hudz - original vs soft?

[vqdriver]

for comparisons sake, which is more comparable to stock hood firmness??
this would be for campy btw.

[Lewis Moon]

Original. The soft hoods are comfy, but they are also floppy and spooge around on the levers. I could never keep them in place.
YMMV

[donevwil]

Yes, original. Bought some for my wife's 3rd gen Campy levers and although basically fine and perfectly functional they do not fit as cleanly as Campy hoods.

[PQJ]

In my opinion, neither. They're both crap. Hard version is less crappy, but still crap.

Oh, and YMMV.

[Joe Bob]

Hudz, blow......

[Lewis Moon]

Hudz, blow......

I really don't mind the originals (V3). Wish Campys came in colors.

[vqdriver]

Are most of the problems fit related?

[choke]

Wish Campys came in colors.Campy makes the V3 in black, red and white.

[djg21]

Original. The soft hoods are comfy, but they are also floppy and spooge around on the levers. I could never keep them in place.
YMMV

I could not keep the original ones from slipping on my DA 7900 levers. They lasted a week before I replaced them with OEM hoods. If you use DA 7900 and want a see if Hudz will work for you let me know. They are black.

[cdn_bacon]

the soft ones are too soft and flimsy. Mine snapped at the bottom twice.

Stiff wins

[Shortsocks]

Original. The soft hoods are comfy, but they are also floppy and spooge around on the levers. I could never keep them in place.
YMMV

I'm going through this now. Super soft, but will NOT stay in place at all. It's for sram, not campy, so I can't say as to the campy problem. But I've had to stop multiple times during a ride to fix them. It's so irritating. They suck, prob one of the worst designed products I've ever used.