PDA

View Full Version : UCI backs off idea of amnesty or truth and reconciliation commission for past doping


Tony T
09-21-2012, 09:22 AM
UCI backs off idea of amnesty or truth and reconciliation commission for past doping
FRIDAY, 21 SEPTEMBER 2012 06:22 MIKE CORDER, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

MAASTRICHT, Netherlands - The International Cycling Union backed away Friday from the idea of an amnesty or truth and reconciliation commission for riders who took performance-enhancing drugs in the past.

At its annual congress, the UCI adopted a motion calling on the governing body to deal with current doping cases and "ignore attempts to exploit commercially or otherwise the painful aspects of cycling's past."

The motion was drawn up earlier this week by the UCI's management committee during discussions about the possibility of setting up a truth and reconciliation commission at which riders could confess their doping pasts as a way of cleaning up the sport and draw a line under an era tainted by drugs.

"That was discussed at management committee and ... from that discussion came this (motion)," UCI President Pat McQuaid told The Associated Press after Friday's congress.

The committee said, "This is the direction we need to go. We need to concentrate on the sport today and not so much to the past," McQuaid told AP.

The motion's preamble says there is "no point in continuing to re-examine the past of then undetectable doping and stigmatize the sport of the young generations now that the situation has considerably improved through the UCI's continued efforts."

Asked if the motion meant an end to the idea of setting up a truth and reconciliation commission, McQuaid said: "Not necessarily, we'll have to wait and see."

Earlier Friday, McQuaid emphatically denied that the sport's governing body ever covered up a positive doping test by Lance Armstrong or that the organization ever tipped off the seven-time Tour de France winner ahead of a doping test.

McQuaid told delegates at the congress that the organization "has never hidden a positive sample, not just of Lance Armstrong, but of any other athlete."

Disgraced former rider Floyd Landis has claimed that Armstrong tested positive for the blood booster EPO at the Tour of Switzerland in 2001 and paid off then-UCI president Hein Verbruggen to keep it quiet. Verbruggen and Armstrong have denied the allegations.

Tyler Hamilton, a former Armstrong teammate, also has claimed Armstrong had told him that he had tested positive at the 2001 Tour of Switzerland, but that it wouldn't be a problem because "people took care of it."

McQuaid also rejected claims that the organization tipped off Armstrong ahead of time that he was about to be tested.

He said both explosive claims could be included in a file of evidence compiled by the United States Anti-Doping Agency that prompted it to ban Armstrong from Olympic sport for life and strip him of his seven tour titles.

The UCI has not yet received a copy of the file. McQuaid said that when he gets the report and if UCI lawyers find it "strong and clean," the organization "will give the appropriate sanctions."

Armstrong has long denied doping but chose last month not to fight drug charges by USADA, which wiped out 14 years of his results. USADA believes Armstrong used banned substances as far back as 1996, including EPO, steroids and blood transfusions.

jimcav
09-21-2012, 12:25 PM
I didn't understand how the UCI could do that with the existing WADA code for doping?
But, I don't see how the UCI can be seen as effective or able to clean house anyway.

Either cycling should exit Olympics and exit anti-doping, or something else should emerge besides the UCI to actually serve an anti-doping function--something without a conflict of interest

Black Dog
09-21-2012, 01:28 PM
Not at all surprising. The UCI is a Dinosaur that has yet to realize that it is extinct. I will be expecting the UCI to file a law suit against any minute now...

Grant McLean
09-21-2012, 01:34 PM
Here's the UCI looking for directions to their next meeting...

-g

http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2010/225/2/a/Clown_Car_by_onCue5.jpg

cmg
09-21-2012, 02:08 PM
"I didn't understand how the UCI could do that with the existing WADA code for doping?" The UCI needs to see real physical evidence which there isn't any if we're talking about Lance A. Just a report that they haven't recieved a copy of either. even then it will be 3rd party information. While they have an agreement to uphold the USADA findings without hard copy they'll take their sweet time. expect this this one to fall off the radar until next years tour.

jimcav
09-21-2012, 04:05 PM
not about Lance, but about the idea of amnesty. Under WADA, if you admit to doping, aren't there consequences? i.e. Marion Jones and many others are not based upon a test result. Pro-Cycling is a WADA signatory as far as I understand, so I didn't understand how UCI could propose amnesty?