PDA

View Full Version : $200 per watt


54ny77
09-02-2015, 11:59 AM
$600 to save--wait for it--3 whole watts!

http://cdn.mos.bikeradar.imdserve.com/images/news/2015/08/25/1440533367213-104osy4zco3g1-700-80.jpg


http://www.bikeradar.com/road/news/article/ceramicspeed-oversized-pulley-wheel-system-claimed-to-save-three-watts-45108/

45K10
09-02-2015, 12:41 PM
Whats the deal with the white stuff all over the chain and pulleys?
Is that wax?

54ny77
09-02-2015, 12:47 PM
Apparently the white stuff is:

"Feel the need for even more speed? CeramicSpeed recently bought the rights to Friction Facts' super-slippery UltraFast chain lubrication formula, claiming up to 5 watts of energy savings over a factory chain. That white residue is Teflon, but that's only part of the recipe"

The other part of the recipe, given the price, must be something else. :D

http://media.giphy.com/media/HXI9z0QmpOnmg/giphy.gif

Whats the deal with the white stuff all over the chain and pulleys?
Is that wax?

45K10
09-02-2015, 12:50 PM
Or they took a chain from Paolini's personal stash

Likes2ridefar
09-02-2015, 01:25 PM
i had their pulleys and bottom bracket and they do spin like crazy. the cranks would rock back and forth for a few minutes after spinning them.

i got them for free...

berserk87
09-02-2015, 01:36 PM
This setup offers a greater savings that 3 watts - with no cable routed to the derailleur, as in the photo - I'm guessing it saves dozens of watts.

Maybe it's a wireless cable?

cash05458
09-02-2015, 01:39 PM
I am thinking I just lost more watts over a month even:beer: typing this...

rnhood
09-02-2015, 02:00 PM
[QUOTE=54ny77;1817924]
The other part of the recipe, given the price, must be something else. :D

Yes it is, I think its appropriately called "sucker" cream.

mjb266
09-02-2015, 02:05 PM
imagine the cost if they would use a Dura Ace derailleur...

oldpotatoe
09-02-2015, 02:34 PM
$600 to save--wait for it--3 whole watts!

http://cdn.mos.bikeradar.imdserve.com/images/news/2015/08/25/1440533367213-104osy4zco3g1-700-80.jpg


http://www.bikeradar.com/road/news/article/ceramicspeed-oversized-pulley-wheel-system-claimed-to-save-three-watts-45108/

A fool and his money are soon parted. Some will pay the $, some pros will get them for free. Ceramic is one of the biggest scams ever foisted onto the cycling public. Used to be $1 per gram, now it's $zillions for a watt or two.

berserk87
09-02-2015, 02:43 PM
A fool and his money are soon parted. Some will pay the $, some pros will get them for free. Ceramic is one of the biggest scams ever foisted onto the cycling public. Used to be $1 per gram, now it's $zillions for a watt or two.

Dude. It's not a watt or two. It's three (3) watts. We are talking a third more of wattage savings than what you posted.

Ceramics are magic. Harry Potter's wand was made of ceramics.

oldpotatoe
09-02-2015, 02:47 PM
:):oDude. It's not a watt or two. It's three (3) watts. We are talking a third more of wattage savings than what you posted.

Ceramics are magic. Harry Potter's wand was made of ceramics.

:o

deechee
09-02-2015, 02:51 PM
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41KJFwOWb-L._SY355_.jpg

beeatnik
09-03-2015, 12:49 AM
Ceramicspeed, I like your there's a sucker born every minute (or a weight weenie) style.

dgauthier
09-03-2015, 09:51 AM
(. . .) Yes it is, I think its appropriately called "sucker" cream.

A fool and his money are soon parted. (. . .)

Ceramicspeed, I like your there's a sucker born every minute (or a weight weenie) style.

Now, hold on a second here . . .

First of all, please understand I agree wholeheartedly with your sentiments. But I've been reading this forum for years, and seen people not bat an eye at $400 bib shorts, $600 handlebars, $1000 cranks, $6000 wheels, and on and on and on. Likes2ridefar points out that Ceramicspeed products "spin like crazy", so they do work as claimed. So what makes you single out this particular product for ridicule? Why all the hate?

wallymann
09-03-2015, 12:00 PM
i fitted up an altus on my wife's circa-94 trek MTB...it actually works pretty nicely!

