handling issues, certainly no self steer and no bobbing.

[FierteTi52]

I bought a 907 a few years back before all the frenzy started. Now with all the competition the prices have come down drastically. I use mine mainly for snow riding, it's a blast and feels like a mountain bike. If I was replacing a mountain bike I would consider a 29+

[dustyrider]

I know people started riding Fat Bikes in the snow, but it seems they are more mainstream on the trails, sales floor and out and about.

Why a Fat Bike?

For a MTB, are they being used in lieu of a full suspension or front suspension ride?

These seem heavy and lack nimbleness, but is that wrong?

Thanks,

Paul

Our used market here in Colorado for these bikes is huge! They're right up there with significant other's 54cm or smaller bikes... I would own one if I lived on the beach or at elevation. They're fun just not my kinda fun. I see them as more of a sport utility bicycle. I don't enjoy driving SUVs either.

[ORMojo]

I seriously considered the 29+ specific platform instead of the Yampa. But this way, I can do both. In addition to a lighter fat wheelset for the Yampa, I'd like to get a 29+ wheelset with a couple of tire options. That would really cover the bases.

[rugbysecondrow]

The simplest and most direct answer to the OP's question: Why Not?

I've given that answer to many similar questions here on the forum and elsewhere, and here is why. (With all due respect - absolutely no offense intended.) The "Why?" question in situations like this is the narrow-minded pessimistic question. If you are asking "Why?" then you aren't simply stepping back and being open to the more optimistic "Why Not!"





Why not? How about the $$$$ to buy a fat bike? That is a pretty good reason to ask, right?

[ORMojo]

Why not? How about the $$$$ to buy a fat bike? That is a pretty good reason to ask, right?

Well of course $ enter into any of these decisions. But in the context of your full OP, I took your inquiry to be more about why a fat bike in the context of (or in place of) mountain bikes, not about why buy one versus not buying a bike at all. There are loads of mtbs that are way more expensive than the most expensive fat bike, and lots of inexpensive fat bikes, so I don't see how this specific inquiry applies to fat bikes any more than it does (or doesn't) to all the other expensive acquisitions we debate here.

[rugbysecondrow]

Well of course $ enter into any of these decisions. But in the context of your full OP, I took your inquiry to be more about why a fat bike in the context of (or in place of) mountain bikes, not about why buy one versus not buying a bike at all. There are loads of mtbs that are way more expensive than the most expensive fat bike, and lots of inexpensive fat bikes, so I don't see how this specific inquiry applies to fat bikes any more than it does (or doesn't) to all the other expensive acquisitions we debate here.

Huh?

Not sure I follow the issue with the question. It applied because I didn't understand why people ride fat bikes. Seems reasonable.

Why spend $$$$ on something that was previously viewed as a snow rig, an outlier. Here in North Carolina, local shops carry these in stock, so the question: Why a fat bike? They seem marketed as big MTBs, they have MTB type nobbies.

[gomango]

Huh?

Not sure I follow the issue with the question. It applied because I didn't understand why people ride fat bikes. Seems reasonable.

Why spend $$$$ on something that was previously viewed as a snow rig, an outlier. Here in North Carolina, local shops carry these in stock, so the question: Why a fat bike? They seem marketed as big MTBs, they have MTB type nobbies.

In Minnesota, our winters can be excrutiatingly long.

A fat bike gives us another way to have fun in the winter and break its stranglehold.

I have had a tough time coughing up for one, when our neighbor let's me take his any old time.

If I didn't have that arrangement, I am quite certain I would just go buy one before the first snow of the season.