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41KJFwOWb-L._SY355_.jpg

MattTuck
09-03-2015, 12:04 PM
If you plot the number of watts that bike companies save us on the y axis, and time on the x-axis, some time around 2030, bikes will make us fatter because they'll move on their own.

saab2000
09-03-2015, 12:08 PM
Now, hold on a second here . . .

First of all, please understand I agree wholeheartedly with your sentiments. But I've been reading this forum for years, and seen people not bat an eye at $400 bib shorts, $600 handlebars, $1000 cranks, $6000 wheels, and on and on and on. Likes2ridefar points out that Ceramicspeed products "spin like crazy", so they do work as claimed. So what makes you single out this particular product for ridicule? Why all the hate?

Because I think if there were something to actually be gained Shimano or Campagnolo or Sram would be doing it.

BTW, this isn't a new idea. Contador used larger pulleys a few years ago.

54ny77
09-03-2015, 12:55 PM
Among other things!

;)

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_le2VOWJ8fno/TUqhjaUNQaI/AAAAAAAAAU8/8VQN7ZHYP04/s1600/Contador.jpg

Because I think if there were something to actually be gained Shimano or Campagnolo or Sram would be doing it.

BTW, this isn't a new idea. Contador used larger pulleys a few years ago.

rockdude
09-04-2015, 07:10 AM
Obviously there are no competitive TT's here. every second/watt savings count.
In a world where the average price of a superbike is over well 10K, a guy can take his 10 year old cervelo p3 and add a few items like this and end up with a bike that is just as fast as a stock superbike. With all this said, its still about the engine and fit more that the bike.

numbskull
09-04-2015, 07:49 AM
Now, hold on a second here . . .

First of all, please understand I agree wholeheartedly with your sentiments. But I've been reading this forum for years, and seen people not bat an eye at $400 bib shorts, $600 handlebars, $1000 cranks, $6000 wheels, and on and on and on. Likes2ridefar points out that Ceramicspeed products "spin like crazy", so they do work as claimed. So what makes you single out this particular product for ridicule? Why all the hate?

This.

I'm not sure 3 watts is insignificant if you are a racer (although perhaps I am wrong on the physics)

Lets say you average 300 watts over an hour and that output gives you a speed of 30mph. A 3 watt gain is a 1% improvement so your speed increases to 30.3 mph. In one hour you will travel 1/3 of a mile farther than you would with your regular DR. Not insignificant, at least in a time trial setting. Add in a better chain and the gains add up. Furthermore this is not a one time benefit. It is there every time you ride the bike. Indeed, the less powerful you are the bigger the benefit. 3 watts is a 2% gain for a 150 watt average rider.

oldpotatoe
09-04-2015, 08:51 AM
Now, hold on a second here . . .

First of all, please understand I agree wholeheartedly with your sentiments. But I've been reading this forum for years, and seen people not bat an eye at $400 bib shorts, $600 handlebars, $1000 cranks, $6000 wheels, and on and on and on. Likes2ridefar points out that Ceramicspeed products "spin like crazy", so they do work as claimed. So what makes you single out this particular product for ridicule? Why all the hate?

My issue isn't with big pulleys but ceramic in bikes. Marketing 101.

Ceramic for high pressure, high speed, no electrical conductivity, nothing on a bike.

And I'm an equal opportunity offender, all makers of ceramic 'stuff', marketing, including Cult on Campagnolo. A way to differentiate SR from Record.

fa63
09-04-2015, 09:08 AM
This.

I'm not sure 3 watts is insignificant if you are a racer (although perhaps I am wrong on the physics)

Lets say you average 300 watts over an hour and that output gives you a speed of 30mph. A 3 watt gain is a 1% improvement so your speed increases to 30.3 mph. In one hour you will travel 1/3 of a mile farther than you would with your regular DR. Not insignificant, at least in a time trial setting. Add in a better chain and the gains add up. Furthermore this is not a one time benefit. It is there every time you ride the bike. Indeed, the less powerful you are the bigger the benefit. 3 watts is a 2% gain for a 150 watt average rider.

Except a 1% improvement in Watts does not translate to a 1% improvement in speed. The change in speed from 3 Watts is negligible at best.

JMacII
09-04-2015, 10:08 AM
Spending money on pulleys is silly. That money should be spent on custom paint.

It's a hobby. People like to tinker. Whatever. I don't judge.

berserk87
09-04-2015, 11:53 AM
Except a 1% improvement in Watts does not translate to a 1% improvement in speed. The change in speed from 3 Watts is negligible at best.

YES!

I thought that I was the only one seeing it this way. Thanks for making this point.

CunegoFan
09-04-2015, 12:00 PM
Except a 1% improvement in Watts does not translate to a 1% improvement in speed. The change in speed from 3 Watts is negligible at best.

Don't take the marketing claim at face value. Start with 3W, divide by at least two or three to get the real world results, and then calculate the speed improvement.

fa63
09-04-2015, 12:48 PM
1/2 of negligible would still be negligible :D

numbskull
09-04-2015, 12:49 PM
So what is the curve that relates watts to speed?

Obviously it is not linear because of increasing air resistance, but nor is it flat or else getting stronger would be a waste of time.

Also, what sort of watt improvement is necessary to be noticeable?

10 watts, 20 watts?

I don't have a power meter on a bike but when I work on a rowing machine a sustained 10 watt increase in output once I am near peak requires huge effort.

It also strikes me that when thought of as a continuous ongoing improvement the net benefit of a small increase in efficiency will compound over time spent during a ride.

$600 for huge ugly rollers seems stupid to me as well but I suspect the guys building them recognize there is a need and market for small incremental efficiency gains in time trial settings.

cp43
09-04-2015, 12:54 PM
I found this with a quick google search:

http://www.americanroadcycling.org/articles/PSL/WiddersHump/WattsSpeed.htm

I haven't read it, but the I looked at the pictures ;)

It will give you a reasonable idea of what that curve looks like.

Chris


So what is the curve that relates watts to speed?

Obviously it is not linear because of increasing air resistance, but nor is it flat or else getting stronger would be a waste of time.

Also, what sort of watt improvement is necessary to be noticeable?

10 watts, 20 watts?

I don't have a power meter on a bike but when I work on a rowing machine a sustained 10 watt increase in output once I am near peak requires huge effort.

It also strikes me that when thought of as a continuous ongoing improvement the net benefit of a small increase in efficiency will compound over time spent during a ride.

$600 for huge ugly rollers seems stupid to me as well but I suspect the guys building them recognize there is a need and market for small incremental efficiency gains in time trial settings.

numbskull
09-04-2015, 01:03 PM
This site provides a calculator http://americanroadcycling.org/TheBook/PowerToWeightCalculator.aspx?frm=No1-BulletListTxt

For a 140 lb man producing 300 watts adding another 3 watts increases calculated speed from 26.09 to 26.22 MPH.

I think that translates into about a 70 yard advantage over 1 hour.
Is that insignificant?
I would guess it depends on who is answering the question.

Interestingly, the weaker you are the bigger the benefit. A 160lb man producing 180 watts increases his speed by .16mph by going to 183 watts.

Hmmmmmm...........I wonder what the 7 watt chain costs.

ceolwulf
09-04-2015, 01:13 PM
The other thing is the 3 watts has to be at a certain wattage, it's a percentage not an absolute number. So Wiggo might save six watts and I might save 1.5.

numbskull
09-04-2015, 01:26 PM
The link above is fun.

For me (148# @200watt output) adding 10 watts by buying a new DR with big wheels and their pricey slick chain would increase my speed by 1/2 MPH or @ 2.5%.

Obviously then I could work out less, eat more donuts, and stay just as "fast".

I think these guys are onto something.

beeatnik
09-04-2015, 01:34 PM
numbskull, I like your common sense style.

yesterday, on my way to the World Famous Rose Bowl Ride, I had a moment of inadequacy. you see, I wasn't rocking deep carbon like all the other WFRBR cats. i thought, they have it so much easier than me! then it occurred to me (thanks Specialized!) that my super tight Raphaz Aero Pro jersey and my aero Giro helmet along with my super low super PRO position were going to be equalizers as the guys on deep carbon all have giant gutz which negate the 5 wattz wheel advantage. then we all rode in circles and got tired.

So aero. Faster than a 90s Honda

https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5814/20960507310_d5e96a334b_o.jpg

Then, I got hungry
https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5647/20531688204_9f4aa02b89_b.jpg